Modeling payback from research into the efficacy of left-ventricular assist devices as destination therapy
Modeling payback from research into the efficacy of left-ventricular assist devices as destination therapy
 
  OBJECTIVES: Ongoing developments in design have improved the outlook for left-ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation as a therapy in end-stage heart failure. Nevertheless, early cost-effectiveness assessments, based on first-generation devices, have not been encouraging. Against this background, we set out (i) to examine the survival benefit that LVADs would need to generate before they could be deemed cost-effective; (ii) to provide insight into the likelihood that this benefit will be achieved; and (iii) from the perspective of a healthcare provider, to assess the value of discovering the actual size of this benefit by means of a Bayesian value of information analysis.
METHODS: Cost-effectiveness assessments are made from the perspective of the healthcare provider, using current UK norms for the value of a quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). The treatment model is grounded in published analyses of the Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) trial of first-generation LVADs, translated into a UK cost setting. The prospects for patient survival with second-generation devices is assessed using Bayesian prior distributions, elicited from a group of leading clinicians in the field.
RESULTS: Using established thresholds, cost-effectiveness probabilities under these priors are found to be low (approximately .2 percent) for devices costing as much as 60,000 pounds. Sensitivity of the conclusions to both device cost and QALY valuation is examined.
CONCLUSIONS: In the event that the price of the device in use would reduce to 40,000 pounds, the value of the survival information can readily justify investment in further trials.
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Research, Self-Help Devices, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, United Kingdom, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
  
  
  269-277
  
    
      Girling, Alan J
      
        c1563628-4d38-4e5d-82e6-0c4d33ce761d
      
     
  
    
      Freeman, Guy
      
        7a5405c4-5eff-4edb-ac8e-908c3a87a652
      
     
  
    
      Gordon, Jason P
      
        dbb53e26-2934-40d7-99fc-24c2089b46b9
      
     
  
    
      Poole-Wilson, Philip
      
        71dce720-7139-4c31-a732-30805bc1f049
      
     
  
    
      Scott, David A
      
        19b5fd34-9974-4ae4-8be0-27a693639e20
      
     
  
    
      Lilford, Richard J
      
        43f57c2a-0538-4e13-90aa-df24f5e1df1f
      
     
  
  
   
  
  
    
      1 April 2007
    
    
  
  
    
      Girling, Alan J
      
        c1563628-4d38-4e5d-82e6-0c4d33ce761d
      
     
  
    
      Freeman, Guy
      
        7a5405c4-5eff-4edb-ac8e-908c3a87a652
      
     
  
    
      Gordon, Jason P
      
        dbb53e26-2934-40d7-99fc-24c2089b46b9
      
     
  
    
      Poole-Wilson, Philip
      
        71dce720-7139-4c31-a732-30805bc1f049
      
     
  
    
      Scott, David A
      
        19b5fd34-9974-4ae4-8be0-27a693639e20
      
     
  
    
      Lilford, Richard J
      
        43f57c2a-0538-4e13-90aa-df24f5e1df1f
      
     
  
       
    
 
  
    
      
  
  
  
  
  
  
    Girling, Alan J, Freeman, Guy, Gordon, Jason P, Poole-Wilson, Philip, Scott, David A and Lilford, Richard J
  
  
  
  
   
    (2007)
  
  
    
    Modeling payback from research into the efficacy of left-ventricular assist devices as destination therapy.
  
  
  
  
    International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 23 (2), .
  
   (doi:10.1017/S0266462307070365). 
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
    
      
        
          Abstract
          OBJECTIVES: Ongoing developments in design have improved the outlook for left-ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation as a therapy in end-stage heart failure. Nevertheless, early cost-effectiveness assessments, based on first-generation devices, have not been encouraging. Against this background, we set out (i) to examine the survival benefit that LVADs would need to generate before they could be deemed cost-effective; (ii) to provide insight into the likelihood that this benefit will be achieved; and (iii) from the perspective of a healthcare provider, to assess the value of discovering the actual size of this benefit by means of a Bayesian value of information analysis.
METHODS: Cost-effectiveness assessments are made from the perspective of the healthcare provider, using current UK norms for the value of a quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). The treatment model is grounded in published analyses of the Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) trial of first-generation LVADs, translated into a UK cost setting. The prospects for patient survival with second-generation devices is assessed using Bayesian prior distributions, elicited from a group of leading clinicians in the field.
RESULTS: Using established thresholds, cost-effectiveness probabilities under these priors are found to be low (approximately .2 percent) for devices costing as much as 60,000 pounds. Sensitivity of the conclusions to both device cost and QALY valuation is examined.
CONCLUSIONS: In the event that the price of the device in use would reduce to 40,000 pounds, the value of the survival information can readily justify investment in further trials.
        
        This record has no associated files available for download.
       
    
    
   
  
  
  More information
  
    
      Published date: 1 April 2007
 
    
  
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
     
        Keywords:
        Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Research, Self-Help Devices, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, United Kingdom, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
      
    
  
    
  
    
  
  
  
    
  
  
        Identifiers
        Local EPrints ID: 441382
        URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/441382
        
          
        
        
        
          ISSN: 0266-4623
        
        
          PURE UUID: 1d9aa495-8814-4c50-9677-19740e0c851c
        
  
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
            
              
            
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
  
  Catalogue record
  Date deposited: 11 Jun 2020 16:30
  Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:02
  Export record
  
  
   Altmetrics
   
   
  
 
 
  
    
    
      Contributors
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              Alan J Girling
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              Guy Freeman
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              Jason P Gordon
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              Philip Poole-Wilson
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
              
              
                David A Scott
              
              
                 
              
            
            
          
         
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              Richard J Lilford
            
          
        
      
      
      
    
  
   
  
    Download statistics
    
      Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
      
      View more statistics