The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

An evaluation of the TARGET Antibiotics Toolkit (Treat Antibiotics Responsibly; Guidance, Education, Tools) to improve antimicrobial stewardship in primary care - is it fit for purpose?

An evaluation of the TARGET Antibiotics Toolkit (Treat Antibiotics Responsibly; Guidance, Education, Tools) to improve antimicrobial stewardship in primary care - is it fit for purpose?
An evaluation of the TARGET Antibiotics Toolkit (Treat Antibiotics Responsibly; Guidance, Education, Tools) to improve antimicrobial stewardship in primary care - is it fit for purpose?
BACKGROUND: The TARGET (Treat Antibiotics Responsibly; Guidance, Education, Tools) Antibiotics Toolkit aims to improve antimicrobial prescribing in primary care through guidance, interactive workshops with action planning, patient facing educational and audit materials. OBJECTIVE: To explore GPs', nurses' and other stakeholders' views of TARGET. DESIGN: Mixed methods. METHOD: In 2014, 40 UK GP staff and 13 stakeholders participated in interviews or focus groups. We analysed data using a thematic framework and normalization process theory (NPT). RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-nine workshop participants completed evaluation forms, and 40 GP staff, 4 trainers and 9 relevant stakeholders participated in interviews (29) or focus groups (24). GP staffs were aware of the issues around antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and how it related to their prescribing. Most participants stated that TARGET as a whole was useful. Participants suggested the workshop needed less background on AMR, be centred around clinical cases and allow more action planning time. Participants particularly valued comparison of their practice antibiotic prescribing with others and the TARGET Treating Your Infection leaflet. The leaflet needed greater accessibility via GP computer systems. Due to time, cost, accessibility and competing priorities, many GP staff had not fully utilized all resources, especially the audit and educational materials. CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence that the workshop is likely to be more acceptable and engaging if based around clinical scenarios, with less on AMR and more time on action planning. Greater promotion of TARGET, through Clinical Commissioning Group's (CCG's) and professional bodies, may improve uptake. Patient facing resources should be made accessible through computer shortcuts built into general practice software.
0263-2136
461-467
Jones, Leah
72ab5964-52a6-416e-adee-34ef97cf2724
Hawking, Meredith
aa092ed4-6382-4a55-b969-45f470b5abe5
Owens, Rebecca
384bbfa3-c233-49cf-a755-e23d9df5850e
Lecky, Donna
dadf7543-2c9d-4adb-8644-46682f0871c1
Francis, Nick
9b610883-605c-4fee-871d-defaa86ccf8e
Butler, Christopher
8bf4cace-c34a-4b65-838f-29c2be91e434
Gal, Micaela
2d266726-f171-4a55-a381-29c5a2e42ec1
McNulty, Cliodna
212425d9-06ca-4ef8-9982-1acbd579c8ee
Jones, Leah
72ab5964-52a6-416e-adee-34ef97cf2724
Hawking, Meredith
aa092ed4-6382-4a55-b969-45f470b5abe5
Owens, Rebecca
384bbfa3-c233-49cf-a755-e23d9df5850e
Lecky, Donna
dadf7543-2c9d-4adb-8644-46682f0871c1
Francis, Nick
9b610883-605c-4fee-871d-defaa86ccf8e
Butler, Christopher
8bf4cace-c34a-4b65-838f-29c2be91e434
Gal, Micaela
2d266726-f171-4a55-a381-29c5a2e42ec1
McNulty, Cliodna
212425d9-06ca-4ef8-9982-1acbd579c8ee

Jones, Leah, Hawking, Meredith, Owens, Rebecca, Lecky, Donna, Francis, Nick, Butler, Christopher, Gal, Micaela and McNulty, Cliodna (2018) An evaluation of the TARGET Antibiotics Toolkit (Treat Antibiotics Responsibly; Guidance, Education, Tools) to improve antimicrobial stewardship in primary care - is it fit for purpose? Family Practice, 35 (4), 461-467. (doi:10.1093/fampra/cmx131).

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The TARGET (Treat Antibiotics Responsibly; Guidance, Education, Tools) Antibiotics Toolkit aims to improve antimicrobial prescribing in primary care through guidance, interactive workshops with action planning, patient facing educational and audit materials. OBJECTIVE: To explore GPs', nurses' and other stakeholders' views of TARGET. DESIGN: Mixed methods. METHOD: In 2014, 40 UK GP staff and 13 stakeholders participated in interviews or focus groups. We analysed data using a thematic framework and normalization process theory (NPT). RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-nine workshop participants completed evaluation forms, and 40 GP staff, 4 trainers and 9 relevant stakeholders participated in interviews (29) or focus groups (24). GP staffs were aware of the issues around antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and how it related to their prescribing. Most participants stated that TARGET as a whole was useful. Participants suggested the workshop needed less background on AMR, be centred around clinical cases and allow more action planning time. Participants particularly valued comparison of their practice antibiotic prescribing with others and the TARGET Treating Your Infection leaflet. The leaflet needed greater accessibility via GP computer systems. Due to time, cost, accessibility and competing priorities, many GP staff had not fully utilized all resources, especially the audit and educational materials. CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence that the workshop is likely to be more acceptable and engaging if based around clinical scenarios, with less on AMR and more time on action planning. Greater promotion of TARGET, through Clinical Commissioning Group's (CCG's) and professional bodies, may improve uptake. Patient facing resources should be made accessible through computer shortcuts built into general practice software.

Text
cmx131 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (481kB)

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 28 December 2017
Published date: 1 August 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 435422
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/435422
ISSN: 0263-2136
PURE UUID: 05c2db40-7f5b-45d3-8a77-7944b560bd0c
ORCID for Nick Francis: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8939-7312

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Nov 2019 17:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:58

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Leah Jones
Author: Meredith Hawking
Author: Rebecca Owens
Author: Donna Lecky
Author: Nick Francis ORCID iD
Author: Christopher Butler
Author: Micaela Gal
Author: Cliodna McNulty

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×