The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Privatizing welfare. Changing the face of social protection and democracy in Europe

Privatizing welfare. Changing the face of social protection and democracy in Europe
Privatizing welfare. Changing the face of social protection and democracy in Europe
In their publication entitled ëA Done Deal? The EUís Legitimacy Conundrum Revisitedí, Eriksen and Fossum (2007, p._17) conclude by outlining the profound challenges that are haunting contemporary Europe. These range from ëovercoming nationalism without doing away with solidarityí and ëestablishing a single market Ö without abolishing the welfare stateí, to ëachieving unity and collective action without glossing over difference and diversityí and ëachieving efficiency and productivity without compromising rights and democratic legitimacyí.This chapter takes up the last of these conundrums by exploring the democratic challenges for Europe raised by attempts to reconcile European welfare systems with the dictates of Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) and the European Single Market. It also examines the intractable and often contradictory goals of those European welfare regimes themselves. The principle objective of welfare has traditionally been to provide basic economic security for citizens by protecting them from market risks associated with unemployment, old age and sickness. However, norms about the need for protection have shifted significantly since the 1980s and new risks have emerged, particularly with the global financial crisis of 2008. ëSocial inclusioní or the ability to participate and be fully included in society has also become an important objective for the EU and many of its member states. Yet the extent to which these different goals are achievable, or indeed compatible, remain issues for debate.This study analyses some of the unanticipated consequences of the increased role of the private and voluntary sectors in the welfare regimes of OECD countries.
134-167
Edward Elgar Publishing
Altman, Tessa
6d289ad3-f65c-496f-b1b2-07ff5a3e6072
Shore, Cris
1eacd0e1-539f-403e-b22e-fa668e7a7a55
Mayes, David
Michalski, Anna
Altman, Tessa
6d289ad3-f65c-496f-b1b2-07ff5a3e6072
Shore, Cris
1eacd0e1-539f-403e-b22e-fa668e7a7a55
Mayes, David
Michalski, Anna

Altman, Tessa and Shore, Cris (2013) Privatizing welfare. Changing the face of social protection and democracy in Europe. In, Mayes, David and Michalski, Anna (eds.) The changing welfare state in Europe: The implications for democracy. (Social And Political Science) Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 134-167. (doi:10.4337/9781782546573.00014).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

In their publication entitled ëA Done Deal? The EUís Legitimacy Conundrum Revisitedí, Eriksen and Fossum (2007, p._17) conclude by outlining the profound challenges that are haunting contemporary Europe. These range from ëovercoming nationalism without doing away with solidarityí and ëestablishing a single market Ö without abolishing the welfare stateí, to ëachieving unity and collective action without glossing over difference and diversityí and ëachieving efficiency and productivity without compromising rights and democratic legitimacyí.This chapter takes up the last of these conundrums by exploring the democratic challenges for Europe raised by attempts to reconcile European welfare systems with the dictates of Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) and the European Single Market. It also examines the intractable and often contradictory goals of those European welfare regimes themselves. The principle objective of welfare has traditionally been to provide basic economic security for citizens by protecting them from market risks associated with unemployment, old age and sickness. However, norms about the need for protection have shifted significantly since the 1980s and new risks have emerged, particularly with the global financial crisis of 2008. ëSocial inclusioní or the ability to participate and be fully included in society has also become an important objective for the EU and many of its member states. Yet the extent to which these different goals are achievable, or indeed compatible, remain issues for debate.This study analyses some of the unanticipated consequences of the increased role of the private and voluntary sectors in the welfare regimes of OECD countries.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 27 December 2013

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 435611
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/435611
PURE UUID: d8c9364d-96c2-44f5-a8eb-9b278b724fdb
ORCID for Tessa Altman: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5928-603X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Nov 2019 17:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:59

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Tessa Altman ORCID iD
Author: Cris Shore
Editor: David Mayes
Editor: Anna Michalski

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×