Blurring genres: An agenda for political studies’
Blurring genres: An agenda for political studies’
The first step in mapping a research agenda for political science that draws on the Humanities is to describe where we are now. We describe the dominant intellectual trend affecting all British universities over the past four decades – neoliberalism in the guises of marketisation, and managerialism. Two consequences follow - the mainstreaming of research, and the search for relevance. The case for blurring genres is an opportunity to withdraw from this instrumental rationale and reclaim the intrinsic value of the Humanities and Social Sciences; to reject air of gloom and doom surrounding the Humanities; and to counter the unrelenting pressure for marketization and relevance. Shared trends in political science and the New Area Studies identify the space for working with the Humanities. There is a shared concern with interpretive approaches, and qualitative methods that focuses on the meaning of human action, fieldwork or thick descriptions, narrative analysis, historical contingency, and plausible conjectures. We suggest an ambitious mind map built on four values shared by the Humanities and the ‘soft pure’ Social Sciences; empathy, enlarged thinking, edification, and the examined life.
Humanities, Political Science, area studies, literary criticism
1-29
Rhodes, R. A. W.
cdbfb699-ba1a-4ff0-ba2c-060626f72948
Hodgett, Susan
f1106027-9f44-4ba6-a510-a3cae810ed43
2021
Rhodes, R. A. W.
cdbfb699-ba1a-4ff0-ba2c-060626f72948
Hodgett, Susan
f1106027-9f44-4ba6-a510-a3cae810ed43
Rhodes, R. A. W. and Hodgett, Susan
(2021)
Blurring genres: An agenda for political studies’.
In,
Rhodes, R. A. W. and Hodgett, Susan
(eds.)
What Political Science can learn from the Humanities: Blurring Genres.
Houndmills, Basingstoke.
Palgrave Macmillan, .
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
The first step in mapping a research agenda for political science that draws on the Humanities is to describe where we are now. We describe the dominant intellectual trend affecting all British universities over the past four decades – neoliberalism in the guises of marketisation, and managerialism. Two consequences follow - the mainstreaming of research, and the search for relevance. The case for blurring genres is an opportunity to withdraw from this instrumental rationale and reclaim the intrinsic value of the Humanities and Social Sciences; to reject air of gloom and doom surrounding the Humanities; and to counter the unrelenting pressure for marketization and relevance. Shared trends in political science and the New Area Studies identify the space for working with the Humanities. There is a shared concern with interpretive approaches, and qualitative methods that focuses on the meaning of human action, fieldwork or thick descriptions, narrative analysis, historical contingency, and plausible conjectures. We suggest an ambitious mind map built on four values shared by the Humanities and the ‘soft pure’ Social Sciences; empathy, enlarged thinking, edification, and the examined life.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 2020
Published date: 2021
Keywords:
Humanities, Political Science, area studies, literary criticism
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 440765
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/440765
PURE UUID: 4224083e-f719-4ddc-bd3e-f5df9f3be782
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 May 2020 16:56
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 01:50
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Susan Hodgett
Editor:
R. A. W. Rhodes
Editor:
Susan Hodgett
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics