The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma as the new field of implementation of laparoscopic liver resection programs. A comparative propensity score-based analysis of open and laparoscopic liver resections

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma as the new field of implementation of laparoscopic liver resection programs. A comparative propensity score-based analysis of open and laparoscopic liver resections
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma as the new field of implementation of laparoscopic liver resection programs. A comparative propensity score-based analysis of open and laparoscopic liver resections

Background: the aim of the present study is to analyze the outcomes of laparoscopic and open liver resections for (Intrahepatic CholangioCarcinoma) ICC in the modern era of laparoscopic liver surgery.

Methods: patients undergoing laparoscopic and open liver resections for ICC in two European referral centers were included. Finally, 104 patients from the open group and 104 patients from the laparoscopic group were compared after propensity scores matching according to seven covariates representative of patients and disease characteristics. Indications to surgery and short- and long-term outcomes were compared.

Results: operative time, number of retrieved nodes, rate, and depth of negative resection margins were comparable between the two groups. Blood loss was lower in the MILS (150 ± 100 mL, mean ± SD) compared with the Open group (350 ± 250 mL, p = 0.030). Postoperative complications occurred in 14.4% of patients in the MILS and in the 24% of patients in the Open group (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in long-term outcomes between groups.

Conclusions: our results confirm feasibility, safety, and oncological efficiency of the laparoscopic approach in the management of ICC. However, this surgery is often complex and should be only considered in centers with large experience in laparoscopic liver surgery.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, Laparoscopy, Liver resection, Minimally invasive, New technique
0930-2794
1851-1862
Ratti, Francesca
6ee4b291-99b0-48c7-b983-6f0f9e14d90d
Rawashdeh, Arab
87661d48-873c-453e-b433-923650a74513
Cipriani, Federica
aca25573-d300-425d-ba9c-20be3190ce2e
Primrose, John
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
Fiorentini, Guido
6b349cc7-d600-44b3-9e31-67e8d547845a
Abu Hilal, Mohammed
2b7464e5-6a59-4bd8-bfe4-27a1918a5c5a
Aldrighetti, Luca
bab36581-c535-4f90-970d-0a982fe7a244
Ratti, Francesca
6ee4b291-99b0-48c7-b983-6f0f9e14d90d
Rawashdeh, Arab
87661d48-873c-453e-b433-923650a74513
Cipriani, Federica
aca25573-d300-425d-ba9c-20be3190ce2e
Primrose, John
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
Fiorentini, Guido
6b349cc7-d600-44b3-9e31-67e8d547845a
Abu Hilal, Mohammed
2b7464e5-6a59-4bd8-bfe4-27a1918a5c5a
Aldrighetti, Luca
bab36581-c535-4f90-970d-0a982fe7a244

Ratti, Francesca, Rawashdeh, Arab, Cipriani, Federica, Primrose, John, Fiorentini, Guido, Abu Hilal, Mohammed and Aldrighetti, Luca (2020) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma as the new field of implementation of laparoscopic liver resection programs. A comparative propensity score-based analysis of open and laparoscopic liver resections. Surgical Endoscopy, 35 (4), 1851-1862. (doi:10.1007/s00464-020-07588-3).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: the aim of the present study is to analyze the outcomes of laparoscopic and open liver resections for (Intrahepatic CholangioCarcinoma) ICC in the modern era of laparoscopic liver surgery.

Methods: patients undergoing laparoscopic and open liver resections for ICC in two European referral centers were included. Finally, 104 patients from the open group and 104 patients from the laparoscopic group were compared after propensity scores matching according to seven covariates representative of patients and disease characteristics. Indications to surgery and short- and long-term outcomes were compared.

Results: operative time, number of retrieved nodes, rate, and depth of negative resection margins were comparable between the two groups. Blood loss was lower in the MILS (150 ± 100 mL, mean ± SD) compared with the Open group (350 ± 250 mL, p = 0.030). Postoperative complications occurred in 14.4% of patients in the MILS and in the 24% of patients in the Open group (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in long-term outcomes between groups.

Conclusions: our results confirm feasibility, safety, and oncological efficiency of the laparoscopic approach in the management of ICC. However, this surgery is often complex and should be only considered in centers with large experience in laparoscopic liver surgery.

Text
Manuscript - Accepted Manuscript
Download (610kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 22 April 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 27 April 2020
Published date: 27 July 2020
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, Laparoscopy, Liver resection, Minimally invasive, New technique

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 441127
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/441127
ISSN: 0930-2794
PURE UUID: 30eca1f7-ac45-400d-87cf-d203807aa158
ORCID for John Primrose: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2069-7605

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Jun 2020 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:35

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Francesca Ratti
Author: Arab Rawashdeh
Author: Federica Cipriani
Author: John Primrose ORCID iD
Author: Guido Fiorentini
Author: Mohammed Abu Hilal
Author: Luca Aldrighetti

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×