Rising to challenges in assessment and feedback in HCI education: A-peer-supported approach
Rising to challenges in assessment and feedback in HCI education: A-peer-supported approach
Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is a research area which studies how people interact with computer systems. Because of its multidisciplinary nature, HCI modules often sit at unease within the computer science curriculum which is primarily composed by modules typically assessed through objective measures, using quantitative methods. Assessment criteria of HCI topics need to make some subjective measures quantifiable (e.g. aesthetics and creativity). In the case of large classes, it is critical that the assessment can scale appropriately without compromising on the validity of the judgment of how well the learning outcomes have been achieved. In this seminar talk Adriana will focus on her experiences in redesigning the assessment of an undergraduate module on HCI, taking into account increasingly larger classes. Redesign decisions needed to preserve the validity and reliability of the assessment whilst respecting the need for timely feedback. Adriana will explain how learning activities in the module were aligned to the assessment. This included the use of PeerWise for student-authored MCQs, and the use of video to foster creativity and application of knowledge. The combination of these helped leveraging the power of peer interaction for learning.
Wilde, Adriana
4f9174fe-482a-4114-8e81-79b835946224
17 October 2019
Wilde, Adriana
4f9174fe-482a-4114-8e81-79b835946224
Wilde, Adriana
(2019)
Rising to challenges in assessment and feedback in HCI education: A-peer-supported approach.
WAIS Research Seminar, , Julian, United States.
17 Oct 2019.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Other)
Abstract
Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is a research area which studies how people interact with computer systems. Because of its multidisciplinary nature, HCI modules often sit at unease within the computer science curriculum which is primarily composed by modules typically assessed through objective measures, using quantitative methods. Assessment criteria of HCI topics need to make some subjective measures quantifiable (e.g. aesthetics and creativity). In the case of large classes, it is critical that the assessment can scale appropriately without compromising on the validity of the judgment of how well the learning outcomes have been achieved. In this seminar talk Adriana will focus on her experiences in redesigning the assessment of an undergraduate module on HCI, taking into account increasingly larger classes. Redesign decisions needed to preserve the validity and reliability of the assessment whilst respecting the need for timely feedback. Adriana will explain how learning activities in the module were aligned to the assessment. This included the use of PeerWise for student-authored MCQs, and the use of video to foster creativity and application of knowledge. The combination of these helped leveraging the power of peer interaction for learning.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 17 October 2019
Venue - Dates:
WAIS Research Seminar, , Julian, United States, 2019-10-17 - 2019-10-17
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 440608
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/440608
PURE UUID: 7fadca79-3b62-4e21-98ba-007fe612cbd4
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 May 2020 16:32
Last modified: 12 Nov 2024 02:46
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Adriana Wilde
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics