The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The drives and affects in Nietzsche’s accounts of knowledge, freedom, and affirmation

The drives and affects in Nietzsche’s accounts of knowledge, freedom, and affirmation
The drives and affects in Nietzsche’s accounts of knowledge, freedom, and affirmation
In this thesis I give accounts of the drives and affects in Nietzsche’s work and use them to give further accounts of three main topics in Nietzsche’s positive philosophy: knowledge, freedom, and affirmation.

In the first two chapters I give accounts of the drives and affects respectively. I argue that the affects play a prominent role in Nietzsche’s work because of their connection to what he thinks it means to value something. I argue that, for Nietzsche, valuing x involves having a positive affective orientation toward x induced by one’s strongest drives.

In chapter 3 I give an account of Nietzsche’s perspectivism. I argue that it consists of two main claims, one descriptive and one prescriptive. The descriptive claim is that knowledge is guided shaped by the affects. The prescriptive claim is that knowledge can be enhanced by using the affects.
I chapter 4 I outline Nietzsche’s three-pronged attack on what he deems an absurd conception of freedom. I then give an account of Nietzsche’s positive conception of freedom. I argue that Nietzschean freedom is a kind of self-determination, it involves being determined by values that are suited to the conditions of one’s flourishing.

In chapter 5 I argue that affirmation is primarily an unreflective process that involves willing power in a way that enhances life. Nietzsche claims that the essence of life is the will to power. Thus, I argue that affirming life just is willing power in a way that brings about the enhancement, expansion, and increased complexity of the will to power itself.

In chapter 6 I look at one particular affect, gaiety, of the kind expressed by what Nietzsche calls “higher laughter” and look at the role it plays in the three main topics of the thesis. I have two goals in the chapter. The first is to illuminate the nature of one particularly important affect in Nietzsche’s positive thought. The second is to use that affect to draw out some important interrelationships between affirmation, freedom, and knowledge.

Finally, in the conclusion, I look at Nietzsche’s style. One important aspect of Nietzsche’s style is that it is affectively engaged and designed to elicit an emotional reaction in its audience. I examine one particular aspect of Nietzsche’s emotive style, namely, his use of humour. I show how Nietzsche uses humour to two main ends. Firstly, it plays a role in Nietzsche’s ad hominem attacks on philosophers, religions, and traditional morality. Secondly, he uses humour to foster the intimacy of a shared sense of community. Humour is one of the ways in which Nietzsche uses his style to find the appropriate readers for his works.
University of Southampton
Boddicker, Charles Campbell
ecc8b4fa-d88b-4072-991d-20fbfe30ad4d
Boddicker, Charles Campbell
ecc8b4fa-d88b-4072-991d-20fbfe30ad4d
Janaway, Christopher
61c48538-365f-416f-b6f7-dfa4d4663475
Woollard, Fiona
c3caccc2-68c9-47c8-b2d3-9735d09f1679

Boddicker, Charles Campbell (2019) The drives and affects in Nietzsche’s accounts of knowledge, freedom, and affirmation. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 162pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

In this thesis I give accounts of the drives and affects in Nietzsche’s work and use them to give further accounts of three main topics in Nietzsche’s positive philosophy: knowledge, freedom, and affirmation.

In the first two chapters I give accounts of the drives and affects respectively. I argue that the affects play a prominent role in Nietzsche’s work because of their connection to what he thinks it means to value something. I argue that, for Nietzsche, valuing x involves having a positive affective orientation toward x induced by one’s strongest drives.

In chapter 3 I give an account of Nietzsche’s perspectivism. I argue that it consists of two main claims, one descriptive and one prescriptive. The descriptive claim is that knowledge is guided shaped by the affects. The prescriptive claim is that knowledge can be enhanced by using the affects.
I chapter 4 I outline Nietzsche’s three-pronged attack on what he deems an absurd conception of freedom. I then give an account of Nietzsche’s positive conception of freedom. I argue that Nietzschean freedom is a kind of self-determination, it involves being determined by values that are suited to the conditions of one’s flourishing.

In chapter 5 I argue that affirmation is primarily an unreflective process that involves willing power in a way that enhances life. Nietzsche claims that the essence of life is the will to power. Thus, I argue that affirming life just is willing power in a way that brings about the enhancement, expansion, and increased complexity of the will to power itself.

In chapter 6 I look at one particular affect, gaiety, of the kind expressed by what Nietzsche calls “higher laughter” and look at the role it plays in the three main topics of the thesis. I have two goals in the chapter. The first is to illuminate the nature of one particularly important affect in Nietzsche’s positive thought. The second is to use that affect to draw out some important interrelationships between affirmation, freedom, and knowledge.

Finally, in the conclusion, I look at Nietzsche’s style. One important aspect of Nietzsche’s style is that it is affectively engaged and designed to elicit an emotional reaction in its audience. I examine one particular aspect of Nietzsche’s emotive style, namely, his use of humour. I show how Nietzsche uses humour to two main ends. Firstly, it plays a role in Nietzsche’s ad hominem attacks on philosophers, religions, and traditional morality. Secondly, he uses humour to foster the intimacy of a shared sense of community. Humour is one of the ways in which Nietzsche uses his style to find the appropriate readers for his works.

Text
CC Boddicker Thesis - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (1MB)

More information

Published date: September 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 438883
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/438883
PURE UUID: 54fb20f6-e982-4413-9be4-564c6b28790f
ORCID for Christopher Janaway: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9600-8837

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Mar 2020 17:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:54

Export record

Contributors

Author: Charles Campbell Boddicker
Thesis advisor: Christopher Janaway ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Fiona Woollard

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×