The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The rationales, reasoning and methodology underpinning the judicial recognition of principles of union law

The rationales, reasoning and methodology underpinning the judicial recognition of principles of union law
The rationales, reasoning and methodology underpinning the judicial recognition of principles of union law
The legal principles discourse has long been established, existing at theforefront of legal development, both legislative and judicial; in an area asrelatively young as EU law, it continues to thrive largely as a consequenceof conceptual, methodological and normative ambiguities. Setting out theneed — as will become clear — for methodological clarity in terms ofthe judicial recognition of principles, this article aims to contribute to thehorizontal dimensions of the discourse by exploring the origins and natureof Union principles, and the rationales and methodology underpinning theiridentification by the CJEU. It proposes a classificatory distinction betweena “principle common to the laws of the Member States (and other legalorders)” and a “general principle” and examines the added value of thistaxonomical distinction, particularly in light of the use of principles asmechanisms of European legal development. Each strand of analysis isundertaken with reference to concrete examples of principles identified bythe CJEU, within and “beyond the Treaties
11-38
Law, Stephanie
0778fc4b-cdf4-436e-9fcb-7f2ee2006ca4
Law, Stephanie
0778fc4b-cdf4-436e-9fcb-7f2ee2006ca4

Law, Stephanie (2016) The rationales, reasoning and methodology underpinning the judicial recognition of principles of union law. Cahiers de Droit Européen, 2016 (1), 11-38.

Record type: Article

Abstract

The legal principles discourse has long been established, existing at theforefront of legal development, both legislative and judicial; in an area asrelatively young as EU law, it continues to thrive largely as a consequenceof conceptual, methodological and normative ambiguities. Setting out theneed — as will become clear — for methodological clarity in terms ofthe judicial recognition of principles, this article aims to contribute to thehorizontal dimensions of the discourse by exploring the origins and natureof Union principles, and the rationales and methodology underpinning theiridentification by the CJEU. It proposes a classificatory distinction betweena “principle common to the laws of the Member States (and other legalorders)” and a “general principle” and examines the added value of thistaxonomical distinction, particularly in light of the use of principles asmechanisms of European legal development. Each strand of analysis isundertaken with reference to concrete examples of principles identified bythe CJEU, within and “beyond the Treaties

Text
2016_Law_The Rationales, Reasoning and Methodology Underpinning the Judicial Recognition of Principles of Union Law (Proof) - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 2016

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 435328
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/435328
PURE UUID: a78e4820-94af-46f3-9282-9ed2e17f2268
ORCID for Stephanie Law: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2551-7615

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Oct 2019 17:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:58

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×