The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Current standards and future perspectives in adjuvant treatment for biliary tract cancers

Current standards and future perspectives in adjuvant treatment for biliary tract cancers
Current standards and future perspectives in adjuvant treatment for biliary tract cancers

Biliary tract cancer, including cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and gallbladder cancer (GBC) are rare tumours with a rising incidence. Prognosis is poor, since most patients are diagnosed with advanced disease. Only ~20% of patients are diagnosed with early-stage disease, suitable for curative surgery. Despite surgery performed with potentially-curative intent, relapse rates are high, with around 60-70% of patients expected to have disease recurrence. Most relapses occur in the form of distant metastases, with a predominance of liver spread. In view of high tumour recurrence, adjuvant strategies have been explored for many years, in the form of radiotherapy, chemo-radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Historically, few randomised trials were available, which included a variety of additional tumours (e.g. pancreatic and ampullary tumours); most evidence relied on phase II and retrospective studies, with no high-quality evidence available to define the real benefit derived from adjuvant strategies. Since 2017, three randomised phase III clinical trials have been reported; all recruited patients with resected biliary tract cancer (CCA and GBC) who were randomised to observation alone, or chemotherapy in the form of gemcitabine (BCAT study; included patients diagnosed with extrahepatic CCA only), gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (PRODIGE-12/ACCORD-18; included patients diagnosed with CCA and GBC) or capecitabine (BILCAP; included patients diagnosed with CCA and GBC). While gemcitabine-based chemotherapy failed to show an impact on patient outcome (relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS)), the BILCAP study showed a benefit from adjuvant capecitabine in terms of OS (pre-planned sensitivity analysis in the intention-to-treat population and in the per-protocol analysis), with confirmed benefit in terms of RFS. Based on the BILCAP trial, international guidelines recommend adjuvant capecitabine for a period of six months following potentially curative resection of CCA as the current standard of care for resected CCA and GBC. However, BILCAP failed to show OS benefit in the intention-to-treat (non-sensitivity analysis) population (primary end-point), and this finding, as well as some inconsistencies between studies has been criticised and has led to confusion in the biliary tract cancer medical community. This review summarises the adjuvant field in biliary tract cancer, with evidence before and after 2017, and comparison between the latest randomised phase III studies. Potential explanations are presented for differential findings, and future steps are explored.

Adjuvant, Biliary tract cancer, Chemotherapy, Cholangiocarcinoma, Gallbladder cancer
0305-7372
101936
Lamarca, Angela
283eb480-1dd5-4341-89ad-c36273322a6f
Edeline, Julien
76d830e6-0012-48b8-b47c-9177618074a4
McNamara, Mairéad G
c3b9d2cc-ebef-47f7-a027-b8014f763f5e
Hubner, Richard A
aeaa2faf-1c3f-4bdc-aba2-ea9f217e19c3
Nagino, Masato
765a69b5-7e9c-4069-97c5-157192c6f624
Bridgewater, John
a7c51f93-a80e-4b89-828f-34f477259d5c
Primrose, John
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
Valle, Juan W
2a6166b1-933c-4e35-8d12-0ccad8318c56
Lamarca, Angela
283eb480-1dd5-4341-89ad-c36273322a6f
Edeline, Julien
76d830e6-0012-48b8-b47c-9177618074a4
McNamara, Mairéad G
c3b9d2cc-ebef-47f7-a027-b8014f763f5e
Hubner, Richard A
aeaa2faf-1c3f-4bdc-aba2-ea9f217e19c3
Nagino, Masato
765a69b5-7e9c-4069-97c5-157192c6f624
Bridgewater, John
a7c51f93-a80e-4b89-828f-34f477259d5c
Primrose, John
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
Valle, Juan W
2a6166b1-933c-4e35-8d12-0ccad8318c56

Lamarca, Angela, Edeline, Julien, McNamara, Mairéad G, Hubner, Richard A, Nagino, Masato, Bridgewater, John, Primrose, John and Valle, Juan W (2020) Current standards and future perspectives in adjuvant treatment for biliary tract cancers. Cancer Treatment Reviews, 84, 101936, [101936]. (doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.101936).

Record type: Review

Abstract

Biliary tract cancer, including cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and gallbladder cancer (GBC) are rare tumours with a rising incidence. Prognosis is poor, since most patients are diagnosed with advanced disease. Only ~20% of patients are diagnosed with early-stage disease, suitable for curative surgery. Despite surgery performed with potentially-curative intent, relapse rates are high, with around 60-70% of patients expected to have disease recurrence. Most relapses occur in the form of distant metastases, with a predominance of liver spread. In view of high tumour recurrence, adjuvant strategies have been explored for many years, in the form of radiotherapy, chemo-radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Historically, few randomised trials were available, which included a variety of additional tumours (e.g. pancreatic and ampullary tumours); most evidence relied on phase II and retrospective studies, with no high-quality evidence available to define the real benefit derived from adjuvant strategies. Since 2017, three randomised phase III clinical trials have been reported; all recruited patients with resected biliary tract cancer (CCA and GBC) who were randomised to observation alone, or chemotherapy in the form of gemcitabine (BCAT study; included patients diagnosed with extrahepatic CCA only), gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (PRODIGE-12/ACCORD-18; included patients diagnosed with CCA and GBC) or capecitabine (BILCAP; included patients diagnosed with CCA and GBC). While gemcitabine-based chemotherapy failed to show an impact on patient outcome (relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS)), the BILCAP study showed a benefit from adjuvant capecitabine in terms of OS (pre-planned sensitivity analysis in the intention-to-treat population and in the per-protocol analysis), with confirmed benefit in terms of RFS. Based on the BILCAP trial, international guidelines recommend adjuvant capecitabine for a period of six months following potentially curative resection of CCA as the current standard of care for resected CCA and GBC. However, BILCAP failed to show OS benefit in the intention-to-treat (non-sensitivity analysis) population (primary end-point), and this finding, as well as some inconsistencies between studies has been criticised and has led to confusion in the biliary tract cancer medical community. This review summarises the adjuvant field in biliary tract cancer, with evidence before and after 2017, and comparison between the latest randomised phase III studies. Potential explanations are presented for differential findings, and future steps are explored.

Text
Adj BTC Cancer Treat Rev FINAL for submission - Accepted Manuscript
Download (808kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 25 November 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 4 December 2019
Published date: March 2020
Additional Information: Funding Information: Dr Angela Lamarca has received funding from The Christie Charity . Publisher Copyright: © 2019 Elsevier Ltd
Keywords: Adjuvant, Biliary tract cancer, Chemotherapy, Cholangiocarcinoma, Gallbladder cancer

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 438401
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/438401
ISSN: 0305-7372
PURE UUID: 36948ab5-b018-4301-8328-8197db2fe8a9
ORCID for John Primrose: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2069-7605

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Mar 2020 17:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:22

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Angela Lamarca
Author: Julien Edeline
Author: Mairéad G McNamara
Author: Richard A Hubner
Author: Masato Nagino
Author: John Bridgewater
Author: John Primrose ORCID iD
Author: Juan W Valle

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×