Perioperative haemodynamic optimisation
Perioperative haemodynamic optimisation
The use of fluid and inotropic therapies to optimise global haemodynamic variables, in particular oxygen delivery, in critically ill patients has been a controversial area of research for more than 25 years. The aim of this review is to describe the current evidence base for this treatment and how concepts of haemodynamic optimisation have evolved in recent years. The inconsistent findings of a large number of small phase II trials continue to stimulate the debate about the value of this treatment approach. However, important recent developments include the use of optimisation only during periods of resuscitation, more cautious doses of fluid and/or inotropic therapy, confirmation that pulmonary artery catheter use does not result in excess mortality and an improved understanding of the mechanistic effects of haemodynamic optimisation. These advances in our understanding have now informed the design of large randomised trials in various patient groups. The true value of haemodynamic optimisation is likely to be confirmed or refuted within the next 5 years.
Inotrope, Perioperative, Cardiac output, Fluid, Goal-directed, Haemodynamic, Optimisation
457-467
Edwards, Mark R.
818201d5-7636-4292-9af8-7dd8bcd1fcb5
Pearse, Rupert M.
50f634bc-77c8-4f69-8650-e2b0a29ceaed
2019
Edwards, Mark R.
818201d5-7636-4292-9af8-7dd8bcd1fcb5
Pearse, Rupert M.
50f634bc-77c8-4f69-8650-e2b0a29ceaed
Edwards, Mark R. and Pearse, Rupert M.
(2019)
Perioperative haemodynamic optimisation.
In,
Pinsky, Michael R., Teboul, Jean-Louis and Vincent, Jean-Louis
(eds.)
Hemodynamic Monitoring.
(Lessons from the ICU)
Cham.
Springer Cham, .
(doi:10.1007/978-3-319-69269-2_36).
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
The use of fluid and inotropic therapies to optimise global haemodynamic variables, in particular oxygen delivery, in critically ill patients has been a controversial area of research for more than 25 years. The aim of this review is to describe the current evidence base for this treatment and how concepts of haemodynamic optimisation have evolved in recent years. The inconsistent findings of a large number of small phase II trials continue to stimulate the debate about the value of this treatment approach. However, important recent developments include the use of optimisation only during periods of resuscitation, more cautious doses of fluid and/or inotropic therapy, confirmation that pulmonary artery catheter use does not result in excess mortality and an improved understanding of the mechanistic effects of haemodynamic optimisation. These advances in our understanding have now informed the design of large randomised trials in various patient groups. The true value of haemodynamic optimisation is likely to be confirmed or refuted within the next 5 years.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 22 February 2019
Published date: 2019
Keywords:
Inotrope, Perioperative, Cardiac output, Fluid, Goal-directed, Haemodynamic, Optimisation
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 436993
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/436993
PURE UUID: ada24f99-94bd-4b3c-8293-ae0e6e39c51f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 Jan 2020 18:35
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 05:59
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Mark R. Edwards
Author:
Rupert M. Pearse
Editor:
Michael R. Pinsky
Editor:
Jean-Louis Teboul
Editor:
Jean-Louis Vincent
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics