The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparison of balance changes after inspiratory muscle or Otago exercise training

Comparison of balance changes after inspiratory muscle or Otago exercise training
Comparison of balance changes after inspiratory muscle or Otago exercise training
The inspiratory muscles contribute to balance via diaphragmatic contraction and by increasing intra-abdominal pressure. We have shown inspiratory muscle training (IMT) improves dynamic balance significantly with healthy community-dwellers. However, it is not known how the magnitude of balance improvements following IMT compares to that of an established balance program. This study compared the effects of 8-week of IMT for community-dwellers, to 8-week of the Otago exercise program (OEP) for care-residents, on balance and physical performance outcomes. Nineteen healthy community-dwellers (74 ± 4 years) were assigned to self-administered IMT. Eighteen, healthy care-residents (82 ± 4 years) were assigned to instructor-led OEP. The IMT involved 30 breaths twice-daily at ~50% of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP). The OEP group undertook resistance and mobility exercises for ~60 minutes, twice-weekly. Balance and physical performance were assessed using the mini Balance Evaluation System Test (mini-BEST) and time up and go (TUG). After 8-week, both groups improved balance ability significantly (mini-BEST: IMT by 24 ± 34%; OEP by 34 ± 28%), with no between-group difference. Dynamic balance sub-tasks improved significantly more for the IMT group (P < 0.01), than the OEP group and vice versa for static balance sub-tasks (P = 0.01). The IMT group also improved MIP (by 66 ± 97%), peak inspiratory power (by 31 ± 12%) and TUG (by -11 ± 27%); whereas the OEP did not. IMT and OEP improved balance ability similarly, with IMT eliciting greater improvement in dynamic balance, whilst OEP improved static balance more than IMT. Unlike IMT, the OEP did not provide additional benefits in inspiratory muscle function and TUG performance. Our findings suggest that IMT offers a novel method of improving dynamic balance in older adults, which may be more relevant to function than static balance and potentially a useful adjunct to the OEP in frailty prevention.
1932-6203
Ferraro, Francesco Vincenzo
efb11893-c180-4588-b28e-a37bb4e7eca8
Gavin, James Peter
e0d9b404-3f63-4855-8e64-bf1692e6cc3f
Wainwright, Thomas William
b3ed7db0-1679-4068-8241-744328946468
Mcconnell, Alison K.
2be65a3b-b800-4f04-be3f-5ac49ca4fa28
Ferraro, Francesco Vincenzo
efb11893-c180-4588-b28e-a37bb4e7eca8
Gavin, James Peter
e0d9b404-3f63-4855-8e64-bf1692e6cc3f
Wainwright, Thomas William
b3ed7db0-1679-4068-8241-744328946468
Mcconnell, Alison K.
2be65a3b-b800-4f04-be3f-5ac49ca4fa28

Ferraro, Francesco Vincenzo, Gavin, James Peter, Wainwright, Thomas William and Mcconnell, Alison K. (2020) Comparison of balance changes after inspiratory muscle or Otago exercise training. PLoS ONE, 15 (1), [e0227379]. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227379).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The inspiratory muscles contribute to balance via diaphragmatic contraction and by increasing intra-abdominal pressure. We have shown inspiratory muscle training (IMT) improves dynamic balance significantly with healthy community-dwellers. However, it is not known how the magnitude of balance improvements following IMT compares to that of an established balance program. This study compared the effects of 8-week of IMT for community-dwellers, to 8-week of the Otago exercise program (OEP) for care-residents, on balance and physical performance outcomes. Nineteen healthy community-dwellers (74 ± 4 years) were assigned to self-administered IMT. Eighteen, healthy care-residents (82 ± 4 years) were assigned to instructor-led OEP. The IMT involved 30 breaths twice-daily at ~50% of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP). The OEP group undertook resistance and mobility exercises for ~60 minutes, twice-weekly. Balance and physical performance were assessed using the mini Balance Evaluation System Test (mini-BEST) and time up and go (TUG). After 8-week, both groups improved balance ability significantly (mini-BEST: IMT by 24 ± 34%; OEP by 34 ± 28%), with no between-group difference. Dynamic balance sub-tasks improved significantly more for the IMT group (P < 0.01), than the OEP group and vice versa for static balance sub-tasks (P = 0.01). The IMT group also improved MIP (by 66 ± 97%), peak inspiratory power (by 31 ± 12%) and TUG (by -11 ± 27%); whereas the OEP did not. IMT and OEP improved balance ability similarly, with IMT eliciting greater improvement in dynamic balance, whilst OEP improved static balance more than IMT. Unlike IMT, the OEP did not provide additional benefits in inspiratory muscle function and TUG performance. Our findings suggest that IMT offers a novel method of improving dynamic balance in older adults, which may be more relevant to function than static balance and potentially a useful adjunct to the OEP in frailty prevention.

Text
journal.pone.0227379 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 17 January 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 24 January 2020
Published date: 24 January 2020
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Ferraro et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 438048
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/438048
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: 1e7a215f-15fb-46ac-a767-a030c7825f5b
ORCID for James Peter Gavin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0574-0502

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Feb 2020 17:31
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 02:05

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Francesco Vincenzo Ferraro
Author: Thomas William Wainwright
Author: Alison K. Mcconnell

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×