Subjunctive medicine: enacting efficacy in general practice
Subjunctive medicine: enacting efficacy in general practice
Modern general practice is complex. Issues such as multimorbidity, polypharmacy and chronic illness management can make applying myriad single condition evidence-based guidelines increasingly difficult. This is compounded because the problems presented in general practice often require both clinical and social solutions. In response to these issues, generalist clinicians are now expected to practise ‘person-centred care’: enabling and empowering patients by combining the technical rationality of medical science with individual values, needs and preferences. To explore this difficult undertaking we conducted an ethnography of a general practice surgery in England, including participant observation, interviews, and focus groups with patients, clinicians, and support staff, from February 2018 to March 2019. Our findings suggest that clinicians in our study faced considerable constraints, broadly conceived as the limits of biomedicine and the structural constraints of general practice. However, they mitigated these by getting into good habits, which we conceive in two categories: using expert judgement and taking patients seriously. We further propose that clinicians did not merely will themselves towards these good habits but developed and adapted them by intuitively adopting a second-order ‘meta’ habit of enaction – treating each consultation as collaboratively co-created anew. This suggests an important feature of the general practice consultation: it is conducted as much in the subjunctive as the indicative mood. Developing this proposition, we propose a more general form of medical practice – subjunctive medicine – extolling the value of the co-created social order of the general practice consultation itself. We suggest that practising subjunctive medicine may help clinicians sustainably and resiliently achieve the aims of person-centred care in modern general practice.
Enactivism, England, Ethnography, General practice, Grounded theory, Person-centred care
1-9
Hardman, Douglas, Iain
bf7ba905-0d04-4d1f-9686-f9a3a3d642db
Geraghty, Adam
2c6549fe-9868-4806-b65a-21881c1930af
Lown, Mark
4742d5f8-bcf3-4e0b-811c-920e7d010c9b
Bishop, Felicity
1f5429c5-325f-4ac4-aae3-6ba85d079928
January 2020
Hardman, Douglas, Iain
bf7ba905-0d04-4d1f-9686-f9a3a3d642db
Geraghty, Adam
2c6549fe-9868-4806-b65a-21881c1930af
Lown, Mark
4742d5f8-bcf3-4e0b-811c-920e7d010c9b
Bishop, Felicity
1f5429c5-325f-4ac4-aae3-6ba85d079928
Hardman, Douglas, Iain, Geraghty, Adam, Lown, Mark and Bishop, Felicity
(2020)
Subjunctive medicine: enacting efficacy in general practice.
Social Science & Medicine, 245, , [112693].
(doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112693).
Abstract
Modern general practice is complex. Issues such as multimorbidity, polypharmacy and chronic illness management can make applying myriad single condition evidence-based guidelines increasingly difficult. This is compounded because the problems presented in general practice often require both clinical and social solutions. In response to these issues, generalist clinicians are now expected to practise ‘person-centred care’: enabling and empowering patients by combining the technical rationality of medical science with individual values, needs and preferences. To explore this difficult undertaking we conducted an ethnography of a general practice surgery in England, including participant observation, interviews, and focus groups with patients, clinicians, and support staff, from February 2018 to March 2019. Our findings suggest that clinicians in our study faced considerable constraints, broadly conceived as the limits of biomedicine and the structural constraints of general practice. However, they mitigated these by getting into good habits, which we conceive in two categories: using expert judgement and taking patients seriously. We further propose that clinicians did not merely will themselves towards these good habits but developed and adapted them by intuitively adopting a second-order ‘meta’ habit of enaction – treating each consultation as collaboratively co-created anew. This suggests an important feature of the general practice consultation: it is conducted as much in the subjunctive as the indicative mood. Developing this proposition, we propose a more general form of medical practice – subjunctive medicine – extolling the value of the co-created social order of the general practice consultation itself. We suggest that practising subjunctive medicine may help clinicians sustainably and resiliently achieve the aims of person-centred care in modern general practice.
Text
Subjunctive medicine_Accepted Manuscript (1)
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 18 November 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 21 November 2019
Published date: January 2020
Keywords:
Enactivism, England, Ethnography, General practice, Grounded theory, Person-centred care
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 437418
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/437418
ISSN: 0277-9536
PURE UUID: fdb86ca5-8d2d-46b9-b34c-0e06a55fce2d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 29 Jan 2020 17:36
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:16
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Douglas, Iain Hardman
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics