The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Choice of empirical antibiotic therapy and adverse outcomes in older adults with suspected urinary tract infection: cohort study

Choice of empirical antibiotic therapy and adverse outcomes in older adults with suspected urinary tract infection: cohort study
Choice of empirical antibiotic therapy and adverse outcomes in older adults with suspected urinary tract infection: cohort study
Background Nitrofurantoin is widely recommended for empirical treatment of urinary tract infection (UTI) but primary care clinicians may prescribe alternative antibiotics to improve prognosis in older, sicker patients. We assessed if prescribing alternative antibiotics was associated with reduced risk of adverse outcomes in older patients. Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients aged ?65 years empirically treated for a UTI with nitrofurantoin, cefalexin, ciprofloxacin or co-amoxiclav. We matched patients on their propensity to receive a nitrofurantoin prescription and used mixed effects logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for re-consultation and re-prescription (proxy for treatment failure), hospitalisation for UTI, sepsis, or acute kidney injury (AKI), and death. Results We identified 42,298 patients aged ?65 years prescribed empirical nitrofurantoin, cefalexin, ciprofloxacin or co-amoxiclav for a UTI. Compared to nitrofurantoin, patients prescribed cefalexin, ciprofloxacin or co-amoxiclav had lower odds of re-consultation and re-prescription (OR for cefalexin; 0.85 95% CI 0.75-0.98; OR for ciprofloxacin; 0.48, 95% CI 0.38-0.61, OR for co-amoxiclav; 0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.93). Patients prescribed cefalexin or ciprofloxacin had greater odds of hospitalisation for sepsis (OR for cefalexin; 1.89, 95% CI 1.03-3.47; OR for ciprofloxacin 3.21, 95% CI 1.59 ? 6.50), and patients prescribed cefalexin had greater odds of death (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.12-1.85). Conclusions Compared to nitrofurantoin, prescribing of alternative antibiotics for UTI in older people may be associated with lower rates of treatment failure but was not associated with reduced risk of UTI-related hospitalisation or death.
Ahmed, Haroon
880dac61-6070-4e31-9d09-ed7dbbf9a5cf
Farewell, Daniel
bb0b8839-4fd9-418d-976f-f732002b2f8d
Francis, Nick A.
9b610883-605c-4fee-871d-defaa86ccf8e
Paranjothy, Shantini
04acae3d-1dba-48ee-80e4-6f4b85cb8043
Butler, Christopher C.
8bf4cace-c34a-4b65-838f-29c2be91e434
Ahmed, Haroon
880dac61-6070-4e31-9d09-ed7dbbf9a5cf
Farewell, Daniel
bb0b8839-4fd9-418d-976f-f732002b2f8d
Francis, Nick A.
9b610883-605c-4fee-871d-defaa86ccf8e
Paranjothy, Shantini
04acae3d-1dba-48ee-80e4-6f4b85cb8043
Butler, Christopher C.
8bf4cace-c34a-4b65-838f-29c2be91e434

Ahmed, Haroon, Farewell, Daniel, Francis, Nick A., Paranjothy, Shantini and Butler, Christopher C. (2019) Choice of empirical antibiotic therapy and adverse outcomes in older adults with suspected urinary tract infection: cohort study. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 6 (3). (doi:10.1093/ofid/ofz039).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background Nitrofurantoin is widely recommended for empirical treatment of urinary tract infection (UTI) but primary care clinicians may prescribe alternative antibiotics to improve prognosis in older, sicker patients. We assessed if prescribing alternative antibiotics was associated with reduced risk of adverse outcomes in older patients. Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients aged ?65 years empirically treated for a UTI with nitrofurantoin, cefalexin, ciprofloxacin or co-amoxiclav. We matched patients on their propensity to receive a nitrofurantoin prescription and used mixed effects logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for re-consultation and re-prescription (proxy for treatment failure), hospitalisation for UTI, sepsis, or acute kidney injury (AKI), and death. Results We identified 42,298 patients aged ?65 years prescribed empirical nitrofurantoin, cefalexin, ciprofloxacin or co-amoxiclav for a UTI. Compared to nitrofurantoin, patients prescribed cefalexin, ciprofloxacin or co-amoxiclav had lower odds of re-consultation and re-prescription (OR for cefalexin; 0.85 95% CI 0.75-0.98; OR for ciprofloxacin; 0.48, 95% CI 0.38-0.61, OR for co-amoxiclav; 0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.93). Patients prescribed cefalexin or ciprofloxacin had greater odds of hospitalisation for sepsis (OR for cefalexin; 1.89, 95% CI 1.03-3.47; OR for ciprofloxacin 3.21, 95% CI 1.59 ? 6.50), and patients prescribed cefalexin had greater odds of death (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.12-1.85). Conclusions Compared to nitrofurantoin, prescribing of alternative antibiotics for UTI in older people may be associated with lower rates of treatment failure but was not associated with reduced risk of UTI-related hospitalisation or death.

Text
ofz039 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (242kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 17 January 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 January 2019
Published date: 1 March 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 435518
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/435518
PURE UUID: 1b8f2c0e-d7fd-48bb-9ee8-f67c37097ca1
ORCID for Nick A. Francis: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8939-7312

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Nov 2019 17:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:58

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Haroon Ahmed
Author: Daniel Farewell
Author: Nick A. Francis ORCID iD
Author: Shantini Paranjothy
Author: Christopher C. Butler

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×