The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A comparison of uniaxial and polyaxial suspended germanium bridges in terms of mechanical stress and thermal management towards a CMOS compatible light source

A comparison of uniaxial and polyaxial suspended germanium bridges in terms of mechanical stress and thermal management towards a CMOS compatible light source
A comparison of uniaxial and polyaxial suspended germanium bridges in terms of mechanical stress and thermal management towards a CMOS compatible light source
Germanium (Ge) is a promising candidate for a CMOS compatible laser diode.This is due to its compatibility with Silicon (Si) and its ability to be converted into a direct band gap material by applying tensile strain. In particular uniaxial suspended Ge bridges have been extensively explored due to their ability to introduce high tensile strain. There have been two recent demonstrations of low-temperature optically-pumped lasing in these bridges but no room temperature operation accredit to insufficient strain and poor thermal management. In this paper we compare uniaxial bridges with polyaxial bridges in terms of mechanical stress and thermal management using Finite Element Modelling (FEM). The stress simulations reveal that polyaxial bridges suffer from extremely large corner stresses which prevent larger strain from being introduced compared with uniaxial bridges. Thermal simulations however reveal that they are much less thermally sensitive than uniaxial bridges which may indicate lower optical losses. Bridges were fabricated and Raman spectroscopy was used to validate the results of the simulations. We postulate that polyaxial bridges could offer many advantages over their uniaxial counterparts as potential laser devices
1094-4087
27846-37858
Burt, Daniel
49c801a2-fb48-40f2-b72f-f713151b96e6
Gonzalez, Jofferson
e7280597-6d21-4025-bf30-19788675f225
Al-Attili, Abdelrahman
534a1c1f-3f8c-4a78-b71b-50c156e23373
Rutt, Harvey
e09fa327-0c01-467a-9898-4e7f0cd715fc
Khokhar, Ali
2eedd1cc-8ac5-4f8e-be25-930bd3eae396
Oda, Katsuya
7a476aa6-20a1-4d0a-938f-99d52720ae68
Gardes, Frederic
7a49fc6d-dade-4099-b016-c60737cb5bb2
Saito, Shinichi
14a5d20b-055e-4f48-9dda-267e88bd3fdc
Burt, Daniel
49c801a2-fb48-40f2-b72f-f713151b96e6
Gonzalez, Jofferson
e7280597-6d21-4025-bf30-19788675f225
Al-Attili, Abdelrahman
534a1c1f-3f8c-4a78-b71b-50c156e23373
Rutt, Harvey
e09fa327-0c01-467a-9898-4e7f0cd715fc
Khokhar, Ali
2eedd1cc-8ac5-4f8e-be25-930bd3eae396
Oda, Katsuya
7a476aa6-20a1-4d0a-938f-99d52720ae68
Gardes, Frederic
7a49fc6d-dade-4099-b016-c60737cb5bb2
Saito, Shinichi
14a5d20b-055e-4f48-9dda-267e88bd3fdc

Burt, Daniel, Gonzalez, Jofferson, Al-Attili, Abdelrahman, Rutt, Harvey, Khokhar, Ali, Oda, Katsuya, Gardes, Frederic and Saito, Shinichi (2019) A comparison of uniaxial and polyaxial suspended germanium bridges in terms of mechanical stress and thermal management towards a CMOS compatible light source. Optics Express, 27 (26), 27846-37858. (doi:10.1364/OE.27.037846).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Germanium (Ge) is a promising candidate for a CMOS compatible laser diode.This is due to its compatibility with Silicon (Si) and its ability to be converted into a direct band gap material by applying tensile strain. In particular uniaxial suspended Ge bridges have been extensively explored due to their ability to introduce high tensile strain. There have been two recent demonstrations of low-temperature optically-pumped lasing in these bridges but no room temperature operation accredit to insufficient strain and poor thermal management. In this paper we compare uniaxial bridges with polyaxial bridges in terms of mechanical stress and thermal management using Finite Element Modelling (FEM). The stress simulations reveal that polyaxial bridges suffer from extremely large corner stresses which prevent larger strain from being introduced compared with uniaxial bridges. Thermal simulations however reveal that they are much less thermally sensitive than uniaxial bridges which may indicate lower optical losses. Bridges were fabricated and Raman spectroscopy was used to validate the results of the simulations. We postulate that polyaxial bridges could offer many advantages over their uniaxial counterparts as potential laser devices

Text
A_comparison_of_uniaxial_and_polyaxial_suspended_germanium_bridges_in_terms_of_mechanical_stress_and_thermal_management_towards_a_CMOS_compatible___1_ FINAL
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (4MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 8 November 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 December 2019
Published date: 23 December 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 435939
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/435939
ISSN: 1094-4087
PURE UUID: aea54f9b-7c97-42f6-8159-43e01f5d0f2c
ORCID for Frederic Gardes: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1400-3272
ORCID for Shinichi Saito: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1539-1182

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Nov 2019 17:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:29

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Daniel Burt
Author: Jofferson Gonzalez
Author: Abdelrahman Al-Attili
Author: Harvey Rutt
Author: Ali Khokhar
Author: Katsuya Oda
Author: Frederic Gardes ORCID iD
Author: Shinichi Saito ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×