The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Baseline risk, timing of invasive strategy and guideline compliance in NSTEMI: Nationwide analysis from MINAP

Baseline risk, timing of invasive strategy and guideline compliance in NSTEMI: Nationwide analysis from MINAP
Baseline risk, timing of invasive strategy and guideline compliance in NSTEMI: Nationwide analysis from MINAP

Background: International guidelines recommend that for NSTEMI, the timing of invasive strategy (IS) is a function of patient's baseline risk. The extent to which this is delivered across and within healthcare systems is unknown. Methods: Data were derived from 137,265 patients admitted with an NSTEMI diagnosis between 2010 and 2015 in England and Wales. Patients were stratified into low, intermediate and high-risk in keeping with international guidelines. Time to IS was categorised into early (24 h), intermediate (25–72 h) and late (>72 h). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors of guidelines recommended receipt of IS. Results: There were 3608 (2.6%) low, 5037 (3.7%) intermediate and 128,621 (93.7%) high-risk patients. Guidelines recommended use of IS was significantly lower in high-risk (16.4%) compared to intermediate (64.7%) and low-risk (62.5%) groups. Both men and women in the low-risk category were almost twice as likely to receive early IS compared to high-risk men (28.9% vs 17%, p < 0.001) and women (26.9% vs 15%, p < 0.001). Women (OR 0.91 95%CI 0.88–0.94), troponin elevation (OR 0.39 95%CI 0.36–0.43) and acute heart failure on admission (OR 0.65 95%CI 0.61–0.70) were strong negative predictors of receiving IS within recommended time in the high-risk group. Conclusion: Our study shows that IS for management of NSTEMI is not delivered according to international guidelines recommendations. Specifically, the disconnect between baseline risk and utility of IS increases with increasing risk and women achieve slower access than men to IS.

Guidelines indicated care, Invasive strategy, Non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction, Risk stratification, Timing
0167-5273
7-13
Rashid, Muhammad
f974c0d2-bd55-4d93-940e-1cce3dd0fd59
Curzen, Nick
70f3ea49-51b1-418f-8e56-8210aef1abf4
Kinnaird, Tim
3cfe5aa5-eb28-4a4d-b2e4-6ea0799d85d0
Lawson, Claire A.
631da820-36df-4ffd-ab81-a76953a83eb2
Myint, Phyo K.
c34a336f-bdc1-4d4e-a8cb-7a29b7269765
Kontopantelis, Evangelos
80980bf2-f5d8-4cb4-a348-02250af00915
Mohamed, Mohamed O.
c9566561-5ab5-4d7b-b05d-079ebde7a279
Shoaib, Ahmad
87d9fdcb-a5ce-4379-8280-3115040dc364
Gale, Chris P.
96b5706c-fd86-4b41-9568-3d917ef2c805
Timmis, Adam
afa86b24-5997-4e05-a891-ccaa20c90f20
Mamas, Mamas A.
41515b72-75ff-4922-bb9f-8f9c63f9f5af
Rashid, Muhammad
f974c0d2-bd55-4d93-940e-1cce3dd0fd59
Curzen, Nick
70f3ea49-51b1-418f-8e56-8210aef1abf4
Kinnaird, Tim
3cfe5aa5-eb28-4a4d-b2e4-6ea0799d85d0
Lawson, Claire A.
631da820-36df-4ffd-ab81-a76953a83eb2
Myint, Phyo K.
c34a336f-bdc1-4d4e-a8cb-7a29b7269765
Kontopantelis, Evangelos
80980bf2-f5d8-4cb4-a348-02250af00915
Mohamed, Mohamed O.
c9566561-5ab5-4d7b-b05d-079ebde7a279
Shoaib, Ahmad
87d9fdcb-a5ce-4379-8280-3115040dc364
Gale, Chris P.
96b5706c-fd86-4b41-9568-3d917ef2c805
Timmis, Adam
afa86b24-5997-4e05-a891-ccaa20c90f20
Mamas, Mamas A.
41515b72-75ff-4922-bb9f-8f9c63f9f5af

Rashid, Muhammad, Curzen, Nick, Kinnaird, Tim, Lawson, Claire A., Myint, Phyo K., Kontopantelis, Evangelos, Mohamed, Mohamed O., Shoaib, Ahmad, Gale, Chris P., Timmis, Adam and Mamas, Mamas A. (2020) Baseline risk, timing of invasive strategy and guideline compliance in NSTEMI: Nationwide analysis from MINAP. International Journal of Cardiology, 301, 7-13. (doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.11.146).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: International guidelines recommend that for NSTEMI, the timing of invasive strategy (IS) is a function of patient's baseline risk. The extent to which this is delivered across and within healthcare systems is unknown. Methods: Data were derived from 137,265 patients admitted with an NSTEMI diagnosis between 2010 and 2015 in England and Wales. Patients were stratified into low, intermediate and high-risk in keeping with international guidelines. Time to IS was categorised into early (24 h), intermediate (25–72 h) and late (>72 h). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors of guidelines recommended receipt of IS. Results: There were 3608 (2.6%) low, 5037 (3.7%) intermediate and 128,621 (93.7%) high-risk patients. Guidelines recommended use of IS was significantly lower in high-risk (16.4%) compared to intermediate (64.7%) and low-risk (62.5%) groups. Both men and women in the low-risk category were almost twice as likely to receive early IS compared to high-risk men (28.9% vs 17%, p < 0.001) and women (26.9% vs 15%, p < 0.001). Women (OR 0.91 95%CI 0.88–0.94), troponin elevation (OR 0.39 95%CI 0.36–0.43) and acute heart failure on admission (OR 0.65 95%CI 0.61–0.70) were strong negative predictors of receiving IS within recommended time in the high-risk group. Conclusion: Our study shows that IS for management of NSTEMI is not delivered according to international guidelines recommendations. Specifically, the disconnect between baseline risk and utility of IS increases with increasing risk and women achieve slower access than men to IS.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 26 November 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 November 2019
Published date: 15 February 2020
Additional Information: Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Guidelines indicated care, Invasive strategy, Non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction, Risk stratification, Timing

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 438373
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/438373
ISSN: 0167-5273
PURE UUID: 277d65cb-d2e6-4dba-8994-310cbfb843ab
ORCID for Nick Curzen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9651-7829

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Mar 2020 17:34
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Muhammad Rashid
Author: Nick Curzen ORCID iD
Author: Tim Kinnaird
Author: Claire A. Lawson
Author: Phyo K. Myint
Author: Evangelos Kontopantelis
Author: Mohamed O. Mohamed
Author: Ahmad Shoaib
Author: Chris P. Gale
Author: Adam Timmis
Author: Mamas A. Mamas

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×