The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

How far do you go?: Efficient searching for indirect evidence

How far do you go?: Efficient searching for indirect evidence
How far do you go?: Efficient searching for indirect evidence

BACKGROUND: Indirect evidence is particularly valuable in health care decision making when direct trial evidence comparing relevant treatments is absent or limited. Current approaches using a predetermined set of comparators in the search query may fail to identify all relevant indirect evidence.

PURPOSE: To present a framework for the efficient design of search strategies for identifying clinical trials providing indirect evidence for a treatment comparison.

FINDINGS: The authors present 2 search strategies that differ from traditional search strategies in using a series of iterative searches to identify the set of relevant comparators. In both, the comparators included in each search are determined by the results of previous searches. For a given number of searches, the strategies presented will find all indirect comparisons that include a certain number of comparators linking the treatments of interest. Methods of estimating the value of indirect evidence via a given number of comparators linking the treatments of interest are presented, thus allowing the burden of additional searching to be traded off against the likely impact of finding more distant comparisons. A practical illustration of the search strategies in the context of informing a network meta-analysis of second-line treatments for non-small cell lung cancer is presented.

CONCLUSIONS: The iterative strategies presented offer a means of identifying such evidence and allow the researcher to determine the optimal scope of the search by estimating the value of additional indirect evidence.

Efficiency, Evidence-Based Medicine, Information Storage and Retrieval
0272-989X
273-281
Hawkins, Neil
1aa8112d-606d-4176-b306-9c22158c556d
Scott, David A
19b5fd34-9974-4ae4-8be0-27a693639e20
Woods, Beth
5cc14644-2bc4-4eb0-bc67-a3f18d2db809
Hawkins, Neil
1aa8112d-606d-4176-b306-9c22158c556d
Scott, David A
19b5fd34-9974-4ae4-8be0-27a693639e20
Woods, Beth
5cc14644-2bc4-4eb0-bc67-a3f18d2db809

Hawkins, Neil, Scott, David A and Woods, Beth (2009) How far do you go?: Efficient searching for indirect evidence. Medical Decision Making, 29 (3), 273-281. (doi:10.1177/0272989X08330120).

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Indirect evidence is particularly valuable in health care decision making when direct trial evidence comparing relevant treatments is absent or limited. Current approaches using a predetermined set of comparators in the search query may fail to identify all relevant indirect evidence.

PURPOSE: To present a framework for the efficient design of search strategies for identifying clinical trials providing indirect evidence for a treatment comparison.

FINDINGS: The authors present 2 search strategies that differ from traditional search strategies in using a series of iterative searches to identify the set of relevant comparators. In both, the comparators included in each search are determined by the results of previous searches. For a given number of searches, the strategies presented will find all indirect comparisons that include a certain number of comparators linking the treatments of interest. Methods of estimating the value of indirect evidence via a given number of comparators linking the treatments of interest are presented, thus allowing the burden of additional searching to be traded off against the likely impact of finding more distant comparisons. A practical illustration of the search strategies in the context of informing a network meta-analysis of second-line treatments for non-small cell lung cancer is presented.

CONCLUSIONS: The iterative strategies presented offer a means of identifying such evidence and allow the researcher to determine the optimal scope of the search by estimating the value of additional indirect evidence.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 May 2009
Keywords: Efficiency, Evidence-Based Medicine, Information Storage and Retrieval

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 441392
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/441392
ISSN: 0272-989X
PURE UUID: 9b0ee9fb-e5da-4f34-b820-281dc7bebb8f
ORCID for David A Scott: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6475-8046

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Jun 2020 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Neil Hawkins
Author: David A Scott ORCID iD
Author: Beth Woods

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×