The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Horses for courses? A qualitative exploration of goals formulated in mental health settings by young people, parents, and clinicians

Horses for courses? A qualitative exploration of goals formulated in mental health settings by young people, parents, and clinicians
Horses for courses? A qualitative exploration of goals formulated in mental health settings by young people, parents, and clinicians

Introduction: This research sought to explore and categorise goals set by children and young people, parents/caregivers and jointly by a combination of children/young people, parents/caregivers and/or clinicians within mental health settings across the United Kingdom. 

Method: Using a dataset of 441 goals formed at the outset of 180 treatment episodes (2007-2010) from UK child mental health services using the Goal-Based Outcomes tool, a grounded theory approach was taken, which built on previous research into child-rated goals to develop frameworks for parent and joint goal data which were then compared with the child goal data. 

Results: A total of 19 subthemes and four overarching themes were identified for parent goals. A total of 19 subthemes in five overarching themes were identified for joint goals. These were compared with 25 subthemes and three overarching themes for child goals. A comparison of subthemes between parent, child and joint goals demonstrated many consistencies, but also differences. Most commonly rated goals from children focused on coping with specific difficulties, personal growth and independence. Parent goals focused mainly on managing specific difficulties, parent-specific goals and improving self or life. Jointly negotiated goals focused on parent-specific goals, self-confidence and understanding, hopes for the future and managing specific problems. 

Conclusion: The results suggest that goals may capture areas not captured by other normed outcome measures. In particular, goals may capture higher order, underlying factors, such as confidence, resilience, coping, and parenting factors that may not be explored by other measures. The differences across perspectives also link to existing literature suggesting a different focus on treatment based on perspectives and highlights the potential importance when jointly agreeing goals of ensuring the voice of the child/young person is heard and included in goal setting.

CAMHS, Child Outcomes Research Consortium, Goal-Based Outcomes, Goals, outcomes
1359-1045
208-223
Jacob, Jenna
6e4c34d9-a54f-49d7-91a2-ef19d98443ef
Edbrooke-Childs, Julian
d4028aac-7388-4afa-b0a2-40467eeb757d
Holley, Simone
31ab5e55-d038-4397-a257-687371f945ae
Law, Duncan
4f01269d-109c-45d4-a366-c41b238649f4
Wolpert, Miranda
ee1f7d94-5c7c-4ff2-b4ec-d3eea893b295
Jacob, Jenna
6e4c34d9-a54f-49d7-91a2-ef19d98443ef
Edbrooke-Childs, Julian
d4028aac-7388-4afa-b0a2-40467eeb757d
Holley, Simone
31ab5e55-d038-4397-a257-687371f945ae
Law, Duncan
4f01269d-109c-45d4-a366-c41b238649f4
Wolpert, Miranda
ee1f7d94-5c7c-4ff2-b4ec-d3eea893b295

Jacob, Jenna, Edbrooke-Childs, Julian, Holley, Simone, Law, Duncan and Wolpert, Miranda (2016) Horses for courses? A qualitative exploration of goals formulated in mental health settings by young people, parents, and clinicians. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 21 (2), 208-223. (doi:10.1177/1359104515577487).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction: This research sought to explore and categorise goals set by children and young people, parents/caregivers and jointly by a combination of children/young people, parents/caregivers and/or clinicians within mental health settings across the United Kingdom. 

Method: Using a dataset of 441 goals formed at the outset of 180 treatment episodes (2007-2010) from UK child mental health services using the Goal-Based Outcomes tool, a grounded theory approach was taken, which built on previous research into child-rated goals to develop frameworks for parent and joint goal data which were then compared with the child goal data. 

Results: A total of 19 subthemes and four overarching themes were identified for parent goals. A total of 19 subthemes in five overarching themes were identified for joint goals. These were compared with 25 subthemes and three overarching themes for child goals. A comparison of subthemes between parent, child and joint goals demonstrated many consistencies, but also differences. Most commonly rated goals from children focused on coping with specific difficulties, personal growth and independence. Parent goals focused mainly on managing specific difficulties, parent-specific goals and improving self or life. Jointly negotiated goals focused on parent-specific goals, self-confidence and understanding, hopes for the future and managing specific problems. 

Conclusion: The results suggest that goals may capture areas not captured by other normed outcome measures. In particular, goals may capture higher order, underlying factors, such as confidence, resilience, coping, and parenting factors that may not be explored by other measures. The differences across perspectives also link to existing literature suggesting a different focus on treatment based on perspectives and highlights the potential importance when jointly agreeing goals of ensuring the voice of the child/young person is heard and included in goal setting.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 25 March 2015
Published date: 1 April 2016
Keywords: CAMHS, Child Outcomes Research Consortium, Goal-Based Outcomes, Goals, outcomes

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 436425
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/436425
ISSN: 1359-1045
PURE UUID: 654e2be4-8b14-422c-ad5d-8aa0f92df7e2
ORCID for Simone Holley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4631-2862

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Dec 2019 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 05:29

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jenna Jacob
Author: Julian Edbrooke-Childs
Author: Simone Holley ORCID iD
Author: Duncan Law
Author: Miranda Wolpert

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×