Sub‐arctic river bank dynamics and driving processes during the open‐channel flow period
Sub‐arctic river bank dynamics and driving processes during the open‐channel flow period
There is growing concern that rapidly changing climate in high latitudes may generate significant geomorphological changes that could mobilise floodplain sediments and carbon; however detailed investigations into the bank erosion process regimes of high latitude rivers remain lacking. Here we employ a combination of thermal and RGB colour time‐lapse photos in concert with water level, flow characteristics, bank sediment moisture and temperature, and topographical data to analyse river bank dynamics during the open‐channel flow period (the period from the rise of the spring snowmelt flood until the autumn low flow period) for a subarctic river in northern Finland (Pulmanki River). We show how variations of bank sediment temperature and moisture affect bank erosion rates and locations, how bank collapses relate to fluvial processes, and elucidate the seasonal variations and interlinkages between the different driving processes.
We find that areas with high levels of groundwater content and loose sand layers were the most prone areas for bank erosion. Groundwater seeping caused continuous erosion throughout the study period, whereas erosion by flowing river water occurred during the peak of snowmelt flood. However, erosion also occurred during the falling phase of the spring flood, mainly due to mass failures. The rising phase of the spring flood therefore did not affect the river bank as much as its peak or receding phases. This is explained because the bank is resistant to erosion due to the prevalence of still frozen and drier sediments at the beginning of the spring flood. Overall, most bank erosion and deposition occurrences were observed during the low flow period after the spring flood. This highlights that spring melt, while often delivering the highest discharges, may not be the main driver of bank erosion in sub‐arctic meandering rivers.
Lotsari, E.
ead97528-e993-41a1-84be-eb86ef4434ab
Hackney, C.
1ff00614-4182-42d2-a5fe-bab9ddf07462
Salmela, J.
0a26f7ce-9ba1-446f-890d-d102dee0f315
Kasvi, E.
06d3a37d-d135-4d56-9a94-79c9013989cf
Kemp, J.
8e6fbb81-2297-4e02-8386-80db5c4d1cbc
Alho, P.
4a10d643-d58d-4229-995a-a9d3dcce8290
Darby, S.E.
4c3e1c76-d404-4ff3-86f8-84e42fbb7970
Lotsari, E.
ead97528-e993-41a1-84be-eb86ef4434ab
Hackney, C.
1ff00614-4182-42d2-a5fe-bab9ddf07462
Salmela, J.
0a26f7ce-9ba1-446f-890d-d102dee0f315
Kasvi, E.
06d3a37d-d135-4d56-9a94-79c9013989cf
Kemp, J.
8e6fbb81-2297-4e02-8386-80db5c4d1cbc
Alho, P.
4a10d643-d58d-4229-995a-a9d3dcce8290
Darby, S.E.
4c3e1c76-d404-4ff3-86f8-84e42fbb7970
Lotsari, E., Hackney, C., Salmela, J., Kasvi, E., Kemp, J., Alho, P. and Darby, S.E.
(2019)
Sub‐arctic river bank dynamics and driving processes during the open‐channel flow period.
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms.
(doi:10.1002/esp.4796).
Abstract
There is growing concern that rapidly changing climate in high latitudes may generate significant geomorphological changes that could mobilise floodplain sediments and carbon; however detailed investigations into the bank erosion process regimes of high latitude rivers remain lacking. Here we employ a combination of thermal and RGB colour time‐lapse photos in concert with water level, flow characteristics, bank sediment moisture and temperature, and topographical data to analyse river bank dynamics during the open‐channel flow period (the period from the rise of the spring snowmelt flood until the autumn low flow period) for a subarctic river in northern Finland (Pulmanki River). We show how variations of bank sediment temperature and moisture affect bank erosion rates and locations, how bank collapses relate to fluvial processes, and elucidate the seasonal variations and interlinkages between the different driving processes.
We find that areas with high levels of groundwater content and loose sand layers were the most prone areas for bank erosion. Groundwater seeping caused continuous erosion throughout the study period, whereas erosion by flowing river water occurred during the peak of snowmelt flood. However, erosion also occurred during the falling phase of the spring flood, mainly due to mass failures. The rising phase of the spring flood therefore did not affect the river bank as much as its peak or receding phases. This is explained because the bank is resistant to erosion due to the prevalence of still frozen and drier sediments at the beginning of the spring flood. Overall, most bank erosion and deposition occurrences were observed during the low flow period after the spring flood. This highlights that spring melt, while often delivering the highest discharges, may not be the main driver of bank erosion in sub‐arctic meandering rivers.
Text
Lotsari_et_al_ESP-19-0225_Accepted MS
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 17 December 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 21 December 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 438473
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/438473
ISSN: 0197-9337
PURE UUID: 61ff4033-7909-49ee-a918-96a3903181bb
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Mar 2020 17:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:23
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
E. Lotsari
Author:
C. Hackney
Author:
J. Salmela
Author:
E. Kasvi
Author:
J. Kemp
Author:
P. Alho
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics