The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Digital tools for more efficient conduct of RCTs: trials unit survey

Digital tools for more efficient conduct of RCTs: trials unit survey
Digital tools for more efficient conduct of RCTs: trials unit survey
Introduction: Recruitment of participants to, and their retention in, Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) is a key determinant of research efficiency, but is challenging. Digital tools and media are increasingly used to reduce costs, waste and delays in the conduct and delivery of research. The aim of this UK Clinical Trials Unit (CTU) survey was to identify which digital recruitment and retention tools are being used to support RCTs, their benefits and success characteristics.

Methods: A survey was sent to all UK Clinical Research Collaboration(UKCRC)-registered CTUs with a webinar to help increase completion. A logic model and definitions of a “digital tool” were developed by iterative refinement by project team members, the Advisory Board(NIHR Research Design service, NHS Trust, NIHR Clinical Research Net-works and patient input) and CTUs.

Results: A total of 24/52 (46%) CTUs responded, 6 (25%) of which stated no prior use. Database screening tools (e.g. CPRD, EMIS) were the tool most widely used (10/22 45%) for recruitment and were con-side red very effective (7/10 70%). The most mentioned success criteria were saving GP time and reaching more patients. Social media was second (6/22 27%), but estimated effectiveness varied consider-ably, with only 17% stating very effective. Fewer retention tools were used, with SMS / email reminders reported most (10/15 67%), but certainty about effectiveness varied. A table of potential digital tools to support recruitment and retention tasks, with examples and a logic model showing relationships between the resources, activities, outputs and outcomes for digital tools were developed.

Discussion: Database screening tools are the most commonly used digital tool for recruitment, with clear success criteria and certainty about effectiveness. Our detailed definition of what constitutes a digital tool, with examples, will inform the NIHR research community about choices and help them identify potential tools to support recruitment and retention.
1745-6215
Nuttall, Jacqueline
154aec0a-05f2-4379-918e-9c36767fdc4c
Lane, Athene
6683aef1-075d-471f-9c9f-b561a2a3902e
Blatch-Jones, Amanda
6bb7aa9c-776b-4bdd-be4e-cf67abd05652
Griffiths, Gareth
7fd300c0-d279-4ff6-842d-aa1f2b9b864d
Wyatt, Jeremy
c23557ae-f24d-455a-a767-2a2c700869bc
Nuttall, Jacqueline
154aec0a-05f2-4379-918e-9c36767fdc4c
Lane, Athene
6683aef1-075d-471f-9c9f-b561a2a3902e
Blatch-Jones, Amanda
6bb7aa9c-776b-4bdd-be4e-cf67abd05652
Griffiths, Gareth
7fd300c0-d279-4ff6-842d-aa1f2b9b864d
Wyatt, Jeremy
c23557ae-f24d-455a-a767-2a2c700869bc

Nuttall, Jacqueline, Lane, Athene, Blatch-Jones, Amanda, Griffiths, Gareth and Wyatt, Jeremy (2019) Digital tools for more efficient conduct of RCTs: trials unit survey. Trials, 20 (Supplement 1), [P-244]. (doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3688-6).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

Introduction: Recruitment of participants to, and their retention in, Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) is a key determinant of research efficiency, but is challenging. Digital tools and media are increasingly used to reduce costs, waste and delays in the conduct and delivery of research. The aim of this UK Clinical Trials Unit (CTU) survey was to identify which digital recruitment and retention tools are being used to support RCTs, their benefits and success characteristics.

Methods: A survey was sent to all UK Clinical Research Collaboration(UKCRC)-registered CTUs with a webinar to help increase completion. A logic model and definitions of a “digital tool” were developed by iterative refinement by project team members, the Advisory Board(NIHR Research Design service, NHS Trust, NIHR Clinical Research Net-works and patient input) and CTUs.

Results: A total of 24/52 (46%) CTUs responded, 6 (25%) of which stated no prior use. Database screening tools (e.g. CPRD, EMIS) were the tool most widely used (10/22 45%) for recruitment and were con-side red very effective (7/10 70%). The most mentioned success criteria were saving GP time and reaching more patients. Social media was second (6/22 27%), but estimated effectiveness varied consider-ably, with only 17% stating very effective. Fewer retention tools were used, with SMS / email reminders reported most (10/15 67%), but certainty about effectiveness varied. A table of potential digital tools to support recruitment and retention tasks, with examples and a logic model showing relationships between the resources, activities, outputs and outcomes for digital tools were developed.

Discussion: Database screening tools are the most commonly used digital tool for recruitment, with clear success criteria and certainty about effectiveness. Our detailed definition of what constitutes a digital tool, with examples, will inform the NIHR research community about choices and help them identify potential tools to support recruitment and retention.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 October 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 436217
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/436217
ISSN: 1745-6215
PURE UUID: 1ef806f9-d446-4ca9-bf2e-b75970062bb6
ORCID for Amanda Blatch-Jones: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1486-5561
ORCID for Gareth Griffiths: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9579-8021

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Dec 2019 17:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:36

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jacqueline Nuttall
Author: Athene Lane
Author: Jeremy Wyatt

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×