The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Endocuff vision vs. standard colonoscopy in the FOBT based UK Bowel cancer screening programme (E-­cap study): a randomized trial

Endocuff vision vs. standard colonoscopy in the FOBT based UK Bowel cancer screening programme (E-­cap study): a randomized trial
Endocuff vision vs. standard colonoscopy in the FOBT based UK Bowel cancer screening programme (E-­cap study): a randomized trial
Background and study aims Up to 25 % colorectal adenomas are missed during colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the endocuff could improve polyp detection in an organized bowel cancer screening program (BCSP). Patients and methods This parallel group, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial included patients with positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) who were attending for BCSP colonoscopy. The primary outcome was the number of polyps per patient. Secondary outcomes included the number of adenomas per patient, adenoma and polyp detection rates, and withdrawal times. Results A total of 534 BCSP patients were randomized to endocuff-assisted or standard colonoscopy. The mean age was 67 years and the male to female ratio was 1.8:1. We detected no significant difference in the number of polyps per patient (standard 1.8, endocuff 1.6; P = 0.44), adenomas per patient (standard 1.4, endocuff 1.3; P = 0.54), polyp detection rate (standard 69.8 %, endocuff 70.3 %; P = 0.93), adenoma detection rate (standard 63.0 %, endocuff 60.9 %; P = 0.85), advanced adenoma detection rate (standard 18.5 %, endocuff 16.9 %; P = 0.81), and cancer detection rate (standard 5.7 %, endocuff 5.3 %; P = 0.85). The mean withdrawal time was significantly shorter among patients in the endocuff group compared with the standard colonoscopy group (16.9 vs. 19.5 minutes; P < 0.005). The endocuff had to be removed in 17/266 patients (6.4 %) because of inability to pass through the sigmoid colon. Conclusions This study did not find improved polyp or adenoma detection with endocuff-assisted colonoscopy in the FOBT-positive BCSP population. A shorter withdrawal time with endocuff may reflect improved views and stability provided by the endocuff.
0013-726X
1043-1050
Bhattacharyya, Rupam
eca7ab48-ad03-47b7-9b32-e8d71031d7b2
Chedgy, Fergus
143cea93-6dbc-474c-ba84-d70b7396993a
Kandiah, Kesavan
65a0a577-cb0b-4b9c-b1b5-d44d4a266285
Fogg, Carole
42057537-d443-462a-8944-c804252c973b
Higgins, Bernie
dac0fccb-8fc9-496e-85fb-f98c55e1ba56
Haysom-Newport, Ben
fc5f7257-5c01-4f10-8f5e-4025c8ac8128
Gadeke, Lisa
c1d969f6-7026-4b55-8e60-94968a3eea73
Thursby-Pelham, Fergus
664ff399-6985-494d-8350-fa87278b642a
Ellis, Richard
bf3e2ce1-2010-4487-81ed-e0c25be4fe17
Goggin, Patrick
af9a1146-2245-45e0-ad64-04dfad3f6332
Longcroft-Wheaton, Gaius
c81264ad-35a8-4601-a001-d7cfb6357863
Bhandari, Pradeep
5d6f89f0-a69d-48d7-b182-95e7f400e1c9
Bhattacharyya, Rupam
eca7ab48-ad03-47b7-9b32-e8d71031d7b2
Chedgy, Fergus
143cea93-6dbc-474c-ba84-d70b7396993a
Kandiah, Kesavan
65a0a577-cb0b-4b9c-b1b5-d44d4a266285
Fogg, Carole
42057537-d443-462a-8944-c804252c973b
Higgins, Bernie
dac0fccb-8fc9-496e-85fb-f98c55e1ba56
Haysom-Newport, Ben
fc5f7257-5c01-4f10-8f5e-4025c8ac8128
Gadeke, Lisa
c1d969f6-7026-4b55-8e60-94968a3eea73
Thursby-Pelham, Fergus
664ff399-6985-494d-8350-fa87278b642a
Ellis, Richard
bf3e2ce1-2010-4487-81ed-e0c25be4fe17
Goggin, Patrick
af9a1146-2245-45e0-ad64-04dfad3f6332
Longcroft-Wheaton, Gaius
c81264ad-35a8-4601-a001-d7cfb6357863
Bhandari, Pradeep
5d6f89f0-a69d-48d7-b182-95e7f400e1c9

Bhattacharyya, Rupam, Chedgy, Fergus, Kandiah, Kesavan, Fogg, Carole, Higgins, Bernie, Haysom-Newport, Ben, Gadeke, Lisa, Thursby-Pelham, Fergus, Ellis, Richard, Goggin, Patrick, Longcroft-Wheaton, Gaius and Bhandari, Pradeep (2017) Endocuff vision vs. standard colonoscopy in the FOBT based UK Bowel cancer screening programme (E-­cap study): a randomized trial. Endoscopy, 49 (11), 1043-1050. (doi:10.1055/s-0043-111718).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background and study aims Up to 25 % colorectal adenomas are missed during colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the endocuff could improve polyp detection in an organized bowel cancer screening program (BCSP). Patients and methods This parallel group, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial included patients with positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) who were attending for BCSP colonoscopy. The primary outcome was the number of polyps per patient. Secondary outcomes included the number of adenomas per patient, adenoma and polyp detection rates, and withdrawal times. Results A total of 534 BCSP patients were randomized to endocuff-assisted or standard colonoscopy. The mean age was 67 years and the male to female ratio was 1.8:1. We detected no significant difference in the number of polyps per patient (standard 1.8, endocuff 1.6; P = 0.44), adenomas per patient (standard 1.4, endocuff 1.3; P = 0.54), polyp detection rate (standard 69.8 %, endocuff 70.3 %; P = 0.93), adenoma detection rate (standard 63.0 %, endocuff 60.9 %; P = 0.85), advanced adenoma detection rate (standard 18.5 %, endocuff 16.9 %; P = 0.81), and cancer detection rate (standard 5.7 %, endocuff 5.3 %; P = 0.85). The mean withdrawal time was significantly shorter among patients in the endocuff group compared with the standard colonoscopy group (16.9 vs. 19.5 minutes; P < 0.005). The endocuff had to be removed in 17/266 patients (6.4 %) because of inability to pass through the sigmoid colon. Conclusions This study did not find improved polyp or adenoma detection with endocuff-assisted colonoscopy in the FOBT-positive BCSP population. A shorter withdrawal time with endocuff may reflect improved views and stability provided by the endocuff.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 1 May 2017
Published date: 1 November 2017
Additional Information: 12 month embargo.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 437084
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/437084
ISSN: 0013-726X
PURE UUID: be787463-6a13-4d31-b639-6aa4497e1e2d
ORCID for Carole Fogg: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3000-6185

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Jan 2020 17:34
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:56

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Rupam Bhattacharyya
Author: Fergus Chedgy
Author: Kesavan Kandiah
Author: Carole Fogg ORCID iD
Author: Bernie Higgins
Author: Ben Haysom-Newport
Author: Lisa Gadeke
Author: Fergus Thursby-Pelham
Author: Richard Ellis
Author: Patrick Goggin
Author: Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton
Author: Pradeep Bhandari

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×