Moving from collision to integration: reflecting on the experience of mixed methods
Moving from collision to integration: reflecting on the experience of mixed methods
Combining research approaches, commonly referred to as ‘mixed methods’, has the potential to lead to greater insights than would be gained by one approach alone. The discussion in this paper draws on the personal experience of conducting interrelated studies that adopted different methods, underpinned by different methodological positions. In the conduct of the research, several roles were occupied by members of the research team and, together with the mixed methods, gave rise to a number of issues in the conduct and implementation of research. The particular tensions identified are likely to be transferable to other contexts. Key to working with mixed methods is the need for researchers to acknowledge the alternative conceptions of knowledge and reflect on their position in relation to the range of possibilities. It is suggested that continued conflation of particular concepts, i.e. method and paradigm, acts as a barrier to meaningful interdisciplinary working and true integration of insights gained from combined approaches.
mixed methods, research practice, reflection, personal experience
73-83
Simons, L.
894baef5-52f4-4979-9684-1c082b624752
January 2007
Simons, L.
894baef5-52f4-4979-9684-1c082b624752
Simons, L.
(2007)
Moving from collision to integration: reflecting on the experience of mixed methods.
Nursing Times Research, 12 (1), .
(doi:10.1177/1744987106069514).
Abstract
Combining research approaches, commonly referred to as ‘mixed methods’, has the potential to lead to greater insights than would be gained by one approach alone. The discussion in this paper draws on the personal experience of conducting interrelated studies that adopted different methods, underpinned by different methodological positions. In the conduct of the research, several roles were occupied by members of the research team and, together with the mixed methods, gave rise to a number of issues in the conduct and implementation of research. The particular tensions identified are likely to be transferable to other contexts. Key to working with mixed methods is the need for researchers to acknowledge the alternative conceptions of knowledge and reflect on their position in relation to the range of possibilities. It is suggested that continued conflation of particular concepts, i.e. method and paradigm, acts as a barrier to meaningful interdisciplinary working and true integration of insights gained from combined approaches.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: January 2007
Keywords:
mixed methods, research practice, reflection, personal experience
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 43958
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/43958
ISSN: 1361-4096
PURE UUID: b56a7298-1048-4ae5-b101-cbd2212a58ad
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Feb 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 08:59
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
L. Simons
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics