The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Top research priorities in healthcare-associated infection in the UK

Top research priorities in healthcare-associated infection in the UK
Top research priorities in healthcare-associated infection in the UK

Background: There is a mismatch between research questions which are considered to be important by patients, carers and healthcare professionals and the research performed in many fields of medicine. No relevant studies which have assessed research priorities in healthcare-associated infection (HCAI) that have involved patients' and carers' opinions were identified in the literature. Aim: The Healthcare-Associated Infections Priority Setting Partnership was established to identify the top research priorities in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of HCAI in the UK, considering the opinions of all these groups. Methods: The methods broadly followed the principles of the James Lind Alliance (JLA) priority setting activity. Findings: In total, 259 unique valid research questions were identified from 221 valid responses to a consultation of patients, carers and healthcare professionals after seeking their opinions for research priorities. The steering committee of the priority setting partnership rationalized these to 50 unique questions. A literature review established that for these questions there were no recent high-quality systematic reviews, high-quality systematic reviews which concluded that further studies were necessary, or the steering committee considered that further research was required despite the conclusions of recent systematic reviews. An interim survey ranked the 50 questions, and the 10 main research priorities were identified from the top 32 questions by consensus at a final priority setting workshop of patients, carers and healthcare professionals using group discussions. Conclusions: A priority setting process using JLA methods and principles involving patients, carers and healthcare professionals was used to identify the top 10 priority areas for research related to HCAI. Basic, translational, clinical and public health research would be required to address these uncertainties.

Antibiotic resistance, Antimicrobial resistance, Healthcare-associated infections, Point-of-care testing, Research priorities
0195-6701
Wilson, P.
0c9e5b9a-f56e-4c0c-98d0-01d65560f4f2
Gurusamy, K. S.
3ff9bd78-a613-4511-ac1c-b745baf3286c
Morley, R.
aaaeb93c-53b3-41d1-a5ca-4c3d6d383f94
Whiting, C.
4a8a3a06-0a6b-4e8a-b8c5-420bec564add
Maeso, B.
da13da7b-2f26-4f90-87b2-d686974d46d2
FitzGerald, G.
8d7cff98-0070-4002-bd8d-6a5b73ccc25e
Bennett, S.
7a9fa50a-39d1-4e82-a1f3-d3cdb5f5e6f8
Bostock, J.
b061a0f3-0d6b-4e04-837d-d670a7bfe286
Brealey, D.
0e78d5ba-b3e4-458d-b72e-a044df0d1d69
Cann, M.
3f8c55cc-7740-4bc6-b6f3-f35af57c166c
Kiernan, M.
e9775b64-6b36-475a-8949-87a6e3282190
Leaper, D.
6ae14ae2-26a3-4487-84ac-9197a1782364
Moore, M.
1be81dad-7120-45f0-bbed-f3b0cc0cfe99
Oppenheim, B.
1331fbc0-5112-4acc-bff8-607a67368d7e
Thompson, P.
1d328b8b-7c39-46d3-9fab-44933e256ef3
Tingle, A.
02866aea-dba1-4240-af6f-48055cee8f7c
Wilson, P.
0c9e5b9a-f56e-4c0c-98d0-01d65560f4f2
Gurusamy, K. S.
3ff9bd78-a613-4511-ac1c-b745baf3286c
Morley, R.
aaaeb93c-53b3-41d1-a5ca-4c3d6d383f94
Whiting, C.
4a8a3a06-0a6b-4e8a-b8c5-420bec564add
Maeso, B.
da13da7b-2f26-4f90-87b2-d686974d46d2
FitzGerald, G.
8d7cff98-0070-4002-bd8d-6a5b73ccc25e
Bennett, S.
7a9fa50a-39d1-4e82-a1f3-d3cdb5f5e6f8
Bostock, J.
b061a0f3-0d6b-4e04-837d-d670a7bfe286
Brealey, D.
0e78d5ba-b3e4-458d-b72e-a044df0d1d69
Cann, M.
3f8c55cc-7740-4bc6-b6f3-f35af57c166c
Kiernan, M.
e9775b64-6b36-475a-8949-87a6e3282190
Leaper, D.
6ae14ae2-26a3-4487-84ac-9197a1782364
Moore, M.
1be81dad-7120-45f0-bbed-f3b0cc0cfe99
Oppenheim, B.
1331fbc0-5112-4acc-bff8-607a67368d7e
Thompson, P.
1d328b8b-7c39-46d3-9fab-44933e256ef3
Tingle, A.
02866aea-dba1-4240-af6f-48055cee8f7c

Wilson, P., Gurusamy, K. S., Morley, R., Whiting, C., Maeso, B., FitzGerald, G., Bennett, S., Bostock, J., Brealey, D., Cann, M., Kiernan, M., Leaper, D., Moore, M., Oppenheim, B., Thompson, P. and Tingle, A. (2019) Top research priorities in healthcare-associated infection in the UK. Journal of Hospital Infection. (doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2019.08.013).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: There is a mismatch between research questions which are considered to be important by patients, carers and healthcare professionals and the research performed in many fields of medicine. No relevant studies which have assessed research priorities in healthcare-associated infection (HCAI) that have involved patients' and carers' opinions were identified in the literature. Aim: The Healthcare-Associated Infections Priority Setting Partnership was established to identify the top research priorities in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of HCAI in the UK, considering the opinions of all these groups. Methods: The methods broadly followed the principles of the James Lind Alliance (JLA) priority setting activity. Findings: In total, 259 unique valid research questions were identified from 221 valid responses to a consultation of patients, carers and healthcare professionals after seeking their opinions for research priorities. The steering committee of the priority setting partnership rationalized these to 50 unique questions. A literature review established that for these questions there were no recent high-quality systematic reviews, high-quality systematic reviews which concluded that further studies were necessary, or the steering committee considered that further research was required despite the conclusions of recent systematic reviews. An interim survey ranked the 50 questions, and the 10 main research priorities were identified from the top 32 questions by consensus at a final priority setting workshop of patients, carers and healthcare professionals using group discussions. Conclusions: A priority setting process using JLA methods and principles involving patients, carers and healthcare professionals was used to identify the top 10 priority areas for research related to HCAI. Basic, translational, clinical and public health research would be required to address these uncertainties.

Text
JLA170719v3i - Accepted Manuscript
Download (76kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 13 August 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 17 August 2019
Keywords: Antibiotic resistance, Antimicrobial resistance, Healthcare-associated infections, Point-of-care testing, Research priorities

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 435292
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/435292
ISSN: 0195-6701
PURE UUID: 6868f634-2b5f-4bc3-94e8-f0bc4b30c4dd
ORCID for M. Moore: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5127-4509

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Oct 2019 17:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:00

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: P. Wilson
Author: K. S. Gurusamy
Author: R. Morley
Author: C. Whiting
Author: B. Maeso
Author: G. FitzGerald
Author: S. Bennett
Author: J. Bostock
Author: D. Brealey
Author: M. Cann
Author: M. Kiernan
Author: D. Leaper
Author: M. Moore ORCID iD
Author: B. Oppenheim
Author: P. Thompson
Author: A. Tingle

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×