The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Major bleeding rates after prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism: systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost implications

Major bleeding rates after prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism: systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost implications
Major bleeding rates after prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism: systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost implications

OBJECTIVES: The frequency and consequences of major bleeding associated with anticoagulant prophylaxis for prevention of venous thromboembolism is examined.

METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials that reported rates of major bleeding after pharmaceutical thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. Thromboprophylactic agents were divided into four groups: warfarin/other coumarin derivatives (WARF), unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), and pentasaccharide (PS). Meta-analysis was conducted comparing LMWH with each of WARF, UFH, and PS. The frequency of re-operation due to major bleeding was reviewed and combined with published costs to estimate the mean cost of managing major bleeding events in these patients.

RESULTS: Twenty-one studies including 20,523 patients met inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. No evidence of significant between-trial heterogeneity in risk ratios was found. Combined (fixed effects) relative risks (RR) of major bleeding compared with LMWH were WARF--RR 0.59 (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.80); UFH--RR 1.52 (95 percent CI, 1.04-2.23); PS--RR 1.52 (95 percent CI, 1.11-2.09). Seventy-one studies including 32,433 patients were included in the review of consequences of major bleeding. We estimated that the average cost of major bleeding is 113 dollars per patient receiving thromboprophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS: LMWH results in fewer major bleeding episodes than UFH and PS but more than WARF. These events are costly and clinically important.

Anticoagulants/adverse effects, Costs and Cost Analysis, Hemorrhage/chemically induced, Humans, Orthopedic Procedures/adverse effects, Reoperation/economics, Thromboembolism/prevention & control, Venous Thrombosis/prevention & control
0266-4623
405-414
Muntz, James
c5dda816-e04b-4967-be36-ec2821ae3e25
Scott, David A
19b5fd34-9974-4ae4-8be0-27a693639e20
Lloyd, Adam
a7274aaf-5c15-4485-bb9a-52806c919647
Egger, Matthias
84a6571b-8728-4b16-89d3-d5dfd207ad06
Muntz, James
c5dda816-e04b-4967-be36-ec2821ae3e25
Scott, David A
19b5fd34-9974-4ae4-8be0-27a693639e20
Lloyd, Adam
a7274aaf-5c15-4485-bb9a-52806c919647
Egger, Matthias
84a6571b-8728-4b16-89d3-d5dfd207ad06

Muntz, James, Scott, David A, Lloyd, Adam and Egger, Matthias (2004) Major bleeding rates after prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism: systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost implications. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 20 (4), 405-414. (doi:10.1017/s026646230400128x).

Record type: Review

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The frequency and consequences of major bleeding associated with anticoagulant prophylaxis for prevention of venous thromboembolism is examined.

METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials that reported rates of major bleeding after pharmaceutical thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. Thromboprophylactic agents were divided into four groups: warfarin/other coumarin derivatives (WARF), unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), and pentasaccharide (PS). Meta-analysis was conducted comparing LMWH with each of WARF, UFH, and PS. The frequency of re-operation due to major bleeding was reviewed and combined with published costs to estimate the mean cost of managing major bleeding events in these patients.

RESULTS: Twenty-one studies including 20,523 patients met inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. No evidence of significant between-trial heterogeneity in risk ratios was found. Combined (fixed effects) relative risks (RR) of major bleeding compared with LMWH were WARF--RR 0.59 (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.80); UFH--RR 1.52 (95 percent CI, 1.04-2.23); PS--RR 1.52 (95 percent CI, 1.11-2.09). Seventy-one studies including 32,433 patients were included in the review of consequences of major bleeding. We estimated that the average cost of major bleeding is 113 dollars per patient receiving thromboprophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS: LMWH results in fewer major bleeding episodes than UFH and PS but more than WARF. These events are costly and clinically important.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 November 2004
Keywords: Anticoagulants/adverse effects, Costs and Cost Analysis, Hemorrhage/chemically induced, Humans, Orthopedic Procedures/adverse effects, Reoperation/economics, Thromboembolism/prevention & control, Venous Thrombosis/prevention & control

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 441367
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/441367
ISSN: 0266-4623
PURE UUID: cef21b54-8d21-4aba-a743-dfc8ae2d790e
ORCID for David A Scott: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6475-8046

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Jun 2020 16:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: James Muntz
Author: David A Scott ORCID iD
Author: Adam Lloyd
Author: Matthias Egger

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×