The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Relative efficacy and safety of simeprevir and telaprevir in treatment-naïve hepatitis C-infected patients in a Japanese population: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Relative efficacy and safety of simeprevir and telaprevir in treatment-naïve hepatitis C-infected patients in a Japanese population: a Bayesian network meta-analysis
Relative efficacy and safety of simeprevir and telaprevir in treatment-naïve hepatitis C-infected patients in a Japanese population: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

AIM: Simeprevir (SMV) is an oral, once-daily protease inhibitor for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection. In phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCT) conducted in Japan, SMV, in combination with peginterferon-α and ribavirin (PEG IFN/RBV), demonstrated potent efficacy in HCV genotype 1-infected patients relative to PEG IFN/RBV and was generally well tolerated. Telaprevir (TVR) in combination with PEG IFN/RBV is licensed for the treatment of HCV in Japan. In the absence of head-to-head comparisons of TVR and SMV in a Japanese population, we undertook a network meta-analysis (NMA) to examine the relative efficacy and safety of SMV and TVR in combination with PEG IFN/RBV.

METHODS: A systematic review identified SMV and TVR RCT in Japanese treatment-naïve patients. Bayesian NMA was performed assuming fixed study effects.

RESULTS: Three studies met our inclusion criteria: two SMV and one TVR. SMV showed a higher mean odds ratio (OR) of achieving SVR versus TVR (OR, 1.68 (95% credible interval 0.66-4.26)). SMV showed a lower mean OR of discontinuation: overall, 0.35 (0.12-1.00); and due to AE, 0.87 (0.23-3.34) versus TVR. SMV showed a lower mean OR of experiencing anemia 0.20 (0.07-0.56) and rash 0.41 (0.17-0.99) but a higher mean OR of experiencing pruritus 1.26 (0.46-3.47) versus TVR.

CONCLUSION: In this indirect treatment comparison, SMV, in combination with PEG IFN/RBV, showed a favorable risk-benefit profile compared with TVR with PEG IFN/RBV in Japanese treatment-naïve HCV patients.

1386-6346
E89-98
Quigley, Joan M.
473a7cea-23e7-4d40-ac5c-e6c3060b5f0f
Bryden, Peter A.
69b8bb6e-5d4e-404d-84f0-5cff1e3e5251
Scott, David A.
19b5fd34-9974-4ae4-8be0-27a693639e20
Kuwabara, Hiroyo
466aa79e-7953-495d-a160-a38f1d5bf550
Cerri, Karin
bcd163cf-1590-4eed-aac5-4db9f8e31fbd
Quigley, Joan M.
473a7cea-23e7-4d40-ac5c-e6c3060b5f0f
Bryden, Peter A.
69b8bb6e-5d4e-404d-84f0-5cff1e3e5251
Scott, David A.
19b5fd34-9974-4ae4-8be0-27a693639e20
Kuwabara, Hiroyo
466aa79e-7953-495d-a160-a38f1d5bf550
Cerri, Karin
bcd163cf-1590-4eed-aac5-4db9f8e31fbd

Quigley, Joan M., Bryden, Peter A., Scott, David A., Kuwabara, Hiroyo and Cerri, Karin (2015) Relative efficacy and safety of simeprevir and telaprevir in treatment-naïve hepatitis C-infected patients in a Japanese population: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Hepatology Research, 45 (10), E89-98. (doi:10.1111/hepr.12467).

Record type: Article

Abstract

AIM: Simeprevir (SMV) is an oral, once-daily protease inhibitor for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection. In phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCT) conducted in Japan, SMV, in combination with peginterferon-α and ribavirin (PEG IFN/RBV), demonstrated potent efficacy in HCV genotype 1-infected patients relative to PEG IFN/RBV and was generally well tolerated. Telaprevir (TVR) in combination with PEG IFN/RBV is licensed for the treatment of HCV in Japan. In the absence of head-to-head comparisons of TVR and SMV in a Japanese population, we undertook a network meta-analysis (NMA) to examine the relative efficacy and safety of SMV and TVR in combination with PEG IFN/RBV.

METHODS: A systematic review identified SMV and TVR RCT in Japanese treatment-naïve patients. Bayesian NMA was performed assuming fixed study effects.

RESULTS: Three studies met our inclusion criteria: two SMV and one TVR. SMV showed a higher mean odds ratio (OR) of achieving SVR versus TVR (OR, 1.68 (95% credible interval 0.66-4.26)). SMV showed a lower mean OR of discontinuation: overall, 0.35 (0.12-1.00); and due to AE, 0.87 (0.23-3.34) versus TVR. SMV showed a lower mean OR of experiencing anemia 0.20 (0.07-0.56) and rash 0.41 (0.17-0.99) but a higher mean OR of experiencing pruritus 1.26 (0.46-3.47) versus TVR.

CONCLUSION: In this indirect treatment comparison, SMV, in combination with PEG IFN/RBV, showed a favorable risk-benefit profile compared with TVR with PEG IFN/RBV in Japanese treatment-naïve HCV patients.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: October 2015

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 441441
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/441441
ISSN: 1386-6346
PURE UUID: e343a248-413f-46d3-8ac0-53b7b4c88447
ORCID for David A. Scott: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6475-8046

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Jun 2020 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Joan M. Quigley
Author: Peter A. Bryden
Author: David A. Scott ORCID iD
Author: Hiroyo Kuwabara
Author: Karin Cerri

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×