The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Correlating the role of hydrophilic/hydrophobic nature of Rh(I) and Ru(II) supported organosilica/silica catalysts in organotransformation reactions

Correlating the role of hydrophilic/hydrophobic nature of Rh(I) and Ru(II) supported organosilica/silica catalysts in organotransformation reactions
Correlating the role of hydrophilic/hydrophobic nature of Rh(I) and Ru(II) supported organosilica/silica catalysts in organotransformation reactions
Highly reactive and hydrophobic triphenyl phosphine based rhodium(I) and ruthenium(II) organometallic complexes over benzene containing periodic mesoporous organosilica (PMOB) have been synthesized. This has been achieved by the immobilization of neat metal complexes like RhCl(PPh3)3 [Wilkinson catalyst], RuHCl(CO)(PPh3)3 and RuCl2(PPh3)3 over aminofunctionalized PMOB to get RhCl(PPh3)2-PrNH2PMOB, RuHCl(CO)(PPh3)2-PrNH2PMOB and RuCl2(PPh3)3-PrNH2PMOB, respectively. The physico-chemical properties of the functionalized catalysts were analyzed by elemental analysis, ICP-OES, XRD, N2 sorption analyses, FT-IR, solid state 13C and 29Si NMR spectra, XPS, SEM, TEM and contact angle measurements. The XRD and N2 sorption analyses showed excellent textural properties with ordered mesoporous channel structure of all synthesized catalysts. The organic moieties anchored in PMOB were confirmed by 13C CPMAS NMR and FT-IR spectroscopy with 29Si CPMAS NMR spectroscopy providing the information about the degree of functionalization of surface silanol groups with organic moiety. The Rh(I) and Ru(II) complexes supported on MCM-41/SBA-15/PMOE (ethane–PMO) were synthesized, and their catalytic activities in hydrogenation and sulfoxidation reactions were compared with Rh(I) and Ru(II) complexes supported on PMOB. The results show that PMOB based catalysts exhibit higher activities and selectivities than MCM-41/SBA-15/PMOE supported catalysts, neat homogeneous complexes and without catalyst. The better catalytic performance of PMOB based catalyst is attributed to the hydrophobic nature and high surface area of the PMOB support. The recycling studies of anchored catalysts show no major deactivation of the catalyst.
0926-860X
138-146
Lazar, Anish
f01c546a-a2e1-4b7b-a121-dd6e06de6b61
George, Shoy C.
d43d8c2d-36e4-45e0-a101-703710fa07c1
Jitesh, P.R.
f03b5fe7-9180-4a2e-9994-bbe0dcbdad73
Vinod, Chathakudath P.
02386bb6-9b4a-4904-99e2-8c7702ebf582
Singh, A.P.
df443df3-4520-4abc-9aff-09160821b030
Lazar, Anish
f01c546a-a2e1-4b7b-a121-dd6e06de6b61
George, Shoy C.
d43d8c2d-36e4-45e0-a101-703710fa07c1
Jitesh, P.R.
f03b5fe7-9180-4a2e-9994-bbe0dcbdad73
Vinod, Chathakudath P.
02386bb6-9b4a-4904-99e2-8c7702ebf582
Singh, A.P.
df443df3-4520-4abc-9aff-09160821b030

Lazar, Anish, George, Shoy C., Jitesh, P.R., Vinod, Chathakudath P. and Singh, A.P. (2016) Correlating the role of hydrophilic/hydrophobic nature of Rh(I) and Ru(II) supported organosilica/silica catalysts in organotransformation reactions. Applied Catalysis A: General, 513, 138-146. (doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2015.12.026).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Highly reactive and hydrophobic triphenyl phosphine based rhodium(I) and ruthenium(II) organometallic complexes over benzene containing periodic mesoporous organosilica (PMOB) have been synthesized. This has been achieved by the immobilization of neat metal complexes like RhCl(PPh3)3 [Wilkinson catalyst], RuHCl(CO)(PPh3)3 and RuCl2(PPh3)3 over aminofunctionalized PMOB to get RhCl(PPh3)2-PrNH2PMOB, RuHCl(CO)(PPh3)2-PrNH2PMOB and RuCl2(PPh3)3-PrNH2PMOB, respectively. The physico-chemical properties of the functionalized catalysts were analyzed by elemental analysis, ICP-OES, XRD, N2 sorption analyses, FT-IR, solid state 13C and 29Si NMR spectra, XPS, SEM, TEM and contact angle measurements. The XRD and N2 sorption analyses showed excellent textural properties with ordered mesoporous channel structure of all synthesized catalysts. The organic moieties anchored in PMOB were confirmed by 13C CPMAS NMR and FT-IR spectroscopy with 29Si CPMAS NMR spectroscopy providing the information about the degree of functionalization of surface silanol groups with organic moiety. The Rh(I) and Ru(II) complexes supported on MCM-41/SBA-15/PMOE (ethane–PMO) were synthesized, and their catalytic activities in hydrogenation and sulfoxidation reactions were compared with Rh(I) and Ru(II) complexes supported on PMOB. The results show that PMOB based catalysts exhibit higher activities and selectivities than MCM-41/SBA-15/PMOE supported catalysts, neat homogeneous complexes and without catalyst. The better catalytic performance of PMOB based catalyst is attributed to the hydrophobic nature and high surface area of the PMOB support. The recycling studies of anchored catalysts show no major deactivation of the catalyst.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 21 December 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 December 2015
Published date: 5 March 2016

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 435015
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/435015
ISSN: 0926-860X
PURE UUID: d8fe2f44-7beb-4ed4-85cc-d5244faf2f3d

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Oct 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Anish Lazar
Author: Shoy C. George
Author: P.R. Jitesh
Author: Chathakudath P. Vinod
Author: A.P. Singh

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×