Resolving relationships between several Neolithic and Mesolithic populations in Northern Eurasia using geometric morphometrics
Resolving relationships between several Neolithic and Mesolithic populations in Northern Eurasia using geometric morphometrics
Objectives
Remains from several Eastern European and Siberian Mesolithic and Neolithic sites are analysed to clarify their biological relationships. We assume that groups' geographical distances correlate with genetic and, therefore, morphological distances between them.
Materials and Methods
Material includes complete male crania from several Mesolithic and Neolithic burial sites across Northern Eurasia and from several modern populations. Geometric morphometrics and multivariate statistical techniques are applied to explore morphological trends, group distances, and correlations with their geographical position, climate, and the time of origin.
Results
Despite an overlap in the morphology among the modern and archeological groups, some of them show significant morphological distances. Geographical parameters account for only a small proportion of cranial variation in the sample, with larger variance explained by geography and age together. Expectations of isolation by distance are met in some but not in all cases. Climate accounts for a large proportion of autocorrelation with geography. Nearest‐neighbor joining trees demonstrate group relationships predicted by the regression on geography and on climate.
Discussion
The obtained results are discussed in application to relationships between particular groups. Unlike the Ukrainian Mesolithic, the Yuzhny Oleni Ostrov Mesolithic displays a high morphological affinity with several groups from Northern Eurasia of both European and Asian origin. A possibility of a common substrate for the Yuzhny Oleni Ostrov Mesolithic and Siberian Neolithic groups is reviewed. The Siberian Neolithic is shown to have morphological connection with both modern Siberian groups and the Native North Americans.
cranium, geometric morphometrics, Mesolithic, Neolithic, population history
163-183
Stansfield (Bulygina), Ekaterina
e193434d-2fa2-4c87-860b-4722ff207596
Rasskasova, Anna
7f2b76fa-a4b2-4b45-bf11-e54fa8d761b3
Berezina, Natalia
eeb55887-ca45-4b3b-8279-f39e9fe8242a
Soficaru, Andrei D.
2fbb819e-7c20-47dc-8fdb-c60ca26c4623
September 2017
Stansfield (Bulygina), Ekaterina
e193434d-2fa2-4c87-860b-4722ff207596
Rasskasova, Anna
7f2b76fa-a4b2-4b45-bf11-e54fa8d761b3
Berezina, Natalia
eeb55887-ca45-4b3b-8279-f39e9fe8242a
Soficaru, Andrei D.
2fbb819e-7c20-47dc-8fdb-c60ca26c4623
Stansfield (Bulygina), Ekaterina, Rasskasova, Anna, Berezina, Natalia and Soficaru, Andrei D.
(2017)
Resolving relationships between several Neolithic and Mesolithic populations in Northern Eurasia using geometric morphometrics.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 164 (1), .
(doi:10.1002/ajpa.23264).
Abstract
Objectives
Remains from several Eastern European and Siberian Mesolithic and Neolithic sites are analysed to clarify their biological relationships. We assume that groups' geographical distances correlate with genetic and, therefore, morphological distances between them.
Materials and Methods
Material includes complete male crania from several Mesolithic and Neolithic burial sites across Northern Eurasia and from several modern populations. Geometric morphometrics and multivariate statistical techniques are applied to explore morphological trends, group distances, and correlations with their geographical position, climate, and the time of origin.
Results
Despite an overlap in the morphology among the modern and archeological groups, some of them show significant morphological distances. Geographical parameters account for only a small proportion of cranial variation in the sample, with larger variance explained by geography and age together. Expectations of isolation by distance are met in some but not in all cases. Climate accounts for a large proportion of autocorrelation with geography. Nearest‐neighbor joining trees demonstrate group relationships predicted by the regression on geography and on climate.
Discussion
The obtained results are discussed in application to relationships between particular groups. Unlike the Ukrainian Mesolithic, the Yuzhny Oleni Ostrov Mesolithic displays a high morphological affinity with several groups from Northern Eurasia of both European and Asian origin. A possibility of a common substrate for the Yuzhny Oleni Ostrov Mesolithic and Siberian Neolithic groups is reviewed. The Siberian Neolithic is shown to have morphological connection with both modern Siberian groups and the Native North Americans.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 27 May 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 22 June 2017
Published date: September 2017
Keywords:
cranium, geometric morphometrics, Mesolithic, Neolithic, population history
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 435527
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/435527
ISSN: 0002-9483
PURE UUID: 31c21dbc-0f88-4975-8509-fc940aebd404
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 08 Nov 2019 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:54
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Ekaterina Stansfield (Bulygina)
Author:
Anna Rasskasova
Author:
Natalia Berezina
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics