The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Why, How and When Do Employees Initiate Constructive Voice? An Exploration of Influence from Leaders and Organizations

Why, How and When Do Employees Initiate Constructive Voice? An Exploration of Influence from Leaders and Organizations
Why, How and When Do Employees Initiate Constructive Voice? An Exploration of Influence from Leaders and Organizations
It has been shown that employee constructive voice (e.g., making constructive suggestions) has significant positive effects on team and organisational effectiveness; however, many employees are unwilling to speak up or voice their opinions. Understanding how to encourage employees to speak up has become increasingly important for today's organisations, especially from the perspectives of leaders and organisations. This thesis, which consists of two empirical studies, elaborates how, why and when employees express their voices, from the perspectives of two social actors: leaders (i.e., servant leaders) and organisations (i.e., psychological contract breach; PCB). Specifically, Study 1 examines whether engaging in servant leader behaviour affects leader and follower energy resources based on conservation of resource (COR) theory, and if so, whether such effects lead to greater follower constructive voice. It investigates a dual-centric energising process in which leaders' relational energy and followers' feelings of energy mediate the relationship between servant leadership and follower constructive voice; these relationships are strengthened when leaders have greater self-regulation. Study 2 investigates how PCB hampers employee constructive voice but leads to destructive voice. It develops and tests a moderated-mediation model in which relative deprivation is theorised as a unique mechanism contributing to why employees who perceive PCB are less likely to speak constructively but more likely to speak destructively; leader emotional support acts as a buffer in relationships between PCB and voice. A series of time-lagged supervisor-subordinate matched data was used to test the overall framework. Results confirm that followers' feelings of energy and leaders' relational energy mediated the relationship between servant leadership and follower voice, and leader self-regulation strengthened the positive relationships between servant leadership and both followers' feelings of energy and leaders' relational energy, as well as indirect relationships between servant leadership and follower voice. Finally, results support that argument that relative deprivation mediates relationships between PCB and employee destructive and constructive voice, as well as the buffering effect of leader emotional support. This thesis contributes to the voice literature, servant leadership and PCB literature by investigating new underlying psychological mechanisms of constructive voice, and building and testing boundary conditions of constructive voice. Theoretical and practical implications for practitioners are discussed.
Australian National University
Lin, Xiaoshuang
d0bbdbac-4a58-459a-9d2d-6c235788095a
Lin, Xiaoshuang
d0bbdbac-4a58-459a-9d2d-6c235788095a
Chen, Zhen Xiong
4c9a552d-80d6-4c65-b329-5025298d5993

Lin, Xiaoshuang (2019) Why, How and When Do Employees Initiate Constructive Voice? An Exploration of Influence from Leaders and Organizations. Australian National University, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

It has been shown that employee constructive voice (e.g., making constructive suggestions) has significant positive effects on team and organisational effectiveness; however, many employees are unwilling to speak up or voice their opinions. Understanding how to encourage employees to speak up has become increasingly important for today's organisations, especially from the perspectives of leaders and organisations. This thesis, which consists of two empirical studies, elaborates how, why and when employees express their voices, from the perspectives of two social actors: leaders (i.e., servant leaders) and organisations (i.e., psychological contract breach; PCB). Specifically, Study 1 examines whether engaging in servant leader behaviour affects leader and follower energy resources based on conservation of resource (COR) theory, and if so, whether such effects lead to greater follower constructive voice. It investigates a dual-centric energising process in which leaders' relational energy and followers' feelings of energy mediate the relationship between servant leadership and follower constructive voice; these relationships are strengthened when leaders have greater self-regulation. Study 2 investigates how PCB hampers employee constructive voice but leads to destructive voice. It develops and tests a moderated-mediation model in which relative deprivation is theorised as a unique mechanism contributing to why employees who perceive PCB are less likely to speak constructively but more likely to speak destructively; leader emotional support acts as a buffer in relationships between PCB and voice. A series of time-lagged supervisor-subordinate matched data was used to test the overall framework. Results confirm that followers' feelings of energy and leaders' relational energy mediated the relationship between servant leadership and follower voice, and leader self-regulation strengthened the positive relationships between servant leadership and both followers' feelings of energy and leaders' relational energy, as well as indirect relationships between servant leadership and follower voice. Finally, results support that argument that relative deprivation mediates relationships between PCB and employee destructive and constructive voice, as well as the buffering effect of leader emotional support. This thesis contributes to the voice literature, servant leadership and PCB literature by investigating new underlying psychological mechanisms of constructive voice, and building and testing boundary conditions of constructive voice. Theoretical and practical implications for practitioners are discussed.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 437697
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/437697
PURE UUID: fd0c3723-0655-4ec0-9b31-64f3783c495d

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Feb 2020 17:31
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 05:54

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Xiaoshuang Lin
Thesis advisor: Zhen Xiong Chen

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×