READ ME File For 'Dataset for: The Differential Effect of Anxiety and ADHD Symptoms on Inhibitory Control and Sustained Attention for Threat Stimuli: A Go/No-Go Eye-Movement Study'

Dataset DOI: 10.5258/SOTON/D1042

ReadMe Author: Athina Manoli, University of Southampton [OPTIONAL add ORCID ID]

This dataset supports the publication:
AUTHORS:Athina Manoli, Simon Liversedge, Edmund Sonuga-Barke, Julie Hadwin.
TITLE:The Differential Effect of Anxiety and ADHD Symptoms on Inhibitory Control and Sustained Attention for Threat Stimuli: A Go/No-Go Eye-Movement Study
JOURNAL: Journal of Attention Disorders 
PAPER DOI IF KNOWN:

This dataset contains:

A csv file with the variables used in the main analyses of the paper entitled: "The Differential Effect of Anxiety and ADHD Symptoms on Inhibitory Control and Sustained Attention for Threat Stimuli: A Go/No-Go Eye-Movement Study"
The variables included in the file are:
Partno: Participant ID number
Group: adult or children
Cue_Condition: whether the cue was happy face, angry face or square
Trialno: Trial number
OMISSION_ERROR: 1 if made omission error, 0 if not. In No-Go trials this was set to -1
COMISSION_ERROR: 1 if made commission error, 0 if not. In Go trials this was set to -1.HIT:This stores whether the participant made a saccade to the target in a Go trial (1 if made saccade, 0 if not). In a No Go trial this was set to -1
SacLatency: Saccade latency shown in ms (this is the time from the appearance of the cue/target until the start of a saccade that landed on the target.  It is -1 if there was no saccade to the target and it is be non-zero (and positive) if the participant made a saccade to the target (in either the Go or No Go conditions)
Cue_Type: whether a go or a no-go cue
Age: Participant's age (in years)
STAIC_T: Participant's trait anxiety
ADHD_C: Participant's symptoms of ADHD - Combined 
ADHD_I: Participant's symptoms of ADHD - Inattention
ADHD_H:Participant's symptoms of ADHD - Hyperactive/Impulsive
Gender: male or female


Tha tables are as follows:

Table 1: Mean Saccade Latency (ms) and Omission Errors on Go trials and Commission Errors on No-Go trials in Children and Adults for each Cue Condition.
Table 2: LMMs of Group, Cue Condition, ADHD and Anxiety, and Interactions on Saccade Latency and gLMMs on Saccade Accuracy of Commission Errors.

The figures are as follows:

Fig. 2  Probabilities for commission errors as a function of ADHD symptoms and cue condition (angry faces, happy faces and non-face stimuli) on No-Go trials. Shaded bands represent 95% confidence intervals.
Fig. 3  Saccade latency as a function of ADHD symptoms and cue condition (angry faces, happy faces and non-face stimuli) on Go trials. Shaded bands represent 95% confidence intervals.
Fig. 4  Saccade latency as a function of anxiety and cue condition (angry faces, happy faces and non-face stimuli) on Go trials. Shaded bands represent 95% confidence intervals.
Fig. 5  Saccade latency as a function of ADHD, anxiety and cue condition (angry faces, happy faces and non-face stimuli) on Go trials. For better visualisation anxiety symptoms were divided into low and high groups based on -1 and +1 standard deviation. Shaded bands represent 95% confidence intervals.



Date of data collection: June 2015 - September 2018

Information about geographic location of data collection: Southampton, UK

Licence: CC BY-ND

Related projects: PhD project/data was funded by the Vice-Chancellor Scholarship and the Solent NHS trust.

Date that the file was created: August, 2019