The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A randomised controlled trial to compare two coronary pressure wires using simultaneous measurements in human coronary arteries: the COMET trial

A randomised controlled trial to compare two coronary pressure wires using simultaneous measurements in human coronary arteries: the COMET trial
A randomised controlled trial to compare two coronary pressure wires using simultaneous measurements in human coronary arteries: the COMET trial

AIMS: We aimed to examine the relative performance of the new COMET wire from Boston Scientific (BS), and the established technology from St. Jude/Abbott Vascular (SJ).

METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared simultaneous readings from pairs of wires. Patients were randomised to one of three groups: BS/BS, SJ/SJ, or SJ/BS. The last group was sub-randomised to specify the type of wire that would be passed first. After pressure equalisation at the guide catheter, we recorded paired observations in sequence: (a) distal to proximal pressure ratio at baseline, (b) FFR at maximum hyperaemia, and (c) pressure on withdrawal into the guide catheter to quantify "drift". We randomised 106 patients, yielding 288 sets of paired recordings (BS/BS=90; SJ/SJ=90; SJ/BS=108). Drift was recorded from 208 vessels (BS=105; SJ=103). All wires were successfully advanced to their desired positions in the coronary vasculature. The mean (±SD) differences for the randomised pairs were similar: BS/BS=0.0016 (0.023); SJ/SJ=0.002 (0.03); SJ/BS=0.0013 (0.028). The primary outcome tested the hypothesis that the absolute magnitude of the difference (irrespective of sign) observed in the SJ/BS pairing would be similar to that in the SJ/SJ group. The median (IQR) values were SJ/BS=0.015 (0.01-0.03); SJ/SJ=0.01 (0.00-0.03); p=0.61. The drift, expressed as the median (IQR) difference in Pd/Pa from 1.0 (irrespective of sign), was similar: BS=0.02 (0.01-0.05); SJ=0.02 (0.01-0.04); p=0.14.

CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant difference between these wires in terms of safety and performance.

Coronary Vessels, Humans, Hyperemia, Severity of Illness Index
1774-024X
e1578-e1584
Stables, Rod H
81d5cd64-6809-4c77-9b73-3b3c75af5967
Elguindy, Mostafa
d5985a23-ec5f-44b6-96d2-4ff134a822ec
Kemp, Ian
b884bce3-f2dd-4374-81a0-a1c7ddcb64a8
Nicholas, Zoe
98403583-c418-45ad-836b-1831517dcc5f
Mars, Christine
68734957-1ad4-44a9-8604-111235b72201
Mullen, Liam
7319ebcd-73ff-44c9-8b9a-d5cbadc149dc
Curzen, Nick
70f3ea49-51b1-418f-8e56-8210aef1abf4
Stables, Rod H
81d5cd64-6809-4c77-9b73-3b3c75af5967
Elguindy, Mostafa
d5985a23-ec5f-44b6-96d2-4ff134a822ec
Kemp, Ian
b884bce3-f2dd-4374-81a0-a1c7ddcb64a8
Nicholas, Zoe
98403583-c418-45ad-836b-1831517dcc5f
Mars, Christine
68734957-1ad4-44a9-8604-111235b72201
Mullen, Liam
7319ebcd-73ff-44c9-8b9a-d5cbadc149dc
Curzen, Nick
70f3ea49-51b1-418f-8e56-8210aef1abf4

Stables, Rod H, Elguindy, Mostafa, Kemp, Ian, Nicholas, Zoe, Mars, Christine, Mullen, Liam and Curzen, Nick (2019) A randomised controlled trial to compare two coronary pressure wires using simultaneous measurements in human coronary arteries: the COMET trial. EuroIntervention, 14 (15), e1578-e1584. (doi:10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00786).

Record type: Article

Abstract

AIMS: We aimed to examine the relative performance of the new COMET wire from Boston Scientific (BS), and the established technology from St. Jude/Abbott Vascular (SJ).

METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared simultaneous readings from pairs of wires. Patients were randomised to one of three groups: BS/BS, SJ/SJ, or SJ/BS. The last group was sub-randomised to specify the type of wire that would be passed first. After pressure equalisation at the guide catheter, we recorded paired observations in sequence: (a) distal to proximal pressure ratio at baseline, (b) FFR at maximum hyperaemia, and (c) pressure on withdrawal into the guide catheter to quantify "drift". We randomised 106 patients, yielding 288 sets of paired recordings (BS/BS=90; SJ/SJ=90; SJ/BS=108). Drift was recorded from 208 vessels (BS=105; SJ=103). All wires were successfully advanced to their desired positions in the coronary vasculature. The mean (±SD) differences for the randomised pairs were similar: BS/BS=0.0016 (0.023); SJ/SJ=0.002 (0.03); SJ/BS=0.0013 (0.028). The primary outcome tested the hypothesis that the absolute magnitude of the difference (irrespective of sign) observed in the SJ/BS pairing would be similar to that in the SJ/SJ group. The median (IQR) values were SJ/BS=0.015 (0.01-0.03); SJ/SJ=0.01 (0.00-0.03); p=0.61. The drift, expressed as the median (IQR) difference in Pd/Pa from 1.0 (irrespective of sign), was similar: BS=0.02 (0.01-0.05); SJ=0.02 (0.01-0.04); p=0.14.

CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant difference between these wires in terms of safety and performance.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: October 2018
Published date: 8 February 2019
Keywords: Coronary Vessels, Humans, Hyperemia, Severity of Illness Index

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 435745
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/435745
ISSN: 1774-024X
PURE UUID: 3b10ed77-64a3-42c5-ac0d-6dcdc6a2905e
ORCID for Nick Curzen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9651-7829

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Nov 2019 17:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Rod H Stables
Author: Mostafa Elguindy
Author: Ian Kemp
Author: Zoe Nicholas
Author: Christine Mars
Author: Liam Mullen
Author: Nick Curzen ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×