The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Ready-made oral nutritional supplements improve nutritional outcomes and reduce health care use—A randomised trial in older malnourished people in primary care

Ready-made oral nutritional supplements improve nutritional outcomes and reduce health care use—A randomised trial in older malnourished people in primary care
Ready-made oral nutritional supplements improve nutritional outcomes and reduce health care use—A randomised trial in older malnourished people in primary care

Large trials assessing oral nutritional supplements (ONS) and dietary advice (DA) in primary care are lacking. This study examined effects of ONS + DA versus DA on intake, weight, QoL, healthcare use and satisfaction in malnourished free‐living older people. Three hundred and eight people (71.5 ± 10.7y) were randomised to receive ONS + DA (n154) or DA (n154) for 12 weeks. At baseline, 4, 8, 12 weeks, intake, weight, QoL, healthcare use and satisfaction were measured. ONS + DA group (mean daily intake ONS 480 kcal; 21 g protein; 80% compliance) had significantly greater total energy and protein intakes (+401 kcal/d, p < 0.001; +15 g/d, p < 0.001) and weight gain (+0.8 kg; p < 0.001) compared to DA. QoL improved in both groups over time with a significant improvement in index with ONS + DA (p = 0.009). Significantly more participants found ONS + DA made a difference for them (p = 0.011), but no differences were found between groups using Euroqol. Compared to DA, healthcare use reduced with ONS + DA, (HCP visits by 34%, emergency admissions 50%, LOS 62%). Acceptability of both interventions was high (ONS 96%, DA 95%), with significantly more participants satisfied with ONS (89%) than DA (73%) (p = 0.009). This trial in primary care indicates that ONS are acceptable, make a difference to patients, significantly improve intake and weight, and reduce health care use with potential savings.

Dietary advice, Free living elderly, Health care use, Malnutrition, Oral nutritional supplement
2072-6643
Smith, Trevor R.
53e6838c-2e95-4c8f-9325-53163ab6255d
Cawood, Abbie L.
4067d429-6ce8-4e50-b5f5-d8bf62aada79
Walters, Emily R.
129e9486-7b19-4ced-943f-dc144f873fd9
Guildford, Natasha
7eb16a5a-aea2-4d03-ba1d-9d85169d6680
Stratton, Rebecca J.
bf841e43-a4e2-44f0-9f25-bf67564a8d74
Smith, Trevor R.
53e6838c-2e95-4c8f-9325-53163ab6255d
Cawood, Abbie L.
4067d429-6ce8-4e50-b5f5-d8bf62aada79
Walters, Emily R.
129e9486-7b19-4ced-943f-dc144f873fd9
Guildford, Natasha
7eb16a5a-aea2-4d03-ba1d-9d85169d6680
Stratton, Rebecca J.
bf841e43-a4e2-44f0-9f25-bf67564a8d74

Smith, Trevor R., Cawood, Abbie L., Walters, Emily R., Guildford, Natasha and Stratton, Rebecca J. (2020) Ready-made oral nutritional supplements improve nutritional outcomes and reduce health care use—A randomised trial in older malnourished people in primary care. Nutrients, 12 (2), [517]. (doi:10.3390/nu12020517).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Large trials assessing oral nutritional supplements (ONS) and dietary advice (DA) in primary care are lacking. This study examined effects of ONS + DA versus DA on intake, weight, QoL, healthcare use and satisfaction in malnourished free‐living older people. Three hundred and eight people (71.5 ± 10.7y) were randomised to receive ONS + DA (n154) or DA (n154) for 12 weeks. At baseline, 4, 8, 12 weeks, intake, weight, QoL, healthcare use and satisfaction were measured. ONS + DA group (mean daily intake ONS 480 kcal; 21 g protein; 80% compliance) had significantly greater total energy and protein intakes (+401 kcal/d, p < 0.001; +15 g/d, p < 0.001) and weight gain (+0.8 kg; p < 0.001) compared to DA. QoL improved in both groups over time with a significant improvement in index with ONS + DA (p = 0.009). Significantly more participants found ONS + DA made a difference for them (p = 0.011), but no differences were found between groups using Euroqol. Compared to DA, healthcare use reduced with ONS + DA, (HCP visits by 34%, emergency admissions 50%, LOS 62%). Acceptability of both interventions was high (ONS 96%, DA 95%), with significantly more participants satisfied with ONS (89%) than DA (73%) (p = 0.009). This trial in primary care indicates that ONS are acceptable, make a difference to patients, significantly improve intake and weight, and reduce health care use with potential savings.

Text
nutrients-12-00517 (1) - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (534kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 14 February 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 February 2020
Published date: 18 February 2020
Additional Information: Funding Information: Ethical approval from the Southampton Central Southampton Research Ethics Committee A was granted in September 2012 and the trial was conducted in accordance with their ethical standards and the Declaration of Helsinki. The trial was registered with ISRCTN database on 3rd October 2012; registration number ISRCTN26004104. The trial was sponsored by University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation trust and was adopted by the National Institute of Health Funding Information: Funding: This work was supported by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR), providing funding for service support costs for GP practices; and an unrestricted educational grant from Nutricia Advanced Medical Nutrition, Global Organisation, The Netherlands, who had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article. Nutricia provided the nutritional supplements free of charge. Funding Information: Conflicts of Interest: T.R.S. on behalf of the trial sponsor University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust received funding from NIHR and an unrestricted educational grant from Nutricia to support the study. E.R.W. is a voluntary member of the Department of Health Advisory Board for Borderline Substances. A.L.C. and R.J.S. both of whom hold honorary research posts with the University of Southampton, are also employed part time by Nutricia. N.G. declared no conflicts of interest. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Keywords: Dietary advice, Free living elderly, Health care use, Malnutrition, Oral nutritional supplement

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 438174
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/438174
ISSN: 2072-6643
PURE UUID: 9b8ed010-2aa0-4151-845e-9006376223ea
ORCID for Emily R. Walters: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7935-0086

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Mar 2020 17:45
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 06:57

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Trevor R. Smith
Author: Abbie L. Cawood
Author: Emily R. Walters ORCID iD
Author: Natasha Guildford
Author: Rebecca J. Stratton

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×