Comparative efficacy of antibiotics for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI): a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Comparative efficacy of antibiotics for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI): a systematic review and network meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of existing treatments for ABSSSI focusing on the novel lipoglycopeptide oritavancin.
METHODS: EMBASE, MEDLINE, MEDLINE in Process, CENTRAL (Cochrane), and select conferences were searched for randomized controlled trials investigating antimicrobial agents for the treatment of ABSSSI. NMA was used to estimate the odds ratios of the Test-Of-Cure (TOC) and Early Clinical Response (ECR) outcomes for treatments relative to vancomycin in the ITT populations. Sub-group analyses in MRSA and MSSA populations were conducted for TOC; sensitivity analyses investigated the use of the clinically evaluable (CE) populations and the restriction to trials following the recent FDA guidelines for clinical trials.
RESULTS: The systematic review identified 52 trials. The most commonly investigated treatments were vancomycin and linezolid; most trials reported TOC, but not ECR. The posterior mean and 95% credible intervals for odds ratios of TOC for antimicrobial agents relative to vancomycin were: linezolid (1.55; 0.91-2.57), daptomycin (2.18; 0.90-5.42), and oritavancin 1200 mg (1.06; 0.80-1.43). The odds ratio of ECR for oritavancin 1200 mg was 1.02 (0.23-4.33). In the MRSA sub-group the odds ratios relative to vancomycin for TOC were: linezolid (1.55; 0.96-2.46), daptomycin (0.74; 0.13-3.66), and oritavancin 1200 mg (0.94; 0.44-2.02). In the MSSA sub-group they were linezolid (1.36; 0.15-13.34) and oritavancin 1200 mg (0.82; 0.08-7.83). These results were robust to the sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: This NMA provides a unified framework for the comparison of all available antimicrobial agents used in the treatment of ABSSSI and is the first to assess the ECR end-point. The results suggest equivalence of clinical efficacy between vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid, and novel antimicrobial agents including oritavancin for the treatment of ABSSSI at TOC. The wide uncertainty margins indicate the heterogeneity of the available evidence and the need for further research.
Acute Disease, Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use, Glycopeptides/therapeutic use, Humans, Linezolid/therapeutic use, Lipoglycopeptides, Skin Diseases, Bacterial/drug therapy, Vancomycin/therapeutic use
1539-1551
Thom, H
f32eb818-d6c8-41f3-9893-b0232c41fde7
Thompson, J C
ae8a1ed2-4dea-4880-8fdb-bc9d68562f84
Scott, D A
19b5fd34-9974-4ae4-8be0-27a693639e20
Halfpenny, N
4f36586d-89d9-45d5-a1e1-e350629f483c
Sulham, K
bd7311c8-8e0b-413e-9f60-b1f3acdb3f74
Corey, G R
7dde316e-eb31-411c-9780-cb07aa389b7f
August 2015
Thom, H
f32eb818-d6c8-41f3-9893-b0232c41fde7
Thompson, J C
ae8a1ed2-4dea-4880-8fdb-bc9d68562f84
Scott, D A
19b5fd34-9974-4ae4-8be0-27a693639e20
Halfpenny, N
4f36586d-89d9-45d5-a1e1-e350629f483c
Sulham, K
bd7311c8-8e0b-413e-9f60-b1f3acdb3f74
Corey, G R
7dde316e-eb31-411c-9780-cb07aa389b7f
Thom, H, Thompson, J C, Scott, D A, Halfpenny, N, Sulham, K and Corey, G R
(2015)
Comparative efficacy of antibiotics for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI): a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Current Medical Research and Opinion, 31 (8), .
(doi:10.1185/03007995.2015.1058248).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of existing treatments for ABSSSI focusing on the novel lipoglycopeptide oritavancin.
METHODS: EMBASE, MEDLINE, MEDLINE in Process, CENTRAL (Cochrane), and select conferences were searched for randomized controlled trials investigating antimicrobial agents for the treatment of ABSSSI. NMA was used to estimate the odds ratios of the Test-Of-Cure (TOC) and Early Clinical Response (ECR) outcomes for treatments relative to vancomycin in the ITT populations. Sub-group analyses in MRSA and MSSA populations were conducted for TOC; sensitivity analyses investigated the use of the clinically evaluable (CE) populations and the restriction to trials following the recent FDA guidelines for clinical trials.
RESULTS: The systematic review identified 52 trials. The most commonly investigated treatments were vancomycin and linezolid; most trials reported TOC, but not ECR. The posterior mean and 95% credible intervals for odds ratios of TOC for antimicrobial agents relative to vancomycin were: linezolid (1.55; 0.91-2.57), daptomycin (2.18; 0.90-5.42), and oritavancin 1200 mg (1.06; 0.80-1.43). The odds ratio of ECR for oritavancin 1200 mg was 1.02 (0.23-4.33). In the MRSA sub-group the odds ratios relative to vancomycin for TOC were: linezolid (1.55; 0.96-2.46), daptomycin (0.74; 0.13-3.66), and oritavancin 1200 mg (0.94; 0.44-2.02). In the MSSA sub-group they were linezolid (1.36; 0.15-13.34) and oritavancin 1200 mg (0.82; 0.08-7.83). These results were robust to the sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: This NMA provides a unified framework for the comparison of all available antimicrobial agents used in the treatment of ABSSSI and is the first to assess the ECR end-point. The results suggest equivalence of clinical efficacy between vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid, and novel antimicrobial agents including oritavancin for the treatment of ABSSSI at TOC. The wide uncertainty margins indicate the heterogeneity of the available evidence and the need for further research.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 26 May 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 29 June 2015
Published date: August 2015
Keywords:
Acute Disease, Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use, Glycopeptides/therapeutic use, Humans, Linezolid/therapeutic use, Lipoglycopeptides, Skin Diseases, Bacterial/drug therapy, Vancomycin/therapeutic use
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 441414
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/441414
ISSN: 0300-7995
PURE UUID: ee657369-0c67-4493-af2e-8230a6cb7f63
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Jun 2020 16:39
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:02
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
H Thom
Author:
J C Thompson
Author:
D A Scott
Author:
N Halfpenny
Author:
K Sulham
Author:
G R Corey
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics