Quantifying soft tissue artefacts and imaging variability in motion capture of the fingers
Quantifying soft tissue artefacts and imaging variability in motion capture of the fingers
This study assessed the accuracy of marker-based kinematic analysis of the fingers, considering soft tissue artefacts (STA) and marker imaging uncertainty. We collected CT images of the hand from healthy volunteers with fingers in full extension, mid- and full-flexion, including motion capture markers. Bones and markers were segmented and meshed. The bone meshes for each volunteer’s scans were aligned using the proximal phalanx to study the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP), and using the middle phalanx to study the distal interphalangeal joint (DIP). The angle changes between positions were extracted. The HAWK protocol was used to calculate PIP and DIP joint flexion angles in each position based on the marker centroids. Finally the marker locations were ‘corrected’ relative to the underlying bones, and the flexion angles recalculated. Static and dynamic marker imaging uncertainty was evaluated using a wand. A strong positive correlation was observed between marker- and CT-based joint angle changes with 0.980 and 0.892 regression slopes for PIP and DIP, respectively, and Root Mean Squared Errors below 4°. Notably for the PIP joint, correlation was worsened by STA correction. The 95% imaging uncertainty interval was < ± 1° for joints, and < ± 0.25 mm for segment lengths. In summary, the HAWK marker set’s accuracy was characterised for finger joint flexion angle changes in a small group of healthy individuals and static poses, and was found to benefit from skin movements during flexion.
Biomechanical modelling, CT, Hand, Kinematic, MoCap, Musculoskeletal, STA, Skin movement artefact
1551-1561
Metcalf, C.D.
09a47264-8bd5-43bd-a93e-177992c22c72
Phillips, C.
64d39da7-ce38-4265-9c8e-6c20c9ce4bba
Forrester, A.
176bf191-3fc2-46b4-80e0-9d9a0cd7a572
Glodowski, J.
778bef04-8391-452d-9dbc-5d104c02f074
Simpson, K.
d5cfb9cb-c945-4ebb-b6a2-99139abf3750
Everitt, C.
62cd944b-84a2-441e-bab7-1e85e9156bcf
Darekar, A.
314a85df-6c85-43e1-8312-9b7616a54cc7
King, L.
7442bd3c-ed4c-46aa-9d9b-1898a113c740
Warwick, D.
f6d42a53-1af3-44f9-9741-5268e95c2b7e
Dickinson, A.S.
10151972-c1b5-4f7d-bc12-6482b5870cad
1 May 2020
Metcalf, C.D.
09a47264-8bd5-43bd-a93e-177992c22c72
Phillips, C.
64d39da7-ce38-4265-9c8e-6c20c9ce4bba
Forrester, A.
176bf191-3fc2-46b4-80e0-9d9a0cd7a572
Glodowski, J.
778bef04-8391-452d-9dbc-5d104c02f074
Simpson, K.
d5cfb9cb-c945-4ebb-b6a2-99139abf3750
Everitt, C.
62cd944b-84a2-441e-bab7-1e85e9156bcf
Darekar, A.
314a85df-6c85-43e1-8312-9b7616a54cc7
King, L.
7442bd3c-ed4c-46aa-9d9b-1898a113c740
Warwick, D.
f6d42a53-1af3-44f9-9741-5268e95c2b7e
Dickinson, A.S.
10151972-c1b5-4f7d-bc12-6482b5870cad
Metcalf, C.D., Phillips, C., Forrester, A., Glodowski, J., Simpson, K., Everitt, C., Darekar, A., King, L., Warwick, D. and Dickinson, A.S.
(2020)
Quantifying soft tissue artefacts and imaging variability in motion capture of the fingers.
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 48 (5), .
(doi:10.1007/s10439-020-02476-2).
Abstract
This study assessed the accuracy of marker-based kinematic analysis of the fingers, considering soft tissue artefacts (STA) and marker imaging uncertainty. We collected CT images of the hand from healthy volunteers with fingers in full extension, mid- and full-flexion, including motion capture markers. Bones and markers were segmented and meshed. The bone meshes for each volunteer’s scans were aligned using the proximal phalanx to study the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP), and using the middle phalanx to study the distal interphalangeal joint (DIP). The angle changes between positions were extracted. The HAWK protocol was used to calculate PIP and DIP joint flexion angles in each position based on the marker centroids. Finally the marker locations were ‘corrected’ relative to the underlying bones, and the flexion angles recalculated. Static and dynamic marker imaging uncertainty was evaluated using a wand. A strong positive correlation was observed between marker- and CT-based joint angle changes with 0.980 and 0.892 regression slopes for PIP and DIP, respectively, and Root Mean Squared Errors below 4°. Notably for the PIP joint, correlation was worsened by STA correction. The 95% imaging uncertainty interval was < ± 1° for joints, and < ± 0.25 mm for segment lengths. In summary, the HAWK marker set’s accuracy was characterised for finger joint flexion angle changes in a small group of healthy individuals and static poses, and was found to benefit from skin movements during flexion.
Text
Metcalf 2020 Article Quantifying Soft Tissue Artefacts
- Version of Record
More information
Submitted date: 30 October 2019
Accepted/In Press date: 5 February 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 19 February 2020
Published date: 1 May 2020
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
This study was approved by institutional and national ethics boards (UK National Research Ethics Service (NRES) reference 14/LO/1059, clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03094962). The study was funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) University of Southampton Doctoral Training Partnership (grant refs EP/L505067/1 (CWP), and EP/N509747/1 (JG)) and the Royal Academy of Engineering (grant ref RF/130 (ASD)). The sponsors had no involvement in the conduct or reporting of the study. The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the Southampton Musculoskeletal Research Unit and the Institute for Life Sciences ‘FortisNet’ networks, and the study participants. Supporting data are openly available from the University of Southampton repository at http://dx.doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/D1237 .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
Keywords:
Biomechanical modelling, CT, Hand, Kinematic, MoCap, Musculoskeletal, STA, Skin movement artefact
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 438210
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/438210
ISSN: 0090-6964
PURE UUID: 404b8041-e2f6-450d-911a-275ed09c742a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Mar 2020 17:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:09
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
J. Glodowski
Author:
K. Simpson
Author:
C. Everitt
Author:
A. Darekar
Author:
L. King
Author:
D. Warwick
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics