The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Antifoam, dilution and trace element addition as foaming control strategies in mesophilic anaerobic digestion of sugar beet pulp

Antifoam, dilution and trace element addition as foaming control strategies in mesophilic anaerobic digestion of sugar beet pulp
Antifoam, dilution and trace element addition as foaming control strategies in mesophilic anaerobic digestion of sugar beet pulp
The effectiveness of foaming control strategies, including trace element addition, feedstock dilution and use of antifoams, was assessed for the anaerobic digestion of sugar beet pulp (SBP) at laboratory scale under mesophilic conditions. Semi-continuous digestion at an organic loading rate (OLR) of 2 g VS L-1 day-1 resulted in methane yields of 0.316 L CH4 g-1 of volatile solids (VS), with a VS destruction rate of ~91%. At OLR of 3 g VS L-1 day-1 or above, foaming occurred, accompanied by small increases in alkalinity ratio and volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations and a slight fall in specific biogas and methane production, indicating a minor reduction in process stability and performance. At OLR 5 g VS L-1 day-1 foaming was persistent and severe. In contrast, digesters fed at OLR 5 g VS L-1 day-1 and supplemented with selected trace elements showed stable performance with no foaming. Dilution has proved an effective control strategy for other feedstocks, but feeding with diluted SBP (1:1 w/w) led to a decline in gas production and operational stability, with no significant benefits in eliminating foaming. Seven antifoams were tested for foam reduction and effects on batch digestion at a range of concentrations. Addition of certain antifoams at dosages of 0.5 mL L-1 or more could inhibit gas production. A selected antifoam agent was then trialled in semi-continuous digestion at OLR 5 g VS L-1 day-1. Repeated high antifoam dosing of 1 mL L-1 digestate was required to reduce foaming, and eventually proved inhibitory. More reliable screening tests are needed for antifoam selection, as batch toxicity testing may not provide a satisfactory guide to performance in continuous operation.
Sugar beet pulp, foaming, organic loading rate, Trace elements, antifoam, anaerobic digestion
0964-8305
1-13
Suhartini, Sri
6b1f437a-a266-48eb-a7ec-9bbc1db0f817
Heaven, Sonia
f25f74b6-97bd-4a18-b33b-a63084718571
Zhang, Yue
69b11d32-d555-46e4-a333-88eee4628ae7
Banks, Charles
5c6c8c4b-5b25-4e37-9058-50fa8d2e926f
Suhartini, Sri
6b1f437a-a266-48eb-a7ec-9bbc1db0f817
Heaven, Sonia
f25f74b6-97bd-4a18-b33b-a63084718571
Zhang, Yue
69b11d32-d555-46e4-a333-88eee4628ae7
Banks, Charles
5c6c8c4b-5b25-4e37-9058-50fa8d2e926f

Suhartini, Sri, Heaven, Sonia, Zhang, Yue and Banks, Charles (2019) Antifoam, dilution and trace element addition as foaming control strategies in mesophilic anaerobic digestion of sugar beet pulp. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 145, 1-13, [104812]. (doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2019.104812).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The effectiveness of foaming control strategies, including trace element addition, feedstock dilution and use of antifoams, was assessed for the anaerobic digestion of sugar beet pulp (SBP) at laboratory scale under mesophilic conditions. Semi-continuous digestion at an organic loading rate (OLR) of 2 g VS L-1 day-1 resulted in methane yields of 0.316 L CH4 g-1 of volatile solids (VS), with a VS destruction rate of ~91%. At OLR of 3 g VS L-1 day-1 or above, foaming occurred, accompanied by small increases in alkalinity ratio and volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations and a slight fall in specific biogas and methane production, indicating a minor reduction in process stability and performance. At OLR 5 g VS L-1 day-1 foaming was persistent and severe. In contrast, digesters fed at OLR 5 g VS L-1 day-1 and supplemented with selected trace elements showed stable performance with no foaming. Dilution has proved an effective control strategy for other feedstocks, but feeding with diluted SBP (1:1 w/w) led to a decline in gas production and operational stability, with no significant benefits in eliminating foaming. Seven antifoams were tested for foam reduction and effects on batch digestion at a range of concentrations. Addition of certain antifoams at dosages of 0.5 mL L-1 or more could inhibit gas production. A selected antifoam agent was then trialled in semi-continuous digestion at OLR 5 g VS L-1 day-1. Repeated high antifoam dosing of 1 mL L-1 digestate was required to reduce foaming, and eventually proved inhibitory. More reliable screening tests are needed for antifoam selection, as batch toxicity testing may not provide a satisfactory guide to performance in continuous operation.

Text
Suhartini et al antifoam 2019 - scholar text - Accepted Manuscript
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 30 September 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 October 2019
Published date: November 2019
Keywords: Sugar beet pulp, foaming, organic loading rate, Trace elements, antifoam, anaerobic digestion

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 434961
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/434961
ISSN: 0964-8305
PURE UUID: 09130322-d05c-44dc-b796-202dc62a2fbd
ORCID for Sonia Heaven: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7798-4683
ORCID for Yue Zhang: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5068-2260
ORCID for Charles Banks: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6795-814X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Oct 2019 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:56

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sri Suhartini
Author: Sonia Heaven ORCID iD
Author: Yue Zhang ORCID iD
Author: Charles Banks ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×