The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A modified Delphi process to establish future research priorities in malignant oesophagogastric surgery

A modified Delphi process to establish future research priorities in malignant oesophagogastric surgery
A modified Delphi process to establish future research priorities in malignant oesophagogastric surgery
Background
With rapid advancement in the genomics of oesophagogastric (OG) cancer and raised expectations in clinical outcomes from patients and clinicians alike there is a clear need to determine the current research priorities in OG cancer surgery. The aim of our study was to use a modified Delphi process to determine the research priorities among OG cancer surgeons in the United Kingdom.

Methods
Delphi methodology may be utilised to develop consensus opinion amongst a group of experts. Members of the Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland were invited to submit individual research questions via an online survey (phase I). Two rounds of prioritisation by multidisciplinary expert healthcare professionals (phase II and III) were completed to determine a final list of high priority research questions. All questions submitted and subsequently ranked were analysed on an anonymised basis.

Results
In total, 427 questions were submitted in phase I and 75 with an OG cancer focus were taken forward for prioritisation in phase II. Phase III produced a final list of 12 high priority questions with an emphasis on tailored or personalised treatment strategies in OG cancer surgery.

Conclusion
A modified Delphi process produced a list of 12 high priority research questions in OG cancer surgery. Future studies and awards from funding bodies should reflect this consensus list of prioritised questions in the interest of improving patient care and encouraging collaborative research across multiple centres.
1479-666X
Wilson, Michael S.J.
ab4e799f-3c49-41ec-8756-21c667f5e6d4
Blencowe, Natalie S.
58263bc0-93c7-422a-bee5-bde4fe408493
Boyle, Christopher
00ca3bbf-37f2-43bc-afee-d8fa36ed4afd
Knight, Stephen R.
55d26f24-3867-469b-9961-806d0393e7c1
Petty, Russell
b939c114-e5f3-4d46-ad6e-b31c2cfcc704
Vohra, Ravi S.
349f34e8-591b-4c27-8c04-8873caa8f802
Underwood, Timothy
8e81bf60-edd2-4b0e-8324-3068c95ea1c6
AUGIS
Wilson, Michael S.J.
ab4e799f-3c49-41ec-8756-21c667f5e6d4
Blencowe, Natalie S.
58263bc0-93c7-422a-bee5-bde4fe408493
Boyle, Christopher
00ca3bbf-37f2-43bc-afee-d8fa36ed4afd
Knight, Stephen R.
55d26f24-3867-469b-9961-806d0393e7c1
Petty, Russell
b939c114-e5f3-4d46-ad6e-b31c2cfcc704
Vohra, Ravi S.
349f34e8-591b-4c27-8c04-8873caa8f802
Underwood, Timothy
8e81bf60-edd2-4b0e-8324-3068c95ea1c6

Wilson, Michael S.J., Blencowe, Natalie S., Boyle, Christopher, Knight, Stephen R., Petty, Russell, Vohra, Ravi S. and Underwood, Timothy , AUGIS (2019) A modified Delphi process to establish future research priorities in malignant oesophagogastric surgery. The Surgeon. (doi:10.1016/j.surge.2019.11.003).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background
With rapid advancement in the genomics of oesophagogastric (OG) cancer and raised expectations in clinical outcomes from patients and clinicians alike there is a clear need to determine the current research priorities in OG cancer surgery. The aim of our study was to use a modified Delphi process to determine the research priorities among OG cancer surgeons in the United Kingdom.

Methods
Delphi methodology may be utilised to develop consensus opinion amongst a group of experts. Members of the Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland were invited to submit individual research questions via an online survey (phase I). Two rounds of prioritisation by multidisciplinary expert healthcare professionals (phase II and III) were completed to determine a final list of high priority research questions. All questions submitted and subsequently ranked were analysed on an anonymised basis.

Results
In total, 427 questions were submitted in phase I and 75 with an OG cancer focus were taken forward for prioritisation in phase II. Phase III produced a final list of 12 high priority questions with an emphasis on tailored or personalised treatment strategies in OG cancer surgery.

Conclusion
A modified Delphi process produced a list of 12 high priority research questions in OG cancer surgery. Future studies and awards from funding bodies should reflect this consensus list of prioritised questions in the interest of improving patient care and encouraging collaborative research across multiple centres.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 17 November 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 December 2019
Additional Information: AAM Requested from lead author

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 440912
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/440912
ISSN: 1479-666X
PURE UUID: 03fa0347-0a23-4436-996b-fdc6cb23a2b8
ORCID for Timothy Underwood: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9455-2188

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 May 2020 16:37
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:58

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Michael S.J. Wilson
Author: Natalie S. Blencowe
Author: Christopher Boyle
Author: Stephen R. Knight
Author: Russell Petty
Author: Ravi S. Vohra
Corporate Author: AUGIS

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×