Relative efficacy and safety of simeprevir and telaprevir in treatment-naïve hepatitis C-infected patients in a Japanese population: a Bayesian network meta-analysis
Relative efficacy and safety of simeprevir and telaprevir in treatment-naïve hepatitis C-infected patients in a Japanese population: a Bayesian network meta-analysis
AIM: Simeprevir (SMV) is an oral, once-daily protease inhibitor for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection. In phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCT) conducted in Japan, SMV, in combination with peginterferon-α and ribavirin (PEG IFN/RBV), demonstrated potent efficacy in HCV genotype 1-infected patients relative to PEG IFN/RBV and was generally well tolerated. Telaprevir (TVR) in combination with PEG IFN/RBV is licensed for the treatment of HCV in Japan. In the absence of head-to-head comparisons of TVR and SMV in a Japanese population, we undertook a network meta-analysis (NMA) to examine the relative efficacy and safety of SMV and TVR in combination with PEG IFN/RBV.
METHODS: A systematic review identified SMV and TVR RCT in Japanese treatment-naïve patients. Bayesian NMA was performed assuming fixed study effects.
RESULTS: Three studies met our inclusion criteria: two SMV and one TVR. SMV showed a higher mean odds ratio (OR) of achieving SVR versus TVR (OR, 1.68 (95% credible interval 0.66-4.26)). SMV showed a lower mean OR of discontinuation: overall, 0.35 (0.12-1.00); and due to AE, 0.87 (0.23-3.34) versus TVR. SMV showed a lower mean OR of experiencing anemia 0.20 (0.07-0.56) and rash 0.41 (0.17-0.99) but a higher mean OR of experiencing pruritus 1.26 (0.46-3.47) versus TVR.
CONCLUSION: In this indirect treatment comparison, SMV, in combination with PEG IFN/RBV, showed a favorable risk-benefit profile compared with TVR with PEG IFN/RBV in Japanese treatment-naïve HCV patients.
E89-98
Quigley, Joan M.
473a7cea-23e7-4d40-ac5c-e6c3060b5f0f
Bryden, Peter A.
69b8bb6e-5d4e-404d-84f0-5cff1e3e5251
Scott, David A.
19b5fd34-9974-4ae4-8be0-27a693639e20
Kuwabara, Hiroyo
466aa79e-7953-495d-a160-a38f1d5bf550
Cerri, Karin
bcd163cf-1590-4eed-aac5-4db9f8e31fbd
October 2015
Quigley, Joan M.
473a7cea-23e7-4d40-ac5c-e6c3060b5f0f
Bryden, Peter A.
69b8bb6e-5d4e-404d-84f0-5cff1e3e5251
Scott, David A.
19b5fd34-9974-4ae4-8be0-27a693639e20
Kuwabara, Hiroyo
466aa79e-7953-495d-a160-a38f1d5bf550
Cerri, Karin
bcd163cf-1590-4eed-aac5-4db9f8e31fbd
Quigley, Joan M., Bryden, Peter A., Scott, David A., Kuwabara, Hiroyo and Cerri, Karin
(2015)
Relative efficacy and safety of simeprevir and telaprevir in treatment-naïve hepatitis C-infected patients in a Japanese population: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Hepatology Research, 45 (10), .
(doi:10.1111/hepr.12467).
Abstract
AIM: Simeprevir (SMV) is an oral, once-daily protease inhibitor for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection. In phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCT) conducted in Japan, SMV, in combination with peginterferon-α and ribavirin (PEG IFN/RBV), demonstrated potent efficacy in HCV genotype 1-infected patients relative to PEG IFN/RBV and was generally well tolerated. Telaprevir (TVR) in combination with PEG IFN/RBV is licensed for the treatment of HCV in Japan. In the absence of head-to-head comparisons of TVR and SMV in a Japanese population, we undertook a network meta-analysis (NMA) to examine the relative efficacy and safety of SMV and TVR in combination with PEG IFN/RBV.
METHODS: A systematic review identified SMV and TVR RCT in Japanese treatment-naïve patients. Bayesian NMA was performed assuming fixed study effects.
RESULTS: Three studies met our inclusion criteria: two SMV and one TVR. SMV showed a higher mean odds ratio (OR) of achieving SVR versus TVR (OR, 1.68 (95% credible interval 0.66-4.26)). SMV showed a lower mean OR of discontinuation: overall, 0.35 (0.12-1.00); and due to AE, 0.87 (0.23-3.34) versus TVR. SMV showed a lower mean OR of experiencing anemia 0.20 (0.07-0.56) and rash 0.41 (0.17-0.99) but a higher mean OR of experiencing pruritus 1.26 (0.46-3.47) versus TVR.
CONCLUSION: In this indirect treatment comparison, SMV, in combination with PEG IFN/RBV, showed a favorable risk-benefit profile compared with TVR with PEG IFN/RBV in Japanese treatment-naïve HCV patients.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: October 2015
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 441441
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/441441
ISSN: 1386-6346
PURE UUID: e343a248-413f-46d3-8ac0-53b7b4c88447
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Jun 2020 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:02
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Joan M. Quigley
Author:
Peter A. Bryden
Author:
David A. Scott
Author:
Hiroyo Kuwabara
Author:
Karin Cerri
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics