Non‐specific amplification compromises environmental DNA metabarcoding with COI
Non‐specific amplification compromises environmental DNA metabarcoding with COI
Metabarcoding extra‐organismal DNA from environmental samples is now a key technique in aquatic biomonitoring and ecosystem health assessment. Of critical consideration when designing experiments, and especially so when developing community standards and legislative frameworks, is the choice of genetic marker and primer set. Mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI), the standard DNA barcode marker for animals, with its extensive reference library, taxonomic discriminatory power and predictable sequence variation, is the natural choice for many metabarcoding applications. However, for targeting specific taxonomic groups in environmental samples, the utility of COI has yet to be fully scrutinized.
Here, by using a case study of marine and freshwater fishes from the British Isles, we quantify the in silico performance of twelve primer pairs from four mitochondrial loci – COI, cytochrome b, 12S and 16S – in terms of reference library coverage, taxonomic discriminatory power and primer universality. We subsequently test in vitro four primer pairs – three COI and one 12S – for their specificity, reproducibility, and congruence with independent datasets derived from traditional survey methods at five estuarine and coastal sites around the English Channel and North Sea.
Our results show that for aqueous extra‐organismal DNA at low template concentrations, both metazoan‐targeted and fish‐targeted COI primers perform poorly in comparison to 12S, exhibiting low levels of reproducibility due to non‐specific amplification of prokaryotic and non‐target eukaryotic DNAs.
An ideal metabarcode would have an extensive reference library upon which custom primers could be designed, either for broad assessments of biodiversity, or taxon specific surveys. Such a database is available for COI, but low primer specificity hinders practical application, while conversely, 12S primers offer high specificity, but lack adequate references. The latter, however, can be mitigated by expanding the concept of DNA barcodes to include whole mitochondrial genomes generated by genome‐skimming existing tissue collections.
Collins, Rupert A.
57855a75-6d3c-452a-8c82-50a254bda26c
Bakker, Judith
3ee5fe36-c2b9-4077-8d01-2a75a3eea441
Wangensteen, Owen S.
dcb32f14-5187-48dc-9e30-af79643b30f1
Soto, Ana Z.
7ed1a5de-dd88-4da5-8e0c-d4094841a41e
Corrigan, Laura
dc7eb941-8a4e-41e2-8243-dee3dceee0da
Sims, David W.
7234b444-25e2-4bd5-8348-a1c142d0cf81
Genner, Martin J.
90547c65-c194-4c93-8ea4-b8523acef1a6
Mariani, Stefano
99f7ad81-4ffa-4c58-ba16-62cc1cd101a6
Yu, Douglas
c21b59a5-ff82-4440-84dd-d8422ab4bc13
Collins, Rupert A.
57855a75-6d3c-452a-8c82-50a254bda26c
Bakker, Judith
3ee5fe36-c2b9-4077-8d01-2a75a3eea441
Wangensteen, Owen S.
dcb32f14-5187-48dc-9e30-af79643b30f1
Soto, Ana Z.
7ed1a5de-dd88-4da5-8e0c-d4094841a41e
Corrigan, Laura
dc7eb941-8a4e-41e2-8243-dee3dceee0da
Sims, David W.
7234b444-25e2-4bd5-8348-a1c142d0cf81
Genner, Martin J.
90547c65-c194-4c93-8ea4-b8523acef1a6
Mariani, Stefano
99f7ad81-4ffa-4c58-ba16-62cc1cd101a6
Yu, Douglas
c21b59a5-ff82-4440-84dd-d8422ab4bc13
Collins, Rupert A., Bakker, Judith, Wangensteen, Owen S., Soto, Ana Z., Corrigan, Laura, Sims, David W., Genner, Martin J., Mariani, Stefano and Yu, Douglas
(2019)
Non‐specific amplification compromises environmental DNA metabarcoding with COI.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution.
(doi:10.1111/2041-210X.13276).
Abstract
Metabarcoding extra‐organismal DNA from environmental samples is now a key technique in aquatic biomonitoring and ecosystem health assessment. Of critical consideration when designing experiments, and especially so when developing community standards and legislative frameworks, is the choice of genetic marker and primer set. Mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI), the standard DNA barcode marker for animals, with its extensive reference library, taxonomic discriminatory power and predictable sequence variation, is the natural choice for many metabarcoding applications. However, for targeting specific taxonomic groups in environmental samples, the utility of COI has yet to be fully scrutinized.
Here, by using a case study of marine and freshwater fishes from the British Isles, we quantify the in silico performance of twelve primer pairs from four mitochondrial loci – COI, cytochrome b, 12S and 16S – in terms of reference library coverage, taxonomic discriminatory power and primer universality. We subsequently test in vitro four primer pairs – three COI and one 12S – for their specificity, reproducibility, and congruence with independent datasets derived from traditional survey methods at five estuarine and coastal sites around the English Channel and North Sea.
Our results show that for aqueous extra‐organismal DNA at low template concentrations, both metazoan‐targeted and fish‐targeted COI primers perform poorly in comparison to 12S, exhibiting low levels of reproducibility due to non‐specific amplification of prokaryotic and non‐target eukaryotic DNAs.
An ideal metabarcode would have an extensive reference library upon which custom primers could be designed, either for broad assessments of biodiversity, or taxon specific surveys. Such a database is available for COI, but low primer specificity hinders practical application, while conversely, 12S primers offer high specificity, but lack adequate references. The latter, however, can be mitigated by expanding the concept of DNA barcodes to include whole mitochondrial genomes generated by genome‐skimming existing tissue collections.
Text
Collins_etal_eDNAmetabarcoding_MEE2019_Accepted
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 9 July 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 2 August 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 435319
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/435319
ISSN: 2041-210X
PURE UUID: 0d7e4051-8007-45d8-a2a5-d9dfd03eb9a6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Oct 2019 17:30
Last modified: 19 Jun 2024 01:45
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Rupert A. Collins
Author:
Judith Bakker
Author:
Owen S. Wangensteen
Author:
Ana Z. Soto
Author:
Laura Corrigan
Author:
Martin J. Genner
Author:
Stefano Mariani
Author:
Douglas Yu
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics