The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Oral steroids for hearing loss associated with otitis media with effusion in children aged 2-8 years: the OSTRICH RCT

Oral steroids for hearing loss associated with otitis media with effusion in children aged 2-8 years: the OSTRICH RCT
Oral steroids for hearing loss associated with otitis media with effusion in children aged 2-8 years: the OSTRICH RCT
Background: children with hearing loss associated with otitis media with effusion (OME) are commonly managed through surgical intervention, hearing aids or watchful waiting. A safe, inexpensive, effective medical treatment would enhance treatment options. Small, poorly conducted trials have found a short-term benefit from oral steroids.

Objective: to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a 7-day course of oral steroids in improving hearing at 5 weeks in children with persistent OME symptoms and current bilateral OME and hearing loss demonstrated by audiometry.

Design: double-blind, individually randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
Setting: ear, nose and throat outpatient or paediatric audiology and audiovestibular medicine clinics in Wales and England.

Participants: children aged 2–8 years, with symptoms of hearing loss attributable to OME for at least 3 months, a diagnosis of bilateral OME made on the day of recruitment and audiometry-confirmed hearing loss.

Interventions: a 7-day course of oral soluble prednisolone, as a single daily dose of 20 mg for children aged 2–5 years or 30 mg for 6- to 8-year-olds, or matched placebo.

Main outcome measures: acceptable hearing at 5 weeks from randomisation. Secondary outcomes comprised acceptable hearing at 6 and 12 months, tympanometry, otoscopic findings, health-care consultations related to OME and other resource use, proportion of children who had ventilation tube (grommet) surgery at 6 and 12 months, adverse effects, symptoms, functional health status, health-related quality of life, short- and longer-term cost-effectiveness.

Results: a total of 389 children were randomised. Satisfactory hearing at 5 weeks was achieved by 39.9% and 32.8% in the oral steroid and placebo groups, respectively (absolute difference of 7.1%, 95% confidence interval –2.8% to 16.8%; number needed to treat = 14). This difference was not statistically significant. The secondary outcomes were consistent with the picture of a small or no benefit, and we found no subgroups that achieved a meaningful benefit from oral steroids. The economic analysis showed that treatment with oral steroids was more expensive and accrued fewer quality-adjusted life-years than treatment as usual. However, the differences were small and not statistically significant, and the sensitivity analyses demonstrated large variation in the results.

Conclusions: OME in children with documented hearing loss and attributable symptoms for at least 3 months has a high rate of spontaneous resolution. Discussions about watchful waiting and other interventions will be enhanced by this evidence. The findings of this study suggest that any benefit from a short course of oral steroids for OME is likely to be small and of questionable clinical significance, and that the treatment is unlikely to be cost-effective and, therefore, their use cannot be recommended.
1366-5278
Francis, Nick A
9b610883-605c-4fee-871d-defaa86ccf8e
Waldron, Cherry-Ann
74f893bb-7b67-4f67-b598-7d598cfd4085
Cannings-John, Rebecca
f45c9562-b1d0-4c6d-9c7c-8f27cd3e47cd
Thomas-Jones, Emma
ea15d5ac-8232-4823-ab40-17bec0968520
Winfield, Thomas
7195c865-c78e-4d68-9207-bd7185207972
Shepherd, Victoria
b0622fcc-79c1-4a83-8457-ec5ae3911bb3
Harris, Debbie
60588324-3deb-4ea7-b1b0-4ff40db466db
Hood, Kerenza
af7cf839-ca85-4ea9-83c3-3dd31be88b32
Fitzsimmons, Deborah
4e282651-162f-48f0-bbf7-190c265279f2
Roberts, Amanda
c4a5d206-49c3-4a07-8cfd-5bccf8c93b3b
Powell, Colin VE
f8523a1e-eac3-46e2-a866-f4fd160b0470
Gal, Micaela
2d266726-f171-4a55-a381-29c5a2e42ec1
Jones, Sarah
a1745f2a-0a1a-4167-8d2d-52c49eafeb3a
Butler, Christopher C
8bf4cace-c34a-4b65-838f-29c2be91e434
Francis, Nick A
9b610883-605c-4fee-871d-defaa86ccf8e
Waldron, Cherry-Ann
74f893bb-7b67-4f67-b598-7d598cfd4085
Cannings-John, Rebecca
f45c9562-b1d0-4c6d-9c7c-8f27cd3e47cd
Thomas-Jones, Emma
ea15d5ac-8232-4823-ab40-17bec0968520
Winfield, Thomas
7195c865-c78e-4d68-9207-bd7185207972
Shepherd, Victoria
b0622fcc-79c1-4a83-8457-ec5ae3911bb3
Harris, Debbie
60588324-3deb-4ea7-b1b0-4ff40db466db
Hood, Kerenza
af7cf839-ca85-4ea9-83c3-3dd31be88b32
Fitzsimmons, Deborah
4e282651-162f-48f0-bbf7-190c265279f2
Roberts, Amanda
c4a5d206-49c3-4a07-8cfd-5bccf8c93b3b
Powell, Colin VE
f8523a1e-eac3-46e2-a866-f4fd160b0470
Gal, Micaela
2d266726-f171-4a55-a381-29c5a2e42ec1
Jones, Sarah
a1745f2a-0a1a-4167-8d2d-52c49eafeb3a
Butler, Christopher C
8bf4cace-c34a-4b65-838f-29c2be91e434

Francis, Nick A, Waldron, Cherry-Ann, Cannings-John, Rebecca, Thomas-Jones, Emma, Winfield, Thomas, Shepherd, Victoria, Harris, Debbie, Hood, Kerenza, Fitzsimmons, Deborah, Roberts, Amanda, Powell, Colin VE, Gal, Micaela, Jones, Sarah and Butler, Christopher C (2018) Oral steroids for hearing loss associated with otitis media with effusion in children aged 2-8 years: the OSTRICH RCT. Health Technology Assessment, 22. (doi:10.3310/hta22610).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: children with hearing loss associated with otitis media with effusion (OME) are commonly managed through surgical intervention, hearing aids or watchful waiting. A safe, inexpensive, effective medical treatment would enhance treatment options. Small, poorly conducted trials have found a short-term benefit from oral steroids.

Objective: to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a 7-day course of oral steroids in improving hearing at 5 weeks in children with persistent OME symptoms and current bilateral OME and hearing loss demonstrated by audiometry.

Design: double-blind, individually randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
Setting: ear, nose and throat outpatient or paediatric audiology and audiovestibular medicine clinics in Wales and England.

Participants: children aged 2–8 years, with symptoms of hearing loss attributable to OME for at least 3 months, a diagnosis of bilateral OME made on the day of recruitment and audiometry-confirmed hearing loss.

Interventions: a 7-day course of oral soluble prednisolone, as a single daily dose of 20 mg for children aged 2–5 years or 30 mg for 6- to 8-year-olds, or matched placebo.

Main outcome measures: acceptable hearing at 5 weeks from randomisation. Secondary outcomes comprised acceptable hearing at 6 and 12 months, tympanometry, otoscopic findings, health-care consultations related to OME and other resource use, proportion of children who had ventilation tube (grommet) surgery at 6 and 12 months, adverse effects, symptoms, functional health status, health-related quality of life, short- and longer-term cost-effectiveness.

Results: a total of 389 children were randomised. Satisfactory hearing at 5 weeks was achieved by 39.9% and 32.8% in the oral steroid and placebo groups, respectively (absolute difference of 7.1%, 95% confidence interval –2.8% to 16.8%; number needed to treat = 14). This difference was not statistically significant. The secondary outcomes were consistent with the picture of a small or no benefit, and we found no subgroups that achieved a meaningful benefit from oral steroids. The economic analysis showed that treatment with oral steroids was more expensive and accrued fewer quality-adjusted life-years than treatment as usual. However, the differences were small and not statistically significant, and the sensitivity analyses demonstrated large variation in the results.

Conclusions: OME in children with documented hearing loss and attributable symptoms for at least 3 months has a high rate of spontaneous resolution. Discussions about watchful waiting and other interventions will be enhanced by this evidence. The findings of this study suggest that any benefit from a short course of oral steroids for OME is likely to be small and of questionable clinical significance, and that the treatment is unlikely to be cost-effective and, therefore, their use cannot be recommended.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 November 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 435558
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/435558
ISSN: 1366-5278
PURE UUID: a9df0b84-4e8f-4ebd-badb-d991ab33fc36
ORCID for Nick A Francis: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8939-7312

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Nov 2019 17:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:58

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nick A Francis ORCID iD
Author: Cherry-Ann Waldron
Author: Rebecca Cannings-John
Author: Emma Thomas-Jones
Author: Thomas Winfield
Author: Victoria Shepherd
Author: Debbie Harris
Author: Kerenza Hood
Author: Deborah Fitzsimmons
Author: Amanda Roberts
Author: Colin VE Powell
Author: Micaela Gal
Author: Sarah Jones
Author: Christopher C Butler

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×