Supporting authoring of multiple-choice questions in human-computer-interaction using PeerWise
Supporting authoring of multiple-choice questions in human-computer-interaction using PeerWise
PeerWise is a web-based, free software that supports authoring, sharing, answering, evaluating and discussing multiple-choice questions (MCQ). Students can author questions, as well as answer and rate questions generated by their peers. In doing so, they can gain badges for reaching specific milestones related to their engagement (in authoring, answering, and commenting on questions). Lecturers can keep track of students’ participation.Aim: Can we support assessment in non-STEM subjects via student-authored MCQ software such as PeerWise?Observations: The majority of questions were authored and answered directly prior to the two participation deadlines; significant use of PeerWise as a tool for exam revision; minimum effort approach by some students brought down overall question quality; students felt there was a lack of moderation from facilitators of question quality; badges motivated some (but not all) students.
PeerWise, Assessment, Students, MCQ
Snow, Steve
475bccef-a436-476f-ab42-a3581be78de8
Wilde, Adriana Gabriela
4f9174fe-482a-4114-8e81-79b835946224
14 September 2017
Snow, Steve
475bccef-a436-476f-ab42-a3581be78de8
Wilde, Adriana Gabriela
4f9174fe-482a-4114-8e81-79b835946224
Snow, Steve and Wilde, Adriana Gabriela
(2017)
Supporting authoring of multiple-choice questions in human-computer-interaction using PeerWise.
What Works in Assessment and Feedback: Simply Better, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
14 Sep 2017.
1 pp
.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Poster)
Abstract
PeerWise is a web-based, free software that supports authoring, sharing, answering, evaluating and discussing multiple-choice questions (MCQ). Students can author questions, as well as answer and rate questions generated by their peers. In doing so, they can gain badges for reaching specific milestones related to their engagement (in authoring, answering, and commenting on questions). Lecturers can keep track of students’ participation.Aim: Can we support assessment in non-STEM subjects via student-authored MCQ software such as PeerWise?Observations: The majority of questions were authored and answered directly prior to the two participation deadlines; significant use of PeerWise as a tool for exam revision; minimum effort approach by some students brought down overall question quality; students felt there was a lack of moderation from facilitators of question quality; badges motivated some (but not all) students.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 14 September 2017
Venue - Dates:
What Works in Assessment and Feedback: Simply Better, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom, 2017-09-14 - 2017-09-14
Keywords:
PeerWise, Assessment, Students, MCQ
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 436181
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/436181
PURE UUID: 9f84ce36-1c74-4bab-aa79-bc573f3324d8
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Dec 2019 17:30
Last modified: 12 Nov 2024 02:46
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Steve Snow
Author:
Adriana Gabriela Wilde
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics