The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Appendicitis risk prediction models in children presenting with right iliac fossa pain (RIFT study): a prospective, multicentre validation study

Appendicitis risk prediction models in children presenting with right iliac fossa pain (RIFT study): a prospective, multicentre validation study
Appendicitis risk prediction models in children presenting with right iliac fossa pain (RIFT study): a prospective, multicentre validation study

Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in children. Differentiation of acute appendicitis from conditions that do not require operative management can be challenging in children. This study aimed to identify the optimum risk prediction model to stratify acute appendicitis risk in children. Methods: We did a rapid review to identify acute appendicitis risk prediction models. A prospective, multicentre cohort study was then done to evaluate performance of these models. Children (aged 5–15 years) presenting with acute right iliac fossa pain in the UK and Ireland were included. For each model, score cutoff thresholds were systematically varied to identify the best achievable specificity while maintaining a failure rate (ie, proportion of patients identified as low risk who had acute appendicitis) less than 5%. The normal appendicectomy rate was the proportion of resected appendixes found to be normal on histopathological examination. Findings: 15 risk prediction models were identified that could be assessed. The cohort study enrolled 1827 children from 139 centres, of whom 630 (34·5%) underwent appendicectomy. The normal appendicectomy rate was 15·9% (100 of 630 patients). The Shera score was the best performing model, with an area under the curve of 0·84 (95% CI 0·82–0·86). Applying score cutoffs of 3 points or lower for children aged 5–10 years and girls aged 11–15 years, and 2 points or lower for boys aged 11–15 years, the failure rate was 3·3% (95% CI 2·0–5·2; 18 of 539 patients), specificity was 44·3% (95% CI 41·4–47·2; 521 of 1176), and positive predictive value was 41·4% (38·5–44·4; 463 of 1118). Positive predictive value for the Shera score with a cutoff of 6 points or lower (72·6%, 67·4–77·4) was similar to that of ultrasound scan (75·0%, 65·3–83·1). Interpretation: The Shera score has the potential to identify a large group of children at low risk of acute appendicitis who could be considered for early discharge. Risk scoring does not identify children who should proceed directly to surgery. Medium-risk and high-risk children should undergo routine preoperative ultrasound imaging by operators trained to assess for acute appendicitis, and MRI or low-dose CT if uncertainty remains. Funding: None.

2352-4650
271-280
Hall, Nigel
6919e8af-3890-42c1-98a7-c110791957cf
RIFT Study Group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative
Hall, Nigel
6919e8af-3890-42c1-98a7-c110791957cf

RIFT Study Group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative (2020) Appendicitis risk prediction models in children presenting with right iliac fossa pain (RIFT study): a prospective, multicentre validation study. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 4 (4), 271-280. (doi:10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30006-7).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in children. Differentiation of acute appendicitis from conditions that do not require operative management can be challenging in children. This study aimed to identify the optimum risk prediction model to stratify acute appendicitis risk in children. Methods: We did a rapid review to identify acute appendicitis risk prediction models. A prospective, multicentre cohort study was then done to evaluate performance of these models. Children (aged 5–15 years) presenting with acute right iliac fossa pain in the UK and Ireland were included. For each model, score cutoff thresholds were systematically varied to identify the best achievable specificity while maintaining a failure rate (ie, proportion of patients identified as low risk who had acute appendicitis) less than 5%. The normal appendicectomy rate was the proportion of resected appendixes found to be normal on histopathological examination. Findings: 15 risk prediction models were identified that could be assessed. The cohort study enrolled 1827 children from 139 centres, of whom 630 (34·5%) underwent appendicectomy. The normal appendicectomy rate was 15·9% (100 of 630 patients). The Shera score was the best performing model, with an area under the curve of 0·84 (95% CI 0·82–0·86). Applying score cutoffs of 3 points or lower for children aged 5–10 years and girls aged 11–15 years, and 2 points or lower for boys aged 11–15 years, the failure rate was 3·3% (95% CI 2·0–5·2; 18 of 539 patients), specificity was 44·3% (95% CI 41·4–47·2; 521 of 1176), and positive predictive value was 41·4% (38·5–44·4; 463 of 1118). Positive predictive value for the Shera score with a cutoff of 6 points or lower (72·6%, 67·4–77·4) was similar to that of ultrasound scan (75·0%, 65·3–83·1). Interpretation: The Shera score has the potential to identify a large group of children at low risk of acute appendicitis who could be considered for early discharge. Risk scoring does not identify children who should proceed directly to surgery. Medium-risk and high-risk children should undergo routine preoperative ultrasound imaging by operators trained to assess for acute appendicitis, and MRI or low-dose CT if uncertainty remains. Funding: None.

Text
RIFT - Accepted Manuscript
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2 January 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 February 2020
Published date: April 2020

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 436943
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/436943
ISSN: 2352-4650
PURE UUID: 62246a12-e0d5-4c8d-9926-3fd1c6ad18c0
ORCID for Nigel Hall: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8570-9374

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Jan 2020 17:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:12

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nigel Hall ORCID iD
Corporate Author: RIFT Study Group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×