Baseline risk, timing of invasive strategy and guideline compliance in NSTEMI: Nationwide analysis from MINAP
Baseline risk, timing of invasive strategy and guideline compliance in NSTEMI: Nationwide analysis from MINAP
Background: International guidelines recommend that for NSTEMI, the timing of invasive strategy (IS) is a function of patient's baseline risk. The extent to which this is delivered across and within healthcare systems is unknown. Methods: Data were derived from 137,265 patients admitted with an NSTEMI diagnosis between 2010 and 2015 in England and Wales. Patients were stratified into low, intermediate and high-risk in keeping with international guidelines. Time to IS was categorised into early (24 h), intermediate (25–72 h) and late (>72 h). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors of guidelines recommended receipt of IS. Results: There were 3608 (2.6%) low, 5037 (3.7%) intermediate and 128,621 (93.7%) high-risk patients. Guidelines recommended use of IS was significantly lower in high-risk (16.4%) compared to intermediate (64.7%) and low-risk (62.5%) groups. Both men and women in the low-risk category were almost twice as likely to receive early IS compared to high-risk men (28.9% vs 17%, p < 0.001) and women (26.9% vs 15%, p < 0.001). Women (OR 0.91 95%CI 0.88–0.94), troponin elevation (OR 0.39 95%CI 0.36–0.43) and acute heart failure on admission (OR 0.65 95%CI 0.61–0.70) were strong negative predictors of receiving IS within recommended time in the high-risk group. Conclusion: Our study shows that IS for management of NSTEMI is not delivered according to international guidelines recommendations. Specifically, the disconnect between baseline risk and utility of IS increases with increasing risk and women achieve slower access than men to IS.
Guidelines indicated care, Invasive strategy, Non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction, Risk stratification, Timing
7-13
Rashid, Muhammad
f974c0d2-bd55-4d93-940e-1cce3dd0fd59
Curzen, Nick
70f3ea49-51b1-418f-8e56-8210aef1abf4
Kinnaird, Tim
3cfe5aa5-eb28-4a4d-b2e4-6ea0799d85d0
Lawson, Claire A.
631da820-36df-4ffd-ab81-a76953a83eb2
Myint, Phyo K.
c34a336f-bdc1-4d4e-a8cb-7a29b7269765
Kontopantelis, Evangelos
80980bf2-f5d8-4cb4-a348-02250af00915
Mohamed, Mohamed O.
c9566561-5ab5-4d7b-b05d-079ebde7a279
Shoaib, Ahmad
87d9fdcb-a5ce-4379-8280-3115040dc364
Gale, Chris P.
96b5706c-fd86-4b41-9568-3d917ef2c805
Timmis, Adam
afa86b24-5997-4e05-a891-ccaa20c90f20
Mamas, Mamas A.
41515b72-75ff-4922-bb9f-8f9c63f9f5af
15 February 2020
Rashid, Muhammad
f974c0d2-bd55-4d93-940e-1cce3dd0fd59
Curzen, Nick
70f3ea49-51b1-418f-8e56-8210aef1abf4
Kinnaird, Tim
3cfe5aa5-eb28-4a4d-b2e4-6ea0799d85d0
Lawson, Claire A.
631da820-36df-4ffd-ab81-a76953a83eb2
Myint, Phyo K.
c34a336f-bdc1-4d4e-a8cb-7a29b7269765
Kontopantelis, Evangelos
80980bf2-f5d8-4cb4-a348-02250af00915
Mohamed, Mohamed O.
c9566561-5ab5-4d7b-b05d-079ebde7a279
Shoaib, Ahmad
87d9fdcb-a5ce-4379-8280-3115040dc364
Gale, Chris P.
96b5706c-fd86-4b41-9568-3d917ef2c805
Timmis, Adam
afa86b24-5997-4e05-a891-ccaa20c90f20
Mamas, Mamas A.
41515b72-75ff-4922-bb9f-8f9c63f9f5af
Rashid, Muhammad, Curzen, Nick, Kinnaird, Tim, Lawson, Claire A., Myint, Phyo K., Kontopantelis, Evangelos, Mohamed, Mohamed O., Shoaib, Ahmad, Gale, Chris P., Timmis, Adam and Mamas, Mamas A.
(2020)
Baseline risk, timing of invasive strategy and guideline compliance in NSTEMI: Nationwide analysis from MINAP.
International Journal of Cardiology, 301, .
(doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.11.146).
Abstract
Background: International guidelines recommend that for NSTEMI, the timing of invasive strategy (IS) is a function of patient's baseline risk. The extent to which this is delivered across and within healthcare systems is unknown. Methods: Data were derived from 137,265 patients admitted with an NSTEMI diagnosis between 2010 and 2015 in England and Wales. Patients were stratified into low, intermediate and high-risk in keeping with international guidelines. Time to IS was categorised into early (24 h), intermediate (25–72 h) and late (>72 h). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors of guidelines recommended receipt of IS. Results: There were 3608 (2.6%) low, 5037 (3.7%) intermediate and 128,621 (93.7%) high-risk patients. Guidelines recommended use of IS was significantly lower in high-risk (16.4%) compared to intermediate (64.7%) and low-risk (62.5%) groups. Both men and women in the low-risk category were almost twice as likely to receive early IS compared to high-risk men (28.9% vs 17%, p < 0.001) and women (26.9% vs 15%, p < 0.001). Women (OR 0.91 95%CI 0.88–0.94), troponin elevation (OR 0.39 95%CI 0.36–0.43) and acute heart failure on admission (OR 0.65 95%CI 0.61–0.70) were strong negative predictors of receiving IS within recommended time in the high-risk group. Conclusion: Our study shows that IS for management of NSTEMI is not delivered according to international guidelines recommendations. Specifically, the disconnect between baseline risk and utility of IS increases with increasing risk and women achieve slower access than men to IS.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 26 November 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 November 2019
Published date: 15 February 2020
Additional Information:
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Guidelines indicated care, Invasive strategy, Non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction, Risk stratification, Timing
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 438373
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/438373
ISSN: 0167-5273
PURE UUID: 277d65cb-d2e6-4dba-8994-310cbfb843ab
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Mar 2020 17:34
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:02
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Muhammad Rashid
Author:
Tim Kinnaird
Author:
Claire A. Lawson
Author:
Phyo K. Myint
Author:
Evangelos Kontopantelis
Author:
Mohamed O. Mohamed
Author:
Ahmad Shoaib
Author:
Chris P. Gale
Author:
Adam Timmis
Author:
Mamas A. Mamas
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics