The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Adding web-based behavioural support to exercise referral schemes for inactive adults with chronic health conditions: the e-coachER Randomised Controlled Trial

Adding web-based behavioural support to exercise referral schemes for inactive adults with chronic health conditions: the e-coachER Randomised Controlled Trial
Adding web-based behavioural support to exercise referral schemes for inactive adults with chronic health conditions: the e-coachER Randomised Controlled Trial
There is modest evidence that exercise referral schemes (ERS) increase physical activity (PA) of inactive individuals with chronic health conditions. There is a need to identify additional ways to improve the effects of ERS on long-term PA.

Objectives: To determine if adding the e-coachER intervention to ERS is more effective and cost-effective in increasing PA after one year, compared to usual ERS.

Design: Pragmatic, multicentre 2 arm randomised trial, with mixed methods process evaluation and health economic analysis. Participants were allocated 1:1 to either ERS plus e-coachER (intervention) or ERS alone (control).

Setting: Patients referred to ERS in Plymouth, Birmingham and Glasgow.

Participants: N = 450, aged 16-74 years, with BMI 30-40, hypertension, pre-diabetes, type 2 diabetes, lower limb osteoarthritis, or a current/recent history of treatment for depression; inactive; contactable via email; and an internet user.

Intervention: e-coachER was designed to augment ERS. Participants received a pedometer and fridge magnet with PA recording sheets, and a User Guide to access the web-based support in the form of 7 Steps to Health. e-coachER aimed to build the use of behavioural skills (e.g. self-monitoring) while strengthening favourable beliefs in importance for doing PA, competence, autonomy in PA choices and relatedness. All participants were referred to a standard ERS programme.

Primary outcome measure: Minutes of moderate and vigorous PA (MVPA) in ≥10 min bouts measured by accelerometer over one week at 12 months, worn ≥16 hours per day for ≥4 days including ≥1 weekend day.

Secondary outcomes: Other accelerometer-derived PA measures, self-reported PA, ERS attendance, EQ-5D-5L and HADS were collected at 4 and 12 months.

Results: Participants had a BMI mean (SD) of 32.6 (4.4), were primarily referred for weight loss, and were mostly confident self-rated IT users. Primary outcome analysis involving those with usable data showed a weak indicative effect in favour of the intervention group (N=108) compared with the control group (N=124); 11.9 weekly minutes MVPA, 95% CI -2.1 to 26.0; p = 0.10. 64% of intervention participants logged on at least once with generally positive feedback on the web-based support. The intervention had no effect on other PA outcomes, ERS attendance (78% v 75% in control and intervention, respectively), EQ-5D-5L or HADS scores, but did enhance a number of process outcomes (i.e. confidence, importance and competence) compared with the control group at 4 months but not at 12 months. At 12 months, compared to control, the intervention group incurred an additional mean cost of £439 (95% CI £-182, £1060) but generated more mean quality adjusted life years (QALYs); (0.026, 95% CI 0.013, 0.040) with an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of additional £16,885 per QALY.

Limitations: A significant proportion (46%) of participants were not included in the primary analysis, due to study withdrawal, and insufficient device wear time and the results must be interpreted with caution. The regression model fit for the primary outcome was poor, because of the considerable proportion of participants (142/243 (58%)) who recorded zero minutes of ≥10 minute bouted MVPA at 12 months.

Future work:
The design and rigorous evaluation of cost-effective and scalable ways to increase ERS uptake and maintenance of MVPA are needed among patients with chronic conditions.

Conclusion: Adding e-coachER to usual ERS had only a weak indicative effect on long-term rigorously defined, objectively assessed MVPA. The provision of the e-coachER support package led to an additional cost and has a 63% probability of being cost-effective based on the UK threshold of £30,000/QALY. The intervention did improve some process outcomes as specified in our Logic Model.

Study registration: ISRCTN15644451

Funding details: NIHR HTA 13/25/20
ccelerometer, Adult, Behaviour change, Body Mass Index, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, e-health, Exercise, Goal Setting, Humans, Hypertension, Mediation, Obesity, Osteoarthritis, Pedometer, Primary Health Care, Process Evaluation, Qualitative, Quality of Life, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Self-Determination Theory, Self-Monitoring.
1366-5278
1-106
Taylor, Adrian H.
c7d629e0-c052-46d6-88d8-f61f6c4d8e7d
Taylor, Rod
12fb1379-fab8-4713-9c5d-2662b5b6ca14
Ingram, Wendy
852f9de8-07c4-4b3b-b70a-60b81e162561
Anokye, Nana
d5ed427e-eeb1-4fc4-9782-4718b150c895
Dean, Sarah
8d6fdb0d-c1dd-4016-8c10-b85fa1876b00
Jolly, Kate
1f61bd9e-bac6-4b1f-a54d-a3081f747c32
Mutrie, Nanette
9c1f3f0a-434e-4275-a546-63d25201a86e
Lambert, Jeffrey
3a3ee37d-f67f-4bb6-863d-ecba9aa56e63
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Greaves, Colin J.
d294c2c8-fa80-483e-bcd0-6971b52b3afe
King, Jennie
8553cc56-4ec3-4e0b-a980-ae1d38eee81e
McAdam, Chloe
195b1be0-a754-4495-a84a-09fb63ed8d29
Steele, Mary
dd7833c4-c04c-495c-aa9a-b23e01a89762
Price, Lisa
cc1b5107-8437-44c9-8674-40bab8edeee6
Streeter, Adam
7a32ca0e-4b04-4da4-af75-8c246b4fce25
Charles, Nigel
ef9e70ba-1427-4346-a905-64645968d7d4
Terry, Rohini
69a202c3-2deb-4c90-b202-a677ba260057
Webb, Douglas
033bc4ea-e5d6-4c90-bc25-019c6c08828f
Campbell, John
2672114b-c303-4554-832c-412eb83fc056
Hughes, Lucy
a36469f7-7453-447e-b4c2-104a0931b6dc
Ainsworth, Benjamin
b02d78c3-aa8b-462d-a534-31f1bf164f81
Jane, Ben
582365d2-94a8-4f51-be36-9cc083a57534
Jones, Ben
f13f93b5-6481-42a1-b52a-550d0a5126ee
Erwin, Josephine
344834cf-cd51-498f-a5c8-22365b82efd1
Little, Paul
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Woolf, Anthony
da25774b-d5c7-41d1-8156-9a5f679fd2f2
Cavanagh, Chris
92ceac8f-9f3a-4b98-8677-c0cbe3600196
Taylor, Adrian H.
c7d629e0-c052-46d6-88d8-f61f6c4d8e7d
Taylor, Rod
12fb1379-fab8-4713-9c5d-2662b5b6ca14
Ingram, Wendy
852f9de8-07c4-4b3b-b70a-60b81e162561
Anokye, Nana
d5ed427e-eeb1-4fc4-9782-4718b150c895
Dean, Sarah
8d6fdb0d-c1dd-4016-8c10-b85fa1876b00
Jolly, Kate
1f61bd9e-bac6-4b1f-a54d-a3081f747c32
Mutrie, Nanette
9c1f3f0a-434e-4275-a546-63d25201a86e
Lambert, Jeffrey
3a3ee37d-f67f-4bb6-863d-ecba9aa56e63
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Greaves, Colin J.
d294c2c8-fa80-483e-bcd0-6971b52b3afe
King, Jennie
8553cc56-4ec3-4e0b-a980-ae1d38eee81e
McAdam, Chloe
195b1be0-a754-4495-a84a-09fb63ed8d29
Steele, Mary
dd7833c4-c04c-495c-aa9a-b23e01a89762
Price, Lisa
cc1b5107-8437-44c9-8674-40bab8edeee6
Streeter, Adam
7a32ca0e-4b04-4da4-af75-8c246b4fce25
Charles, Nigel
ef9e70ba-1427-4346-a905-64645968d7d4
Terry, Rohini
69a202c3-2deb-4c90-b202-a677ba260057
Webb, Douglas
033bc4ea-e5d6-4c90-bc25-019c6c08828f
Campbell, John
2672114b-c303-4554-832c-412eb83fc056
Hughes, Lucy
a36469f7-7453-447e-b4c2-104a0931b6dc
Ainsworth, Benjamin
b02d78c3-aa8b-462d-a534-31f1bf164f81
Jane, Ben
582365d2-94a8-4f51-be36-9cc083a57534
Jones, Ben
f13f93b5-6481-42a1-b52a-550d0a5126ee
Erwin, Josephine
344834cf-cd51-498f-a5c8-22365b82efd1
Little, Paul
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Woolf, Anthony
da25774b-d5c7-41d1-8156-9a5f679fd2f2
Cavanagh, Chris
92ceac8f-9f3a-4b98-8677-c0cbe3600196

Taylor, Adrian H., Taylor, Rod, Ingram, Wendy, Anokye, Nana, Dean, Sarah, Jolly, Kate, Mutrie, Nanette, Lambert, Jeffrey, Yardley, Lucy, Greaves, Colin J., King, Jennie, McAdam, Chloe, Steele, Mary, Price, Lisa, Streeter, Adam, Charles, Nigel, Terry, Rohini, Webb, Douglas, Campbell, John, Hughes, Lucy, Ainsworth, Benjamin, Jane, Ben, Jones, Ben, Erwin, Josephine, Little, Paul, Woolf, Anthony and Cavanagh, Chris (2020) Adding web-based behavioural support to exercise referral schemes for inactive adults with chronic health conditions: the e-coachER Randomised Controlled Trial. Health Technology Assessment, 24 (63), 1-106. (doi:10.3310/hta24630).

Record type: Article

Abstract

There is modest evidence that exercise referral schemes (ERS) increase physical activity (PA) of inactive individuals with chronic health conditions. There is a need to identify additional ways to improve the effects of ERS on long-term PA.

Objectives: To determine if adding the e-coachER intervention to ERS is more effective and cost-effective in increasing PA after one year, compared to usual ERS.

Design: Pragmatic, multicentre 2 arm randomised trial, with mixed methods process evaluation and health economic analysis. Participants were allocated 1:1 to either ERS plus e-coachER (intervention) or ERS alone (control).

Setting: Patients referred to ERS in Plymouth, Birmingham and Glasgow.

Participants: N = 450, aged 16-74 years, with BMI 30-40, hypertension, pre-diabetes, type 2 diabetes, lower limb osteoarthritis, or a current/recent history of treatment for depression; inactive; contactable via email; and an internet user.

Intervention: e-coachER was designed to augment ERS. Participants received a pedometer and fridge magnet with PA recording sheets, and a User Guide to access the web-based support in the form of 7 Steps to Health. e-coachER aimed to build the use of behavioural skills (e.g. self-monitoring) while strengthening favourable beliefs in importance for doing PA, competence, autonomy in PA choices and relatedness. All participants were referred to a standard ERS programme.

Primary outcome measure: Minutes of moderate and vigorous PA (MVPA) in ≥10 min bouts measured by accelerometer over one week at 12 months, worn ≥16 hours per day for ≥4 days including ≥1 weekend day.

Secondary outcomes: Other accelerometer-derived PA measures, self-reported PA, ERS attendance, EQ-5D-5L and HADS were collected at 4 and 12 months.

Results: Participants had a BMI mean (SD) of 32.6 (4.4), were primarily referred for weight loss, and were mostly confident self-rated IT users. Primary outcome analysis involving those with usable data showed a weak indicative effect in favour of the intervention group (N=108) compared with the control group (N=124); 11.9 weekly minutes MVPA, 95% CI -2.1 to 26.0; p = 0.10. 64% of intervention participants logged on at least once with generally positive feedback on the web-based support. The intervention had no effect on other PA outcomes, ERS attendance (78% v 75% in control and intervention, respectively), EQ-5D-5L or HADS scores, but did enhance a number of process outcomes (i.e. confidence, importance and competence) compared with the control group at 4 months but not at 12 months. At 12 months, compared to control, the intervention group incurred an additional mean cost of £439 (95% CI £-182, £1060) but generated more mean quality adjusted life years (QALYs); (0.026, 95% CI 0.013, 0.040) with an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of additional £16,885 per QALY.

Limitations: A significant proportion (46%) of participants were not included in the primary analysis, due to study withdrawal, and insufficient device wear time and the results must be interpreted with caution. The regression model fit for the primary outcome was poor, because of the considerable proportion of participants (142/243 (58%)) who recorded zero minutes of ≥10 minute bouted MVPA at 12 months.

Future work:
The design and rigorous evaluation of cost-effective and scalable ways to increase ERS uptake and maintenance of MVPA are needed among patients with chronic conditions.

Conclusion: Adding e-coachER to usual ERS had only a weak indicative effect on long-term rigorously defined, objectively assessed MVPA. The provision of the e-coachER support package led to an additional cost and has a 63% probability of being cost-effective based on the UK threshold of £30,000/QALY. The intervention did improve some process outcomes as specified in our Logic Model.

Study registration: ISRCTN15644451

Funding details: NIHR HTA 13/25/20

Text
Adding web-based behavioural support to exercise_Taylor_HTA - Accepted Manuscript
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 27 November 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 November 2020
Keywords: ccelerometer, Adult, Behaviour change, Body Mass Index, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, e-health, Exercise, Goal Setting, Humans, Hypertension, Mediation, Obesity, Osteoarthritis, Pedometer, Primary Health Care, Process Evaluation, Qualitative, Quality of Life, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Self-Determination Theory, Self-Monitoring.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 436747
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/436747
ISSN: 1366-5278
PURE UUID: 6e95c102-1650-45db-ab58-2f0ebd253221
ORCID for Lucy Yardley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3853-883X
ORCID for Mary Steele: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2595-3855
ORCID for Benjamin Ainsworth: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5098-1092
ORCID for Paul Little: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3664-1873

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Jan 2020 17:30
Last modified: 12 Jul 2024 04:07

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Adrian H. Taylor
Author: Rod Taylor
Author: Wendy Ingram
Author: Nana Anokye
Author: Sarah Dean
Author: Kate Jolly
Author: Nanette Mutrie
Author: Jeffrey Lambert
Author: Lucy Yardley ORCID iD
Author: Colin J. Greaves
Author: Jennie King
Author: Chloe McAdam
Author: Mary Steele ORCID iD
Author: Lisa Price
Author: Adam Streeter
Author: Nigel Charles
Author: Rohini Terry
Author: Douglas Webb
Author: John Campbell
Author: Lucy Hughes
Author: Benjamin Ainsworth ORCID iD
Author: Ben Jane
Author: Ben Jones
Author: Josephine Erwin
Author: Paul Little ORCID iD
Author: Anthony Woolf
Author: Chris Cavanagh

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×