Researching the implementation of pioneering roles in nursing and midwifery
Researching the implementation of pioneering roles in nursing and midwifery
This paper presents research on the implementation of pioneering roles in nursing and midwifery in the United Kingdom—namely lecturer practitioners, consultant nurses and nurse registrars. It seeks to critique the empirical insights gained from studying new roles aimed at better integrating distinct aspects of nursing and midwifery, at solving long-standing ‘problems’ in nursing and midwifery, at extending traditional roles and at improving and advancing practice, education and research.
The paper draws upon knowledge derived from three empirical projects—an ethnographic study and survey of the role of lecturer practitioners, conducted in one setting in the UK (Lathlean, 1997), a study of the role of consultant nurses within healthcare Trusts (Lathlean and Masterson, 2004) and an action-based evaluation of an innovative work based pilot training programme for the development of nurse registrars as aspiring consultant nurses (Surridge and Lathlean, 2006). The paper sets these within the context of an extensive literature on lecturer practitioners and consultant nurses, and encompasses both a national and international perspective through the inclusion of UK, North American and Australian experiences.
The theoretical understandings gleaned from these studies include the apparent inevitability of certain challenges in new roles such as role ambiguity and role overload, the need for organisational commitment to establish and sustain such roles, the variability of roles and the uncertainty as to the achievements of these posts or, at the very least, the extent to which these achievements can be measured. Conclusions drawn include the value of longitudinal studies over short-term cross-sectional research, incorporating approaches that reflect the diversity of the roles; the complexity of ascertaining role impact; and the value of undertaking a qualitative meta-analysis or meta-ethnography of existing studies.
lecturer practitioners, consultant nurses, nurse registrars, ethnography, case study
29-39
Lathlean, Judith
98a74375-c265-47d2-b75b-5f0f3e14c1a9
2007
Lathlean, Judith
98a74375-c265-47d2-b75b-5f0f3e14c1a9
Lathlean, Judith
(2007)
Researching the implementation of pioneering roles in nursing and midwifery.
Nursing Times Research, 12 (1), .
(doi:10.1177/1744987106073582).
Abstract
This paper presents research on the implementation of pioneering roles in nursing and midwifery in the United Kingdom—namely lecturer practitioners, consultant nurses and nurse registrars. It seeks to critique the empirical insights gained from studying new roles aimed at better integrating distinct aspects of nursing and midwifery, at solving long-standing ‘problems’ in nursing and midwifery, at extending traditional roles and at improving and advancing practice, education and research.
The paper draws upon knowledge derived from three empirical projects—an ethnographic study and survey of the role of lecturer practitioners, conducted in one setting in the UK (Lathlean, 1997), a study of the role of consultant nurses within healthcare Trusts (Lathlean and Masterson, 2004) and an action-based evaluation of an innovative work based pilot training programme for the development of nurse registrars as aspiring consultant nurses (Surridge and Lathlean, 2006). The paper sets these within the context of an extensive literature on lecturer practitioners and consultant nurses, and encompasses both a national and international perspective through the inclusion of UK, North American and Australian experiences.
The theoretical understandings gleaned from these studies include the apparent inevitability of certain challenges in new roles such as role ambiguity and role overload, the need for organisational commitment to establish and sustain such roles, the variability of roles and the uncertainty as to the achievements of these posts or, at the very least, the extent to which these achievements can be measured. Conclusions drawn include the value of longitudinal studies over short-term cross-sectional research, incorporating approaches that reflect the diversity of the roles; the complexity of ascertaining role impact; and the value of undertaking a qualitative meta-analysis or meta-ethnography of existing studies.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2007
Keywords:
lecturer practitioners, consultant nurses, nurse registrars, ethnography, case study
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 43959
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/43959
ISSN: 1361-4096
PURE UUID: 2d2801e6-8bd9-4ef3-87bc-3b689e763558
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 02 Feb 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 08:59
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Judith Lathlean
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics