The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

PP147 Olaratumab with Doxorubicin for advanced soft tissue sarcoma

PP147 Olaratumab with Doxorubicin for advanced soft tissue sarcoma
PP147 Olaratumab with Doxorubicin for advanced soft tissue sarcoma
Introduction: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited the manufacturer of olaratumab (Lartruvo®), Eli Lilly & Company Limited, to submit evidence for the clinical and cost effectiveness of this drug, in combination with doxorubicin, for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) not amenable to surgery or radiotherapy, as part of the Institute's Single Technology Appraisal. The Peninsula Technology Assessment Group critically reviewed the submitted evidence. Methods: Clinical effectiveness was derived from an open-label, randomized controlled trial, JGDG. The economic analysis was based on a partitioned survival model with a time horizon of 25 years. The perspective was of the UK National Health Service (NHS) and Personal Social Services. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5 percent per year. The company's evidence was submitted in anticipation that olaratumab would be considered as an alternative to doxorubicin, which has been used as a first-line treatment for advanced STS. To improve the cost effectiveness of olaratumab, the company offered a discount through a Commercial Access Agreement with the NHS England. Results: In the company's submission, the mean base-case and probabilistic incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for olaratumab plus doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone were GBP 46,076 (USD 61,403) and GBP 47,127 (USD 62,804) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, respectively; the probability of this treatment being cost effective at the willingness-to-pay threshold of GBP 50,000 (USD 66,632) per QALY gained, applicable to end-of-life treatments, was 0.54. The respective estimates in our analysis were approximately GBP 60,000 (USD 79,959) per QALY gained, and the probability of cost-effectiveness was 0.21. The increase in the ICERs was primarily due to differences in extrapolation of overall survival, and drug administration costs. Conclusions: Based on the available evidence, olaratumab in combination with doxorubicin improves the survival of patients with advanced STS. However, this treatment is unlikely to be cost-effective. Olaratumab is now recommended for use within the Cancer Drugs Fund.
0266-4623
123-124
Tikhonova, Irina
577ccbcc-6643-4190-bb6d-19e13b44bcd1
Jones-Hughes, Tracey
6350a7df-c6eb-4729-9156-f67c4992886c
Dunham, James
bfbcbb61-3d53-4a22-80b4-ce336c84c386
Warren, Fiona
02e37602-f259-457f-8876-b0ecafaae757
Robinson, Sophie
ca6f6393-f165-4a34-98a5-d90541c7b851
Hoyle, Martin
c45bff8b-b34d-4622-a09a-61d4af518969
Tikhonova, Irina
577ccbcc-6643-4190-bb6d-19e13b44bcd1
Jones-Hughes, Tracey
6350a7df-c6eb-4729-9156-f67c4992886c
Dunham, James
bfbcbb61-3d53-4a22-80b4-ce336c84c386
Warren, Fiona
02e37602-f259-457f-8876-b0ecafaae757
Robinson, Sophie
ca6f6393-f165-4a34-98a5-d90541c7b851
Hoyle, Martin
c45bff8b-b34d-4622-a09a-61d4af518969

Tikhonova, Irina, Jones-Hughes, Tracey, Dunham, James, Warren, Fiona, Robinson, Sophie and Hoyle, Martin (2018) PP147 Olaratumab with Doxorubicin for advanced soft tissue sarcoma. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 34 (S1), 123-124, [PP147]. (doi:10.1017/S0266462318002775).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

Introduction: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited the manufacturer of olaratumab (Lartruvo®), Eli Lilly & Company Limited, to submit evidence for the clinical and cost effectiveness of this drug, in combination with doxorubicin, for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) not amenable to surgery or radiotherapy, as part of the Institute's Single Technology Appraisal. The Peninsula Technology Assessment Group critically reviewed the submitted evidence. Methods: Clinical effectiveness was derived from an open-label, randomized controlled trial, JGDG. The economic analysis was based on a partitioned survival model with a time horizon of 25 years. The perspective was of the UK National Health Service (NHS) and Personal Social Services. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5 percent per year. The company's evidence was submitted in anticipation that olaratumab would be considered as an alternative to doxorubicin, which has been used as a first-line treatment for advanced STS. To improve the cost effectiveness of olaratumab, the company offered a discount through a Commercial Access Agreement with the NHS England. Results: In the company's submission, the mean base-case and probabilistic incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for olaratumab plus doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone were GBP 46,076 (USD 61,403) and GBP 47,127 (USD 62,804) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, respectively; the probability of this treatment being cost effective at the willingness-to-pay threshold of GBP 50,000 (USD 66,632) per QALY gained, applicable to end-of-life treatments, was 0.54. The respective estimates in our analysis were approximately GBP 60,000 (USD 79,959) per QALY gained, and the probability of cost-effectiveness was 0.21. The increase in the ICERs was primarily due to differences in extrapolation of overall survival, and drug administration costs. Conclusions: Based on the available evidence, olaratumab in combination with doxorubicin improves the survival of patients with advanced STS. However, this treatment is unlikely to be cost-effective. Olaratumab is now recommended for use within the Cancer Drugs Fund.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2018
Additional Information: Special Issue, Conference Theme: Strengthening the Evidence-to-Action Connection

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 437830
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/437830
ISSN: 0266-4623
PURE UUID: 334de4c2-c422-4071-9626-2493191a65ff
ORCID for Irina Tikhonova: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2723-0802

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Feb 2020 17:32
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 06:42

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Irina Tikhonova ORCID iD
Author: Tracey Jones-Hughes
Author: James Dunham
Author: Fiona Warren
Author: Sophie Robinson
Author: Martin Hoyle

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×