The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Economic analysis of first-line treatment with Cetuximab or Panitumumab for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer in England

Economic analysis of first-line treatment with Cetuximab or Panitumumab for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer in England
Economic analysis of first-line treatment with Cetuximab or Panitumumab for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer in England
Background

Combination therapies with cetuximab (Erbitux®; Merck Serono UK Ltd) and panitumumab (Vectibix®; Amgen UK Ltd) are shown to be less effective in adults with metastatic colorectal cancer who have mutations in exons 2, 3 and 4 of KRAS and NRAS oncogenes from the rat sarcoma (RAS) family.

Objective

The objective of the study was to estimate the cost effectiveness of these drugs in patients with previously untreated RAS wild-type (i.e. non-mutated) metastatic colorectal cancer, not eligible for liver resection at baseline, from the UK National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective.

Methods

We constructed a partitioned survival model to evaluate the long-term costs and benefits of cetuximab and panitumumab combined with either FOLFOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin) or FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan) vs. FOLFOX or FOLFIRI alone. The economic analysis was based on three randomised controlled trials. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years were discounted at 3.5% per annum.

Results

Based on the evidence available, both drugs fulfil the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence’s end-of-life criteria. In the analysis, assuming discount prices for the drugs from patient access schemes agreed by the drug manufacturers with the Department of Health, predicted mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for cetuximab + FOLFOX, panitumumab + FOLFOX and cetuximab + FOLFIRI compared with chemotherapy alone appeared cost-effective at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence’s threshold of £50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, applicable to end-of-life treatments.

Conclusion

Cetuximab and panitumumab were recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for patients with previously untreated RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, not eligible for liver resection at baseline, for use within the National Health Service in England. Both treatments are available via the UK Cancer Drugs Fund.

1170-7690
837-851
Tikhonova, Irina A.
577ccbcc-6643-4190-bb6d-19e13b44bcd1
Huxley, Nicola
703c4699-0f49-418c-8af6-0acb8700e465
Snowsill, Tristan
33dbf192-8a97-43ed-9317-538d41cf498f
Crathorne, Louise
f12cef06-0f01-4a1f-8dde-cbfbfbdaa557
Varley-Campbell, Jo
0952839e-b1f4-4e45-b538-6dfc7936f259
Napier, Mark
1548cfad-2dba-4eba-901b-147d27a23a7c
Hoyle, Martin
c45bff8b-b34d-4622-a09a-61d4af518969
Tikhonova, Irina A.
577ccbcc-6643-4190-bb6d-19e13b44bcd1
Huxley, Nicola
703c4699-0f49-418c-8af6-0acb8700e465
Snowsill, Tristan
33dbf192-8a97-43ed-9317-538d41cf498f
Crathorne, Louise
f12cef06-0f01-4a1f-8dde-cbfbfbdaa557
Varley-Campbell, Jo
0952839e-b1f4-4e45-b538-6dfc7936f259
Napier, Mark
1548cfad-2dba-4eba-901b-147d27a23a7c
Hoyle, Martin
c45bff8b-b34d-4622-a09a-61d4af518969

Tikhonova, Irina A., Huxley, Nicola, Snowsill, Tristan, Crathorne, Louise, Varley-Campbell, Jo, Napier, Mark and Hoyle, Martin (2018) Economic analysis of first-line treatment with Cetuximab or Panitumumab for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer in England. PharmacoEconomics, 36 (7), 837-851. (doi:10.1007/s40273-018-0630-9).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background

Combination therapies with cetuximab (Erbitux®; Merck Serono UK Ltd) and panitumumab (Vectibix®; Amgen UK Ltd) are shown to be less effective in adults with metastatic colorectal cancer who have mutations in exons 2, 3 and 4 of KRAS and NRAS oncogenes from the rat sarcoma (RAS) family.

Objective

The objective of the study was to estimate the cost effectiveness of these drugs in patients with previously untreated RAS wild-type (i.e. non-mutated) metastatic colorectal cancer, not eligible for liver resection at baseline, from the UK National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective.

Methods

We constructed a partitioned survival model to evaluate the long-term costs and benefits of cetuximab and panitumumab combined with either FOLFOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin) or FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan) vs. FOLFOX or FOLFIRI alone. The economic analysis was based on three randomised controlled trials. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years were discounted at 3.5% per annum.

Results

Based on the evidence available, both drugs fulfil the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence’s end-of-life criteria. In the analysis, assuming discount prices for the drugs from patient access schemes agreed by the drug manufacturers with the Department of Health, predicted mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for cetuximab + FOLFOX, panitumumab + FOLFOX and cetuximab + FOLFIRI compared with chemotherapy alone appeared cost-effective at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence’s threshold of £50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, applicable to end-of-life treatments.

Conclusion

Cetuximab and panitumumab were recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for patients with previously untreated RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, not eligible for liver resection at baseline, for use within the National Health Service in England. Both treatments are available via the UK Cancer Drugs Fund.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 1 March 2018
Published date: July 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 438186
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/438186
ISSN: 1170-7690
PURE UUID: 807c6c08-dbd7-4a21-b1f3-8dbffa767de3
ORCID for Irina A. Tikhonova: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2723-0802

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Mar 2020 17:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 12:37

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Irina A. Tikhonova ORCID iD
Author: Nicola Huxley
Author: Tristan Snowsill
Author: Louise Crathorne
Author: Jo Varley-Campbell
Author: Mark Napier
Author: Martin Hoyle

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×