The role of stiffness variation in switches and crossings: comparison of vehicle-track interaction models with field measurements
The role of stiffness variation in switches and crossings: comparison of vehicle-track interaction models with field measurements
The performance of Switches and Crossings (S&Cs) compared with plain line is complicated by the presence of movable parts, changing rail geometry and non-uniformities in the composite and/or trackbed stiffness. These features lead to complex vehicle-track interactions and higher maintenance costs. The trackbed stiffness is the least well controlled engineering property. A greater variability in trackbed stiffness leads to higher differential trackbed settlement and associated poorer track quality. At S&C changes in trackbed stiffness are exacerbated by changing rail properties which also contribute to changes in the overall composite track stiffness. This work focuses on the role of variations in stiffness on S&C performance. Field measurements of bearer displacement were carried out using geophones at an S&C equipped with Under Sleeper Pads (USPs). Vehicle-S&C interaction was modelled using a multi-body system and finite element method. The trackbed stiffness along the whole of the S&C was inferred using the measurements of track deflections in an iterative back-calculation taking account of changing rail properties. It is shown that not including the variation in trackbed/composite stiffness leads to significant under/overestimates of the wheel-rail contact forces. USPs are shown to reduce absolute maximum loads, but may increase the variation in deflection.
S&C, switch panel, crossing panel, trackbed stiffness, composite track stiffness, field measurements, geophones, vehicle-track interaction, FE approach, MBS approach, USP
Grossoni, Ilaria
e3e9a142-c521-4122-b0f7-660903b3f1a6
Le Pen, Louis
4a38e256-d113-4bba-b0d4-32d41995928a
Jorge, Pedro
e515d79d-0d9a-4b6e-a6e9-740e70290280
Bezin, Yann
ab3c46ce-6068-473f-a8cb-9aef699da669
Watson, Geoff
a7b86a0a-9a2c-44d2-99ed-a6c02b2a356d
Kostovasilis, Dimitrios
fee306d4-b946-4dce-9526-61db29519392
Powrie, William
600c3f02-00f8-4486-ae4b-b4fc8ec77c3c
Grossoni, Ilaria
e3e9a142-c521-4122-b0f7-660903b3f1a6
Le Pen, Louis
4a38e256-d113-4bba-b0d4-32d41995928a
Jorge, Pedro
e515d79d-0d9a-4b6e-a6e9-740e70290280
Bezin, Yann
ab3c46ce-6068-473f-a8cb-9aef699da669
Watson, Geoff
a7b86a0a-9a2c-44d2-99ed-a6c02b2a356d
Kostovasilis, Dimitrios
fee306d4-b946-4dce-9526-61db29519392
Powrie, William
600c3f02-00f8-4486-ae4b-b4fc8ec77c3c
Grossoni, Ilaria, Le Pen, Louis, Jorge, Pedro, Bezin, Yann, Watson, Geoff, Kostovasilis, Dimitrios and Powrie, William
(2019)
The role of stiffness variation in switches and crossings: comparison of vehicle-track interaction models with field measurements.
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit.
(doi:10.1177/0954409719892146).
Abstract
The performance of Switches and Crossings (S&Cs) compared with plain line is complicated by the presence of movable parts, changing rail geometry and non-uniformities in the composite and/or trackbed stiffness. These features lead to complex vehicle-track interactions and higher maintenance costs. The trackbed stiffness is the least well controlled engineering property. A greater variability in trackbed stiffness leads to higher differential trackbed settlement and associated poorer track quality. At S&C changes in trackbed stiffness are exacerbated by changing rail properties which also contribute to changes in the overall composite track stiffness. This work focuses on the role of variations in stiffness on S&C performance. Field measurements of bearer displacement were carried out using geophones at an S&C equipped with Under Sleeper Pads (USPs). Vehicle-S&C interaction was modelled using a multi-body system and finite element method. The trackbed stiffness along the whole of the S&C was inferred using the measurements of track deflections in an iterative back-calculation taking account of changing rail properties. It is shown that not including the variation in trackbed/composite stiffness leads to significant under/overestimates of the wheel-rail contact forces. USPs are shown to reduce absolute maximum loads, but may increase the variation in deflection.
Text
Grossoni_et_al_2019
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 6 October 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 12 December 2019
Keywords:
S&C, switch panel, crossing panel, trackbed stiffness, composite track stiffness, field measurements, geophones, vehicle-track interaction, FE approach, MBS approach, USP
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 436695
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/436695
ISSN: 0954-4097
PURE UUID: d0853fd7-a8b9-4f8a-af9c-21b67cd4695c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Dec 2019 18:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:03
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Ilaria Grossoni
Author:
Pedro Jorge
Author:
Yann Bezin
Author:
Dimitrios Kostovasilis
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics