Greening of grey infrastructure should not be used as a Trojan horse to facilitate coastal development
Greening of grey infrastructure should not be used as a Trojan horse to facilitate coastal development
Climate change and coastal urbanization are driving the replacement of natural habitats with artificial structures and reclaimed land globally. These novel habitats are often poor surrogates for natural habitats. The application of integrated greening of grey infrastructure (IGGI) to artificial shorelines demonstrates how multifunctional structures can provide biodiversity benefits whilst simultaneously serving their primary engineering function. IGGI is being embraced globally, despite many knowledge gaps and limitations. It is a management tool to compensate anthropogenic impacts as part of the Mitigation Hierarchy. There is considerable scope for misuse and ‘greenwashing’ however, by making new developments appear more acceptable, thus facilitating the regulatory process. We encourage researchers to exercise caution when reporting on small-scale experimental trials. We advocate that greater attention is paid to when experiments ‘fail’ or yield unintended outcomes. We advise revisiting, repeating and expanding on experiments to test responses over broader spatio-temporal scales to improve the evidence base. Synthesis and applications. Where societal and economic demand makes development inevitable, particular attention should be paid to avoiding, minimizing and rehabilitating environmental impacts. Integrated greening of grey infrastructure (IGGI) should be implemented as partial compensation for environmental damage. Mutual benefits for both humans and nature can be achieved when IGGI is implemented retrospectively in previously developed or degraded environments. We caution, however, that any promise of net biodiversity gain from new developments should be scrutinized and any local ecological benefits set in the context of the wider environmental impacts. A ‘greened’ development will always impinge on natural systems, a reality that is much less recognized in the sea than on land.
biodiversity offsetting, dual-use dilemma, environmental damage, integrated greening of grey infrastructure, marine planning, mitigation hierarchy, novel ecosystem, sustainable development
1762-1768
Firth, L.B.
2e186fef-ae70-4fc8-8f3f-34e0073eff9a
Airoldi, L.
cd180085-19d1-4995-8938-52eee2cfbdf1
Bulleri, F.
ef97986a-b4a6-4a7c-a600-1227c0062ae2
Challinor, S.
4a7b1831-3a27-4fb0-b679-397d87bca5a0
Chee, S.‐Y.
e3a6b2e9-fdbe-4e16-bf64-75403199aa70
Evans, A.J.
fba637eb-1639-46ad-b9e5-3747eb01c72e
Hanley, M.E.
3dea5bca-bea0-40fa-a5a8-3e9abbf2dfb2
Knights, A.M.
b461b596-7c93-4e3c-b923-40a3e113432e
O’shaughnessy, K.
a672e2eb-14ca-4091-915e-3d6753f88e6e
Thompson, R.C.
f439ea56-b6dd-48cf-8adb-d9c2ecc6e24d
Hawkins, S.J.
758fe1c1-30cd-4ed1-bb65-2471dc7c11fa
1 September 2020
Firth, L.B.
2e186fef-ae70-4fc8-8f3f-34e0073eff9a
Airoldi, L.
cd180085-19d1-4995-8938-52eee2cfbdf1
Bulleri, F.
ef97986a-b4a6-4a7c-a600-1227c0062ae2
Challinor, S.
4a7b1831-3a27-4fb0-b679-397d87bca5a0
Chee, S.‐Y.
e3a6b2e9-fdbe-4e16-bf64-75403199aa70
Evans, A.J.
fba637eb-1639-46ad-b9e5-3747eb01c72e
Hanley, M.E.
3dea5bca-bea0-40fa-a5a8-3e9abbf2dfb2
Knights, A.M.
b461b596-7c93-4e3c-b923-40a3e113432e
O’shaughnessy, K.
a672e2eb-14ca-4091-915e-3d6753f88e6e
Thompson, R.C.
f439ea56-b6dd-48cf-8adb-d9c2ecc6e24d
Hawkins, S.J.
758fe1c1-30cd-4ed1-bb65-2471dc7c11fa
Firth, L.B., Airoldi, L., Bulleri, F., Challinor, S., Chee, S.‐Y., Evans, A.J., Hanley, M.E., Knights, A.M., O’shaughnessy, K., Thompson, R.C. and Hawkins, S.J.
(2020)
Greening of grey infrastructure should not be used as a Trojan horse to facilitate coastal development.
Journal of Applied Ecology, 57 (9), .
(doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13683).
Abstract
Climate change and coastal urbanization are driving the replacement of natural habitats with artificial structures and reclaimed land globally. These novel habitats are often poor surrogates for natural habitats. The application of integrated greening of grey infrastructure (IGGI) to artificial shorelines demonstrates how multifunctional structures can provide biodiversity benefits whilst simultaneously serving their primary engineering function. IGGI is being embraced globally, despite many knowledge gaps and limitations. It is a management tool to compensate anthropogenic impacts as part of the Mitigation Hierarchy. There is considerable scope for misuse and ‘greenwashing’ however, by making new developments appear more acceptable, thus facilitating the regulatory process. We encourage researchers to exercise caution when reporting on small-scale experimental trials. We advocate that greater attention is paid to when experiments ‘fail’ or yield unintended outcomes. We advise revisiting, repeating and expanding on experiments to test responses over broader spatio-temporal scales to improve the evidence base. Synthesis and applications. Where societal and economic demand makes development inevitable, particular attention should be paid to avoiding, minimizing and rehabilitating environmental impacts. Integrated greening of grey infrastructure (IGGI) should be implemented as partial compensation for environmental damage. Mutual benefits for both humans and nature can be achieved when IGGI is implemented retrospectively in previously developed or degraded environments. We caution, however, that any promise of net biodiversity gain from new developments should be scrutinized and any local ecological benefits set in the context of the wider environmental impacts. A ‘greened’ development will always impinge on natural systems, a reality that is much less recognized in the sea than on land.
Text
1365-2664.13683
- Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Other.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 25 May 2020
Published date: 1 September 2020
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
L.B.F. was supported by the British Ecological Society (5546-6590) and Royal Society (IE150435). L.B.F., L.A., M.E.H., R.C.T. and S.J.H. were supported by EU-FP7.2009-1 Contract 244104. L.B.F., R.C.T. and S.J.H. were supported by Esm?e Fairbairn Foundation. F.B. was supported by University of Pisa PRA 2017. A.J.E. was supported by European Regional Development Fund Ireland-Wales Cooperation Programme 2014?2020. Conversations between co-authors during the joint foresight/ECORES workshop (supported by Euromarine & World Harbour Project) inspired some content of this paper. Thanks to Gee Chapman for commenting on the early drafts of this paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society
Keywords:
biodiversity offsetting, dual-use dilemma, environmental damage, integrated greening of grey infrastructure, marine planning, mitigation hierarchy, novel ecosystem, sustainable development
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 441312
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/441312
ISSN: 0021-8901
PURE UUID: 8193aec1-0e41-4fe1-9edb-28136798057d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Jun 2020 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 08:03
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
L.B. Firth
Author:
L. Airoldi
Author:
F. Bulleri
Author:
S. Challinor
Author:
S.‐Y. Chee
Author:
M.E. Hanley
Author:
A.M. Knights
Author:
K. O’shaughnessy
Author:
R.C. Thompson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics