From justification to vindication: Lindahl and asymmetrical recognition
From justification to vindication: Lindahl and asymmetrical recognition
This commentary addresses Lindahl’s discussion of asymmetrical recognition and his critique of legal universalism. I highlight some salient links between Lindahl’s work and that of James Tully and Jacques Rancière, before drawing attention to two different ways in which he appeals to the concept ‘unjustified’ and proposing that his analysis needs to deploy a distinction be- tween justification and vindication as modes of normativity.
391-396
Owen, David
9fc71bca-07d1-44af-9248-1b9545265a58
9 December 2019
Owen, David
9fc71bca-07d1-44af-9248-1b9545265a58
Owen, David
(2019)
From justification to vindication: Lindahl and asymmetrical recognition.
Etica & Politica, 21 (3), .
Abstract
This commentary addresses Lindahl’s discussion of asymmetrical recognition and his critique of legal universalism. I highlight some salient links between Lindahl’s work and that of James Tully and Jacques Rancière, before drawing attention to two different ways in which he appeals to the concept ‘unjustified’ and proposing that his analysis needs to deploy a distinction be- tween justification and vindication as modes of normativity.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 9 December 2019
Published date: 9 December 2019
Additional Information:
https://www.openstarts.units.it/handle/10077/4673 for licence info
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 437173
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/437173
ISSN: 1825-5167
PURE UUID: a47dbca7-9e26-4d9f-9669-bf8b33b2b2ea
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 21 Jan 2020 17:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:42
Export record
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
