The use of recognition in group decision-making
The use of recognition in group decision-making
Goldstein and Gigerenzer (2002) [Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109 (1), 75-90] found evidence for the use of the recognition heuristic. For example, if an individual recognizes only one of two cities, they tend to infer that the recognized city has a larger population. A prediction that follows is that of the less-is-more effect: Recognizing fewer cities leads, under certain conditions, to more accurate inferences than recognizing more cities. We extend the recognition heuristic to group decision making by developing majority and lexicographic models of how recognition information is used by groups. The chapter formally shows when the less-is-more effect is predicted in groups and the chapter presents a study where threemember groups performed the population comparison task. Several aspects of the data indicate that members who can use the recognition heuristic are, not in all but in most cases, more influential in the group decision process than members who cannot use the heuristic. The chapter also states the less-is-more effect and found that models assuming that members who can use the recognition heuristic are more influential better predict when the effect occurs.
Group deicision making, Less-is-more effect, Lexicographic model, Majority rule, Recognition heuristic
1-22
Reimer, Torsten
c1a99c85-455f-4625-81cf-8462431b326a
Katsikopoulos, Konstantinos V.
b97c23d9-8b24-4225-8da4-be7ac2a14fba
26 May 2011
Reimer, Torsten
c1a99c85-455f-4625-81cf-8462431b326a
Katsikopoulos, Konstantinos V.
b97c23d9-8b24-4225-8da4-be7ac2a14fba
Reimer, Torsten and Katsikopoulos, Konstantinos V.
(2011)
The use of recognition in group decision-making.
In,
Gigerenzer, Gerd, Hertwig, Ralph and Pachur, Thorsten
(eds.)
Heuristics: the Foundations of Adaptive Behavior.
USA.
Oxford University Press, .
(doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744282.003.0027).
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
Goldstein and Gigerenzer (2002) [Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109 (1), 75-90] found evidence for the use of the recognition heuristic. For example, if an individual recognizes only one of two cities, they tend to infer that the recognized city has a larger population. A prediction that follows is that of the less-is-more effect: Recognizing fewer cities leads, under certain conditions, to more accurate inferences than recognizing more cities. We extend the recognition heuristic to group decision making by developing majority and lexicographic models of how recognition information is used by groups. The chapter formally shows when the less-is-more effect is predicted in groups and the chapter presents a study where threemember groups performed the population comparison task. Several aspects of the data indicate that members who can use the recognition heuristic are, not in all but in most cases, more influential in the group decision process than members who cannot use the heuristic. The chapter also states the less-is-more effect and found that models assuming that members who can use the recognition heuristic are more influential better predict when the effect occurs.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 26 May 2011
Keywords:
Group deicision making, Less-is-more effect, Lexicographic model, Majority rule, Recognition heuristic
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 438531
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/438531
PURE UUID: f1f2be46-4f3d-4420-ae8c-dd732e403d98
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Mar 2020 17:35
Last modified: 13 Sep 2024 01:52
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Torsten Reimer
Editor:
Gerd Gigerenzer
Editor:
Ralph Hertwig
Editor:
Thorsten Pachur
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics