Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence -based consensus study
Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence -based consensus study
Objective: to improve the quality and consistency of intervention development reporting in health research.
Design: this was a consensus exercise consisting of two simultaneous and identical three-round e-Delphi studies (one with experts in intervention development and one with wider stakeholders including funders, journal editors and public involvement members), followed by a consensus workshop. Delphi items were systematically derived from two preceding systematic reviews and a qualitative interview study.
Participants: intervention developers (n=26) and wider stakeholders (n=18) from the UK, North America and Europe participated in separate e-Delphi studies. Intervention developers (n=13) and wider stakeholders (n=13) participated in a 1-day consensus workshop.
Results: e-Delphi participants achieved consensus on 15 reporting items. Following feedback from the consensus meeting, the final inclusion and wording of 14 items with description and explanations for each item were agreed. Items focus on context, purpose, target population, approaches, evidence, theory, guiding principles, stakeholder contribution, changes in content or format during the development process, required changes for subgroups, continuing uncertainties, and open access publication. They form the GUIDED (GUIDance for the rEporting of intervention Development) checklist, which contains a description and explanation of each item, alongside examples of good reporting.
Conclusions: consensus-based reporting guidance for intervention development in health research is now available for publishers and researchers to use. GUIDED has the potential to lead to greater transparency, and enhance quality and improve learning about intervention development research and practice
Delphi, consensus, intervention development, reporting guidance
e033516
Duncan, Edward
c23c7092-730c-462a-85db-193ac079161d
O'Cathain, Alicia
2fa113fb-2028-4cfb-84e2-2c2fdacce907
Rousseau, Nikki
4ca285a5-911a-4f74-908f-a5f82bf45c18
Croot, Liz
6a7122e5-5491-4c4a-94f7-6be24d84f3a9
Sworn, Katie
2bf35fd4-8c43-4cee-b4a6-68e23dd8e123
Turner, Katrina
c76bab80-e780-4c3e-ab29-88fbfd914bad
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Hoddinott, Pat
d0ad946c-3bc1-4a35-b8fc-4fe7efc3d834
8 April 2020
Duncan, Edward
c23c7092-730c-462a-85db-193ac079161d
O'Cathain, Alicia
2fa113fb-2028-4cfb-84e2-2c2fdacce907
Rousseau, Nikki
4ca285a5-911a-4f74-908f-a5f82bf45c18
Croot, Liz
6a7122e5-5491-4c4a-94f7-6be24d84f3a9
Sworn, Katie
2bf35fd4-8c43-4cee-b4a6-68e23dd8e123
Turner, Katrina
c76bab80-e780-4c3e-ab29-88fbfd914bad
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Hoddinott, Pat
d0ad946c-3bc1-4a35-b8fc-4fe7efc3d834
Duncan, Edward, O'Cathain, Alicia, Rousseau, Nikki, Croot, Liz, Sworn, Katie, Turner, Katrina, Yardley, Lucy and Hoddinott, Pat
(2020)
Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence -based consensus study.
BMJ Open, 10 (4), , [e033516].
(doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033516).
Abstract
Objective: to improve the quality and consistency of intervention development reporting in health research.
Design: this was a consensus exercise consisting of two simultaneous and identical three-round e-Delphi studies (one with experts in intervention development and one with wider stakeholders including funders, journal editors and public involvement members), followed by a consensus workshop. Delphi items were systematically derived from two preceding systematic reviews and a qualitative interview study.
Participants: intervention developers (n=26) and wider stakeholders (n=18) from the UK, North America and Europe participated in separate e-Delphi studies. Intervention developers (n=13) and wider stakeholders (n=13) participated in a 1-day consensus workshop.
Results: e-Delphi participants achieved consensus on 15 reporting items. Following feedback from the consensus meeting, the final inclusion and wording of 14 items with description and explanations for each item were agreed. Items focus on context, purpose, target population, approaches, evidence, theory, guiding principles, stakeholder contribution, changes in content or format during the development process, required changes for subgroups, continuing uncertainties, and open access publication. They form the GUIDED (GUIDance for the rEporting of intervention Development) checklist, which contains a description and explanation of each item, alongside examples of good reporting.
Conclusions: consensus-based reporting guidance for intervention development in health research is now available for publishers and researchers to use. GUIDED has the potential to lead to greater transparency, and enhance quality and improve learning about intervention development research and practice
Text
Reporting_GUIDance_for_intervEntion_Development_in_health_research_revised_0601 (002)
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
Guidance for reporting intervention
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 19 February 2020
Published date: 8 April 2020
Additional Information:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Keywords:
Delphi, consensus, intervention development, reporting guidance
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 441314
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/441314
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: 692450c2-6001-4828-8aa1-ee1869067822
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Jun 2020 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:47
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Edward Duncan
Author:
Alicia O'Cathain
Author:
Nikki Rousseau
Author:
Liz Croot
Author:
Katie Sworn
Author:
Katrina Turner
Author:
Pat Hoddinott
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
