Targeted inhibition of gut bacterial β-glucuronidase activity enhances anticancer drug efficacy
Targeted inhibition of gut bacterial β-glucuronidase activity enhances anticancer drug efficacy
Irinotecan treats a range of solid tumors, but its effectiveness is severely limited by gastrointestinal (GI) tract toxicity caused by gut bacterial β-glucuronidase (GUS) enzymes. Targeted bacterial GUS inhibitors have been shown to partially alleviate irinotecan-induced GI tract damage and resultant diarrhea in mice. Here, we unravel the mechanistic basis for GI protection by gut microbial GUS inhibitors using in vivo models. We use in vitro, in fimo, and in vivo models to determine whether GUS inhibition alters the anticancer efficacy of irinotecan. We demonstrate that a single dose of irinotecan increases GI bacterial GUS activity in 1 d and reduces intestinal epithelial cell proliferation in 5 d, both blocked by a single dose of a GUS inhibitor. In a tumor xenograft model, GUS inhibition prevents intestinal toxicity and maintains the antitumor efficacy of irinotecan. Remarkably, GUS inhibitor also effectively blocks the striking irinotecan-induced bloom of Enterobacteriaceae in immune-deficient mice. In a genetically engineered mouse model of cancer, GUS inhibition alleviates gut damage, improves survival, and does not alter gut microbial composition; however, by allowing dose intensification, it dramatically improves irinotecan's effectiveness, reducing tumors to a fraction of that achieved by irinotecan alone, while simultaneously promoting epithelial regeneration. These results indicate that targeted gut microbial enzyme inhibitors can improve cancer chemotherapeutic outcomes by protecting the gut epithelium from microbial dysbiosis and proliferative crypt damage.
Drug, Metabolomics, Microbiome, Microbiota, Xenobiotic, Gastrointestinal toxicity, Chemotherapy, Cancer
7374-7381
Bhatt, Aadra P
dee53ae0-af2c-4fd0-97ea-e256e0242cd8
Pellock, Samuel J.
2dadc48c-da06-4504-9ac6-83e5c42c3d3d
Biernat, Kristen A.
02f9b0df-9662-4d02-845c-d52a5e8afb70
Walton, William G.
edb8efa4-ccbb-4f16-b7c1-6a8a537d7722
Wallace, Bret D.
2f443316-950e-49d6-afee-9e19ce9c429a
Creekmore, Benjamin C
ae1d98ab-cf9c-4bab-bb2d-9b7409183c48
Letertre, Marine M.
d3fd7a8d-bd8e-4f77-afbd-51b39a695d2a
Swann, Jonathan R.
7c11a66b-f4b8-4dbf-aa17-ad8b0561b85c
Wilson, Ian D.
d7da811b-6cc9-4166-82d0-e780c95122d2
Roques, Jose R.
a7699ab8-69f9-46af-bdb5-dbc9ebc31643
Darr, David B.
0cae851d-8cda-40ee-af8f-65752b3a6eaf
Bailey, Sean T.
77281bdf-abf1-4b5e-958c-a45c289c7eab
Montgomery, Stephanie A.
49486971-14c0-4a04-85c6-b5ff37b12e28
Roach, Jeffrey M.
5d08a663-62d0-4d89-bc9e-9631d8f57c06
Azcarate-Peril, M. Andrea
4681819d-3a7f-48e5-87f5-71271bce520c
Sartor, R. Balfour
224fa913-c288-4861-a9e6-79f4a0ac39f4
Gharaibeh, Raad Z.
5c5b94bc-8b17-4dfe-9a9a-ab77bf68ec1c
Bultman, Scott J.
62c4df2a-9d71-49ec-bb87-317f70e8c4e5
Redinbo, Matthew R.
614489fc-9bb8-4031-b3c5-abb74b7debe6
31 March 2020
Bhatt, Aadra P
dee53ae0-af2c-4fd0-97ea-e256e0242cd8
Pellock, Samuel J.
2dadc48c-da06-4504-9ac6-83e5c42c3d3d
Biernat, Kristen A.
02f9b0df-9662-4d02-845c-d52a5e8afb70
Walton, William G.
edb8efa4-ccbb-4f16-b7c1-6a8a537d7722
Wallace, Bret D.
2f443316-950e-49d6-afee-9e19ce9c429a
Creekmore, Benjamin C
ae1d98ab-cf9c-4bab-bb2d-9b7409183c48
Letertre, Marine M.
d3fd7a8d-bd8e-4f77-afbd-51b39a695d2a
Swann, Jonathan R.
7c11a66b-f4b8-4dbf-aa17-ad8b0561b85c
Wilson, Ian D.
d7da811b-6cc9-4166-82d0-e780c95122d2
Roques, Jose R.
a7699ab8-69f9-46af-bdb5-dbc9ebc31643
Darr, David B.
0cae851d-8cda-40ee-af8f-65752b3a6eaf
Bailey, Sean T.
77281bdf-abf1-4b5e-958c-a45c289c7eab
Montgomery, Stephanie A.
49486971-14c0-4a04-85c6-b5ff37b12e28
Roach, Jeffrey M.
5d08a663-62d0-4d89-bc9e-9631d8f57c06
Azcarate-Peril, M. Andrea
4681819d-3a7f-48e5-87f5-71271bce520c
Sartor, R. Balfour
224fa913-c288-4861-a9e6-79f4a0ac39f4
Gharaibeh, Raad Z.
5c5b94bc-8b17-4dfe-9a9a-ab77bf68ec1c
Bultman, Scott J.
62c4df2a-9d71-49ec-bb87-317f70e8c4e5
Redinbo, Matthew R.
614489fc-9bb8-4031-b3c5-abb74b7debe6
Bhatt, Aadra P, Pellock, Samuel J., Biernat, Kristen A., Walton, William G., Wallace, Bret D., Creekmore, Benjamin C, Letertre, Marine M., Swann, Jonathan R., Wilson, Ian D., Roques, Jose R., Darr, David B., Bailey, Sean T., Montgomery, Stephanie A., Roach, Jeffrey M., Azcarate-Peril, M. Andrea, Sartor, R. Balfour, Gharaibeh, Raad Z., Bultman, Scott J. and Redinbo, Matthew R.
(2020)
Targeted inhibition of gut bacterial β-glucuronidase activity enhances anticancer drug efficacy.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117 (13), .
(doi:10.1073/pnas.1918095117).
Abstract
Irinotecan treats a range of solid tumors, but its effectiveness is severely limited by gastrointestinal (GI) tract toxicity caused by gut bacterial β-glucuronidase (GUS) enzymes. Targeted bacterial GUS inhibitors have been shown to partially alleviate irinotecan-induced GI tract damage and resultant diarrhea in mice. Here, we unravel the mechanistic basis for GI protection by gut microbial GUS inhibitors using in vivo models. We use in vitro, in fimo, and in vivo models to determine whether GUS inhibition alters the anticancer efficacy of irinotecan. We demonstrate that a single dose of irinotecan increases GI bacterial GUS activity in 1 d and reduces intestinal epithelial cell proliferation in 5 d, both blocked by a single dose of a GUS inhibitor. In a tumor xenograft model, GUS inhibition prevents intestinal toxicity and maintains the antitumor efficacy of irinotecan. Remarkably, GUS inhibitor also effectively blocks the striking irinotecan-induced bloom of Enterobacteriaceae in immune-deficient mice. In a genetically engineered mouse model of cancer, GUS inhibition alleviates gut damage, improves survival, and does not alter gut microbial composition; however, by allowing dose intensification, it dramatically improves irinotecan's effectiveness, reducing tumors to a fraction of that achieved by irinotecan alone, while simultaneously promoting epithelial regeneration. These results indicate that targeted gut microbial enzyme inhibitors can improve cancer chemotherapeutic outcomes by protecting the gut epithelium from microbial dysbiosis and proliferative crypt damage.
Text
7374.full
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 17 February 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 March 2020
Published date: 31 March 2020
Keywords:
Drug, Metabolomics, Microbiome, Microbiota, Xenobiotic, Gastrointestinal toxicity, Chemotherapy, Cancer
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 439785
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/439785
ISSN: 0027-8424
PURE UUID: c018302e-0f5d-4104-ba5f-070ab96cbdac
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 May 2020 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:00
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Aadra P Bhatt
Author:
Samuel J. Pellock
Author:
Kristen A. Biernat
Author:
William G. Walton
Author:
Bret D. Wallace
Author:
Benjamin C Creekmore
Author:
Marine M. Letertre
Author:
Ian D. Wilson
Author:
Jose R. Roques
Author:
David B. Darr
Author:
Sean T. Bailey
Author:
Stephanie A. Montgomery
Author:
Jeffrey M. Roach
Author:
M. Andrea Azcarate-Peril
Author:
R. Balfour Sartor
Author:
Raad Z. Gharaibeh
Author:
Scott J. Bultman
Author:
Matthew R. Redinbo
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics