The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Core outcomes in neonatology: development of a core outcome set for neonatal research

Core outcomes in neonatology: development of a core outcome set for neonatal research
Core outcomes in neonatology: development of a core outcome set for neonatal research

BACKGROUND: Neonatal research evaluates many different outcomes using multiple measures. This can prevent synthesis of trial results in meta-analyses, and selected outcomes may not be relevant to former patients, parents and health professionals.

OBJECTIVE: To define a core outcome set (COS) for research involving infants receiving neonatal care in a high-income setting.

DESIGN: Outcomes reported in neonatal trials and qualitative studies were systematically reviewed. Stakeholders were recruited for a three-round international Delphi survey. A consensus meeting was held to confirm the final COS, based on the survey results.

PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred and fourteen former patients, parents, healthcare professionals and researchers took part in the eDelphi survey; 173 completed all three rounds. Sixteen stakeholders participated in the consensus meeting.

RESULTS: The literature reviews identified 104 outcomes; these were included in round 1. Participants proposed 10 additional outcomes; 114 outcomes were scored in rounds 2 and 3. Round 1 scores showed different stakeholder groups prioritised contrasting outcomes. Twelve outcomes were included in the final COS: survival, sepsis, necrotising enterocolitis, brain injury on imaging, general gross motor ability, general cognitive ability, quality of life, adverse events, visual impairment/blindness, hearing impairment/deafness, retinopathy of prematurity and chronic lung disease/bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A COS for clinical trials and other research studies involving infants receiving neonatal care in a high-income setting has been identified. This COS for neonatology will help standardise outcome selection in clinical trials and ensure these are relevant to those most affected by neonatal care.

1359-2998
Webbe, James William Harrison
b27a38fb-0cdf-4c1f-a8d1-6938b5caf9dc
Duffy, James M.N.
52892122-a1e2-4bf8-98dc-c8faf6903e8d
Afonso, Elsa
5360743b-8b8a-40af-8f03-4ca62d903636
Al-Muzaffar, Iyad
ea38cb32-1380-4ea5-9027-08a9c94f8b1a
Brunton, Ginny
d0815901-d179-48ef-9701-45b582d8438e
Greenough, Anne
5fb7521d-ae58-4a58-9a0b-deddcf1647c2
Hall, Nigel J.
6919e8af-3890-42c1-98a7-c110791957cf
Knight, Marian
7cfa08c5-3235-4c6c-b5f9-aa784379d4e0
Latour, Jos M.
a90aa470-950a-41b7-8b19-58d20d6ada4c
Lee-Davey, Caroline
224cff5a-0838-486d-874e-f3e868d67a96
Marlow, Neil
0c6bd3b0-464b-4f04-8dd3-72517da5cbd7
Noakes, Laura
28a39912-82ad-476c-bb2c-2fc1d46ec0b1
Nycyk, Julie
29d0eabf-8ebb-4d4b-bc2b-6d185752e463
Richard-Löndt, Angela
351f5d2c-fc26-42c8-a3b6-187b4b4c7198
Wills-Eve, Ben
2c844247-f60c-43ed-99f0-6dd376ab0086
Modi, Neena
78ed7664-587f-4cc5-83c1-7fbb8f7baf31
Gale, Chris
210b7c81-9a39-460a-9ab3-54fe92a69f8e
Webbe, James William Harrison
b27a38fb-0cdf-4c1f-a8d1-6938b5caf9dc
Duffy, James M.N.
52892122-a1e2-4bf8-98dc-c8faf6903e8d
Afonso, Elsa
5360743b-8b8a-40af-8f03-4ca62d903636
Al-Muzaffar, Iyad
ea38cb32-1380-4ea5-9027-08a9c94f8b1a
Brunton, Ginny
d0815901-d179-48ef-9701-45b582d8438e
Greenough, Anne
5fb7521d-ae58-4a58-9a0b-deddcf1647c2
Hall, Nigel J.
6919e8af-3890-42c1-98a7-c110791957cf
Knight, Marian
7cfa08c5-3235-4c6c-b5f9-aa784379d4e0
Latour, Jos M.
a90aa470-950a-41b7-8b19-58d20d6ada4c
Lee-Davey, Caroline
224cff5a-0838-486d-874e-f3e868d67a96
Marlow, Neil
0c6bd3b0-464b-4f04-8dd3-72517da5cbd7
Noakes, Laura
28a39912-82ad-476c-bb2c-2fc1d46ec0b1
Nycyk, Julie
29d0eabf-8ebb-4d4b-bc2b-6d185752e463
Richard-Löndt, Angela
351f5d2c-fc26-42c8-a3b6-187b4b4c7198
Wills-Eve, Ben
2c844247-f60c-43ed-99f0-6dd376ab0086
Modi, Neena
78ed7664-587f-4cc5-83c1-7fbb8f7baf31
Gale, Chris
210b7c81-9a39-460a-9ab3-54fe92a69f8e

Webbe, James William Harrison, Duffy, James M.N., Afonso, Elsa, Al-Muzaffar, Iyad, Brunton, Ginny, Greenough, Anne, Hall, Nigel J., Knight, Marian, Latour, Jos M., Lee-Davey, Caroline, Marlow, Neil, Noakes, Laura, Nycyk, Julie, Richard-Löndt, Angela, Wills-Eve, Ben, Modi, Neena and Gale, Chris (2019) Core outcomes in neonatology: development of a core outcome set for neonatal research. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition. (doi:10.1136/archdischild-2019-317501).

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neonatal research evaluates many different outcomes using multiple measures. This can prevent synthesis of trial results in meta-analyses, and selected outcomes may not be relevant to former patients, parents and health professionals.

OBJECTIVE: To define a core outcome set (COS) for research involving infants receiving neonatal care in a high-income setting.

DESIGN: Outcomes reported in neonatal trials and qualitative studies were systematically reviewed. Stakeholders were recruited for a three-round international Delphi survey. A consensus meeting was held to confirm the final COS, based on the survey results.

PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred and fourteen former patients, parents, healthcare professionals and researchers took part in the eDelphi survey; 173 completed all three rounds. Sixteen stakeholders participated in the consensus meeting.

RESULTS: The literature reviews identified 104 outcomes; these were included in round 1. Participants proposed 10 additional outcomes; 114 outcomes were scored in rounds 2 and 3. Round 1 scores showed different stakeholder groups prioritised contrasting outcomes. Twelve outcomes were included in the final COS: survival, sepsis, necrotising enterocolitis, brain injury on imaging, general gross motor ability, general cognitive ability, quality of life, adverse events, visual impairment/blindness, hearing impairment/deafness, retinopathy of prematurity and chronic lung disease/bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A COS for clinical trials and other research studies involving infants receiving neonatal care in a high-income setting has been identified. This COS for neonatology will help standardise outcome selection in clinical trials and ensure these are relevant to those most affected by neonatal care.

Text
archdischild-2019-317501.full - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 30 October 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 15 November 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 436431
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/436431
ISSN: 1359-2998
PURE UUID: a915b9d0-d15f-4996-b9b3-d1c71e2f1423
ORCID for Nigel J. Hall: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8570-9374

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Dec 2019 17:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:23

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: James William Harrison Webbe
Author: James M.N. Duffy
Author: Elsa Afonso
Author: Iyad Al-Muzaffar
Author: Ginny Brunton
Author: Anne Greenough
Author: Nigel J. Hall ORCID iD
Author: Marian Knight
Author: Jos M. Latour
Author: Caroline Lee-Davey
Author: Neil Marlow
Author: Laura Noakes
Author: Julie Nycyk
Author: Angela Richard-Löndt
Author: Ben Wills-Eve
Author: Neena Modi
Author: Chris Gale

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×