The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Reimbursement and value-based pricing: stratified cost-effectiveness analysis may not be the last word

Reimbursement and value-based pricing: stratified cost-effectiveness analysis may not be the last word
Reimbursement and value-based pricing: stratified cost-effectiveness analysis may not be the last word

During recent discussions, it has been argued that stratified cost-effectiveness analysis has a key role in reimbursement decision-making and value-based pricing (VBP). It has previously been shown that when manufacturers are price-takers, reimbursement decisions made in reference to stratified cost-effectiveness analysis lead to a more efficient allocation of resources than decisions based on whole-population cost-effectiveness analysis. However, we demonstrate that when manufacturers are price setters, reimbursement or VBP based on stratified cost-effectiveness analysis may not be optimal. Using two examples - one considering the choice of thrombolytic treatment for specific patient subgroups and the other considering the extension of coverage for a cancer treatment to include an additional indication - we show that combinations of extended coverage and reduced price can be identified that are advantageous to both payers and manufacturers. The benefits of a given extension in coverage and reduction in price depend both upon the average treatment benefit in the additional population and its size relative to the original population. Negotiation regarding trade-offs between price and coverage may lead to improved outcomes both for health-care systems and manufacturers compared with processes where coverage is determined conditional simply on stratified cost-effectiveness at a given price.

Adult, Aged, Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods, Fees and Charges, Humans, Insurance Coverage/economics, Insurance, Health, Middle Aged, Models, Statistical, Quality of Health Care/economics, Reimbursement Mechanisms/economics, Resource Allocation/economics, United Kingdom
1099-1050
688-698
Hawkins, Neil
1aa8112d-606d-4176-b306-9c22158c556d
Scott, David A
19b5fd34-9974-4ae4-8be0-27a693639e20
Hawkins, Neil
1aa8112d-606d-4176-b306-9c22158c556d
Scott, David A
19b5fd34-9974-4ae4-8be0-27a693639e20

Hawkins, Neil and Scott, David A (2011) Reimbursement and value-based pricing: stratified cost-effectiveness analysis may not be the last word. Health Economics, 20 (6), 688-698. (doi:10.1002/hec.1625).

Record type: Article

Abstract

During recent discussions, it has been argued that stratified cost-effectiveness analysis has a key role in reimbursement decision-making and value-based pricing (VBP). It has previously been shown that when manufacturers are price-takers, reimbursement decisions made in reference to stratified cost-effectiveness analysis lead to a more efficient allocation of resources than decisions based on whole-population cost-effectiveness analysis. However, we demonstrate that when manufacturers are price setters, reimbursement or VBP based on stratified cost-effectiveness analysis may not be optimal. Using two examples - one considering the choice of thrombolytic treatment for specific patient subgroups and the other considering the extension of coverage for a cancer treatment to include an additional indication - we show that combinations of extended coverage and reduced price can be identified that are advantageous to both payers and manufacturers. The benefits of a given extension in coverage and reduction in price depend both upon the average treatment benefit in the additional population and its size relative to the original population. Negotiation regarding trade-offs between price and coverage may lead to improved outcomes both for health-care systems and manufacturers compared with processes where coverage is determined conditional simply on stratified cost-effectiveness at a given price.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 30 March 2011
Keywords: Adult, Aged, Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods, Fees and Charges, Humans, Insurance Coverage/economics, Insurance, Health, Middle Aged, Models, Statistical, Quality of Health Care/economics, Reimbursement Mechanisms/economics, Resource Allocation/economics, United Kingdom

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 441408
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/441408
ISSN: 1099-1050
PURE UUID: 0f7f1b76-af1b-4bfe-8f27-c6baf0442c78
ORCID for David A Scott: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6475-8046

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Jun 2020 16:39
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Neil Hawkins
Author: David A Scott ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×